Implications of Esoteric G-0Rb atomic clock

Perhaps a naive question from someone technically challenged, but will any of this have an impact on, or improve upon, the performance of pc-based music delivered not by USB but wirelessly, as with a Sonos or Squeezebox? (Oh please, oh please, tell me it will!!!)

I think THIS is the real future of music delivery, whereby you DON'T have to plug a pc into your system via USB or anything else. Whereby you can sit anywhere in your house and pull up music and play it, via your laptop or your sonos, squeezebox, etc. This is truly the future. Hardwiring is NOT the answer in my book. Convenience equal with reference quality playback is the answer. I wish more effort was being put into this aspect of delivery.

Agear, IMHO you are absolutely correct that USB intefaces are not created equal. (If it was only that simple!). I think we will see just a select few USB based digital standouts in the next year or so. Most likely, many of their competitors will be "scratching their heads" to why they cannot achieve the same sonic greatness when they try to implement a USB connection within their digital products. Steve Nugent is absolutely spot on with his assessments regarding USB variability. Only a very talented digital design staff (that understand digital like Steve Nugent) will be able to implement USB connectivity and actually achieve true sonic greatness due to the myriads of technical issues that Steve pointed out. As you surmised, the most important thing I've learned with this is that the SPDIF connection itself has always "sucked the life" out of what digital was capable of giving us. Of course, the Esoteric $15K Rubiduim clock probably helps fix some of this. ;-)

Bosrt; The wonderful pre-production USB DAC I heard was actually by accident. If their production USB DAC sounds as good as the beta unit I heard I think I will be "beating the drums" very loudly about it. I am so VERY TIRED of seeing the multitudes of huge dollar digital offerings that are being talked up in the rags and on the audio forums that don't actually meet the expectations? (Can we say "almost everything"). I think many audiophiles are getting burned out with digital as they spend STUPID money yet still end up flipping their digital front ends year over year. When are we going to see the super digital "revolutionary" product actually going to meet the hype about it?

BTW: Your "Alien Invasion" statement really cracked me up!

Thanks Ehider for spending the time/energy with these topics.

Eric, you soooo right. We are all sick of this crap. I have been researching and researching and waiting for "that" product to appear but to no avail. One of the sonic themes that comes out in reading reviews pretaining to digital audio is a certain thinness of sound...ultra detailed yes, but lacking warmth, bloom, bass weight, etc. That is what I crave. You mentioned the Memory Player, and while it sounds promising, who is 10K+ lying around? Anyway, I am planning to a little blinded, A+B testing of digital front ends in the not too near future, and I would like to involve non-audiophiles with good ears and music backgrounds (my wife for example) to keep things real. The potential contenders at this point are:

1. Granite Audio 657 (my CDP)
2. Bolder modded SB3 (Ultimate mod)
3. Modded Sonos + Pacecar + DAC (Empirical Audio)
4. Sonos (w/ ? USB mod or converter) + Exemplar USB DAC

Should be interesting.....

Please report back your findings, Agear.