Audio research ref 160M vs ref 250SE


I’m looking to move to one of these two mono blocks (audio research ref 160m or ref 250se) 
I have not been able to hear both in the same room with the same speakers. And to be honest, I haven’t heard the ref 250se in almost 6 months. I will say that I heard the 160m and really enjoyed them.

i think the ref 250se are being closed out in that I see them available for almost half price new in the box with full warranty.

the 160m I would be buying used for just about the same price. The 160m is the way I am leaning. (And leaning pretty hard) But just wanted to see if anyone has a opinion about one. Or the other.

 I am getting a ref 6 Preamplifier.

The rest of my system is:
VPI Classic 3 with a sound Smith VPI zephyr CART
Aqua La Scala mk2 optologic DAC 
‘innous zenith mkiii streamer.
focal sopra 2
rel 3s or s3 subs x2
all Kubala-Sosna interconnects and speaker 
‘currently using a audio research gsi75 intergraded amp 

Any input would be appreciated. It will be one of these two sets that I will be purchasing and although I always appreciate other options, please keep this discussion to the two items listed.

thanks
biketony
Ag insider logo xs@2xbiketony
Biketony, check me on the internal circuit breaker feature on the Ref 160M (S).  If ARC added that feature, that's another maintenance headache that is eliminated and another "buy" point in favor of the 160M (S). 

In the old days, if a power tune blew (i.e., arc'd) in an older ARC amp, it would often take a bias resister with it which acted as a fuse.  I hope I don't  jinx myself here, but so far the KT-150s have never arc'd.  I had the problem with 6550 winged Cs and KT-120s.    

Good luck on whatever you decide.
Bids,
decided to go with the 160m. Had not heard the ref 250se in quite a while and was wondering if the extra power would be missed. But your input about tube replacement and auto bias confirmed what I was already leaning towards. I have to travel close to 400 miles to pickup. Going to pickup around the 17th.

thanks for your input,
‘biketony 

@biketony 

How are the 160Ms working out in your system?  Did you ever clarify if BIF was correct in the circuit protection from tube arcs?

Thanks,
Dana