Convert Flac to Wav - how to & HD space need?



Hi

Have all my CDs ripped to FLAC, and want to convert them to uncompressed WAV files.

I currently have 1100 CDs, using up 308 GBs(In FLAC).

Which software do you recommend to convert to WAV?
+
How much more space will I need on my HD?

Thanks
128x128saffy
Osgorth - first thanks

Are you sure there is nothing that could effect the sound going from a compressed file to CD-r VS uncompressed?

This Guy: www.genesisloudspeakers.com/wh...is recommending uncompressed after two years of research.
Saffy, yeah, if the end result is not identical, then the software used is doing something very wrong indeed (i.e. corrupting the data when decompressing it). The process is the same as playing the files, e.g. before burning the burning application has to decompress the files into memory. So when the actual burning takes place it reads uncompressed PCM from memory and puts it on disc.

I think the confusion comes from the idea that the file is "compressed". It sounds bad, we don't want compression do we.. But, a losslessly compressed file is only compressed while stored on your hard drive. As soon as you want to DO something with it, like playing it or burning it to CD, the file must first be decompressed to its original raw PCM form. And, all lossless compression algorithms have been verified numerous times; they indeed reproduce a bit-for-bit copy of the original PCM data. This is in contrast to the popular "lossy" algorithms like MP3, WMA, AAC and countless others, which apply psychoacoustic models to the music and permanently removes "redundant" information. These files are certainly not identical to the original, and there is no way to reproduce the original bitstream but rather an approximation. When people talk bad about compression, this is often what they're talking about, and that I totally agree with! :) Lossless compression however, is just what it says: it loses nothing.

I had a look at the Genesis web site but couldn't find anything related to compression there. Do you have a direct link to where he talks about this? It would be interesting to see. :)
The thing about lossless compression is that is widely used for software. If you compress a software program and when it is decompressed if even one bit is off the program will probably not operate at all. So lossless has to be truly lossless. I can't understand how it could make any difference whether it is uncompressed or lossless. But then I can't understand how most audiophile tweeks can work.
Osgorth

Compressed VS Un compressed

Here's something he wrote me in an email - I'm sure he won't mind this re-print:

"When I first started doing this, I found that any compression (lossless or not) make some sonic difference. There is a sonic signature to everything from Apple Lossless to FLAC to Monkeys. So, I have generally kept away from them."

Question: So if one goes by that, should I be I concerned To go directly from FLAC compressed to a CD-r, or better First convert the FLAC to back to Lossless?

Try this Link: www.genesisloudspeakers.com/wh...