What do we hear when we change the direction of a wire?


Douglas Self wrote a devastating article about audio anomalies back in 1988. With all the necessary knowledge and measuring tools, he did not detect any supposedly audible changes in the electrical signal. Self and his colleagues were sure that they had proved the absence of anomalies in audio, but over the past 30 years, audio anomalies have not disappeared anywhere, at the same time the authority of science in the field of audio has increasingly become questioned. It's hard to believe, but science still cannot clearly answer the question of what electricity is and what sound is! (see article by A.J.Essien).

For your information: to make sure that no potentially audible changes in the electrical signal occur when we apply any "audio magic" to our gear, no super equipment is needed. The smallest step-change in amplitude that can be detected by ear is about 0.3dB for a pure tone. In more realistic situations it is 0.5 to 1.0dB'". This is about a 10% change. (Harris J.D.). At medium volume, the voltage amplitude at the output of the amplifier is approximately 10 volts, which means that the smallest audible difference in sound will be noticeable when the output voltage changes to 1 volt. Such an error is impossible not to notice even using a conventional voltmeter, but Self and his colleagues performed much more accurate measurements, including ones made directly on the music signal using Baxandall subtraction technique - they found no error even at this highest level.

As a result, we are faced with an apparently unsolvable problem: those of us who do not hear the sound of wires, relying on the authority of scientists, claim that audio anomalies are BS. However, people who confidently perceive this component of sound are forced to make another, the only possible conclusion in this situation: the electrical and acoustic signals contain some additional signal(s) that are still unknown to science, and which we perceive with a certain sixth sense.

If there are no electrical changes in the signal, then there are no acoustic changes, respectively, hearing does not participate in the perception of anomalies. What other options can there be?

Regards.
anton_stepichev
Actually, to put it in simple words, direction of cables (speaker and interconnect) does not matter.

By the way, it also sounds the same one way or another. I tried.

In short, if you are so passionate about defending directionality of cables, go volunteer in local soup kitchen, read to disadvantaged children, or do something else valuable.

"Grandpa, what are you proud of?"

"I showed that guy on the Internet forum how ridiculous he was and that cable direction will give you blacker blacks."

"I am proud of you grandpa. I want to be just like you."
.
I also dont understand why these folks think that the biases they suffer are endemic to the human race
I always suspected some here thought they weren't human.
I remember reading in 1976 in French ,the first edition, the" fractal objects" of Mandelbrot and all the book was about measuring in a way...

The first chapter was: How to measure brittany coast...

 One of the most beautiful book i read...

The book became legendary after that, a milestone in science....

I guess once the world realized that YOU of all people had read, approved, and were moved by Mandelbrot that it was inevitable his book would become “legendary....a milestone in science.”

A golden mind to go along with your golden system and golden ears. 


I have never heard of Mandelbrot, but I like the name. It brings back childhood memories of Christmas.
I guess once the world realized that YOU of all people had read, approved, and were moved by Mandelbrot that it was inevitable his book would become “legendary....a milestone in science.”

A golden mind to go along with your golden system and golden ears.
Speaking of a book reading event in his own life does not means that the writer assume that it was himself that will create the legendary status of the book...

If you interpret my sentence otherwise it is because your intent is to insult me...

You are an idiot if you think so, and i am no more insulted thinking about that in the few instants necessary to write my answer here .... i feel only pity....

I own average ears, average system but very well controlled at low cost in his working dimensions, but compared to yourself probably i own a less average mind than your own....I prefer to not insult freely and without reason someone with whom i never had an interaction before...

Thanks for exposing your "magnificent" soul.....

And to say something positive here, i will add that i discovered the book only because i read an article of Mandelbrot about the modelization of errors on phone line in a book about epistemology few years before his publication of "fractal objects"... This book is a work of art and one of my favorite of all time.... His legendary status was inevitable and save in your insane mind has no relation with my reading....

The name of people who are able to invent a new Geometry are indeed very limited in the history of mankind... Mandelbrot is one of them....

Thanks for your post anyway, i loved the book so much, it is a new occasion to speak about it....

Thinking about it the book of Mandelbrot was for me like a book about number theory written by Lewis Carroll... There is very few PURE mathematical book in this century that reach in 2 or 3 years cult popular status reading level book sellers....Astounding book....Everyone reading this book has his mind changed forever....Think about that....And contrary to many pure mathematical books almost everyone can read it and understanding it....

I wish my post will make some curious about this eternal masterpiece of book....

 It is a book about geometry, the way we see thing and place them in spatial dimensions and localize them... When we read it we discovered that we have never seen in the right perspective ANYTHING that we are contemplated before... Stupendous...

 The book contain a mathematical description of holes in swiss cheese and stars in the sky, relating them with the same dimensional numbers...

 Is it not astounding?