Burning-in as a non-linear experience


I know there has been loads of discussions on the burning-in process of components as well as their parts. If someone does not believe it happens, please do not respond. This is to address mainly the experience people had in burning in components or their parts. The burning-in process is usually described as a linear process, getting from bad to good. But in my experience, and in my system, it is not a linear process. It usually starts from pretty good, to better, then worse, then better, then horrible, and finally wonderful. I was wondering if people had a similar experience. These are pretty drastic changes... And this topic is mainly to focus on this particular thing: non-linear changes during the burning-in process. I had this experience with Furutech NCF outlets, but now I can see the same may apply also to my new capacitors. I have recently replaced my Samsung capacitors with Nichicon LGL2G821MELC40, not an audiophile sort, but the only ones that I could fit in. People are reporting about audiophile capacitors needing a lot of time burning in, I was wondering also if non-audiophile capacities might sometimes need the extended time in a high-resolution system and if their burning-in might also happen not exactly from moving gradually from bad to good. 

serblinfan

(1) without prejudice to the expressed merits in yiur post, “ run-in” rather than “burn-in” is a better and more accurate description of the concept.

(2) “ The burning-in process is usually described as a linear process, getting from bad to good. But in my experience, and in my system, it is not a linear process. It usually starts from pretty good, to better, then worse, then better, then horrible, and finally wonderful. I was wondering if people had a similar experience.l…”

- Yep, I concur that burn-in and audio performance improvements therein are not linear in its classical sense ( ergo an overall uptick trend line) Rather, it is a series of ad hoc step transactions with flat area intermittent pauses in the process… but never a retreat to the worse .

- In any case, the disturbing concept that you described as an initial performance improvement followed by a crazy “bobsled to hell” fall, is bizarre at a minimum in the extreme IMO. , My first thoughts are that there may be something either FUHBAR in the setup, or your room adverse acoustic warts were attended to.


In 50+ years in the crazy hobby with many systems …, and now sitting at the lifelong apex with a $50K 2-channel “A” system ….I have never experienced a roller coaster retreat experience that you describe, Upticks followed by pauses… sure….. but never a steep deep dive event to a “ horrible” anywhere in the journey.

Thank you for your answer. I myself thought it bizarre that something may come from better to horrible, and then to wonderful .But this is my experience and I don't think it's something wrong with my system. I've had this exerience with Furutechs...

The only component that I have burned in that was linear was my cartridge. A really interesting experience as it noticeably improved by the minute.

I know many people who have either seen no change or a gradual change from bad to good. I honestly envy people who buy something new and it's wonderful. I was just wondering if somebody had a different experience, meaning good-bad-better-bad-nice-bad-wonderful, as I have experienced. Of course, when I say "bad" it's not bad objectively, it's more about in relation to the final result. But then, this improvement that you hear at the end of things is so big in terms of nuances that your face smiles at the result.