SPU People: I love my Royal N. Which SPU will I like even better?


Recently entered the SPU world. Using a Bokrand/Ortofon AB309 with a Royal N in a Fidelity Research headshell. Which SPU is clearly better and worth the upgrade?

dhcod

Perhaps it helps to give some idea of how these Anniversary models sit inside the SPU sonic spectrum. The A85 is the most ‘classic’ with a very ‘ballsy’ presentation. It has a higher output than most other SPU’s, which could be a welcome feature in some systems. Actually, the SPU Synergy in the current line up is based on the A85. A similar sonic presentation, but without the very handsome lacquered beechwood body. The SPU A90 and A95 feature some of the innovations from the ‘normal’ A90 and A95 counterparts, including laser ‘printed’ bodies in stainless steel and titanium. These are more ‘modern’ sounding systems, yet without sacrificing the SPU character. My personal favourite of these three is the A90. It goes without saying that all SPU’s sound best with an appropriate step up transformer, the choice of which will greatly determine the final results. Enjoy the ride!

@edgewear , I am not sure where this attraction to old HiFi gear comes from. The absolute best combination from my childhood suffers in comparison to the best modern systems. In my view it is all about the best performance. I acknowledge that others view might be different. If they are looking for the best performance they are headed down the wrong path. The reason stylus profiles evolved was to improve performance and record wear. In it's day the Shibata was the best stylus you could buy. It is relatively easy to make. The newer styluses like the Gyger S and the Replicant 100 required advances in manufacturing techniques and machinery.  

@edgewear Thanks for the description of the Anniversary Models. I just popped for an A95. Hope it's not TOO modern.  Not really looking for something even more modern than my Royal N.... I don't think. Who knows really?  One person's modern may very well be another's something else.

@dhcod the A95 is a very musical cartridge and I’m sure you will enjoy it. The sound balance can be further tailored to your taste by the choice of amplification. As said, all SPU’s like SUT’s. The A95 has silver plated copper coils, so the choice of a silver wired SUT might push the sound too far to the brighter side of life. A copper wired SUT would probably be your best option.

@mijostyn I think the idea of aiming for the ‘best’ performance is an illusion. Different strokes to different folks. We simply can’t escape our own, subjective opinion. There are different camps of all sorts, tube versus solid state, analog vs digital, horn vs dipole, etc. In a perfect world these approaches to the ‘absolute sound’ (whatever that means) should happily coexist, but of course that’s not the world we live in. So on forums like this people keep debating this until kingdom come.

The same goes for MC cartridges. If you want to hear everything that went on during the recording process, you inevitably will be attracted to the ‘modern’ camp and choose a cartridge offering the highest possible resolution. This will require the use of advanced stylus profiles as well as other design choices to maximise tracking, minimise distortion, resonances, etc. It will extract the maximum amount of information from the recording if that’s what you’re after. When I’m in the mood for this I would choose something like a Colibri, incidentally a 30+ year ‘old’ design that hasn’t really changed all that much.

However, if you want to get emotionally drawn into the music this is not necessarily the only or even the ‘best’ approach. Some of the musically most rewarding cartridges are not highest resolution at all. Some SPU’s, the FR-7f(z) and Miyabi’s are definitely not the last word in detail retrieval or dissolving spacial cues, but they offer the greatest emotional involvement and musical enjoyment. This ‘certain something’ is very hard to describe or explain, but very easy to hear.