It fascinates me that people who eschew simple tone controls go for tech that unnecessarily complicates encoding and decoding digital data. Simpler should be better. Things like DSP or EQ (yes, even vinyl RIAA) solve specific issues. With the cost of bandwidth and storage getting cheaper all the time, additional compression (and lossy compression to boot) isn’t needed. Adding in all the proprietary and licensing nonsense or the DRM discussion and it’s just not worth the bother to me. There would have to be a unanimous outcry proclaiming better SQ rather than the muddled mixed bag we have now for me to even try it.
Why is everyone so down on MQA?
Ok. MQA is a little bit complicated to understand without doing a little research. First of all: MQA is not technically a lossy format. The way it works is very unique. The original master tape (Holy grail of SQ) is folded or compressed into a smaller format. It is later unfolded through a process I don’t claim to understand. The fully processed final version is lossless! It is the song version from the original master tape. FYI, original master tapes are usually the best sounding, they are also the truest version of any song- they are painstakingly produced along with the artist in the studio during the recording process. Ask anyone, they are the real deal. For some reason most people hate the sound quality! One caveat, the folding/unfolding process is usually carried out at one time by a dac. But some dacs only compress and do not unfold….I think Meridian should explain dac/ streamer compatibility issue. When your hardware supports the single step the sound quality is pretty amazing. They should have explained in more detail what the format is all about.
- ...
- 82 posts total
One nice feature Tidal recently added was the option to view the scrolling lyrics as the song plays. This is nice for my girlfriend/daughters/friends who want to sing along on the PA system. When listening to a random playlist, it’s easy to hear when a "non-master" song gets thrown in the mix, it’s very flat. Also not a fan of all the hip-hop I have to filter through since Jay-Z bought it. |
I wish I understood MQA better. The way I understand it is it was designed to fold the files 7 times in order to pass the data through slower internet speeds. Now with internet speeds being 1 gig this is no longer necessary. I have a BlueSound Node 2i. The guy from The Cable Company convinced me to hook up my BlueSound to my ARCAM via an expensive digital cable. I told him this would reduce MQA from 7 unfolds to 1 and reduce sound quality. He told me by using a digital cable, I would be able to use the DAC inside my ARCAM which was better than the BlueSound. Maybe QObuz sounds better because you don't have to fold files and because of faster internet speeds this helps QObuz to sound better. The rep from ARCAM cane to my house and conducted a blind test and I picked QObuz every time. I am a afraid to change because I do like the layout of Tidal and don't know how QObuz would look in comparison. It would help if QObuz showed how their graphics look in comparison. I feel kind of stupid about this. This group is far more knowledgeable. |
@bobdg2000 Square has had majority (80%) ownership since March of 2021… |
- 82 posts total