Aes-ebu vs. balanced cable


I need to run a cable (male to female) between my dac and a reclocking device. The dac input is labeled aes-ebu. The plugs on both devices look the same as xlr. One cable distributor said to just use a balanced interconnect, which I already have. Others have said I need need a special aes-ebu 110 cable.  I don’t really understand such details. Can anyone offer advice on who is right and whether to buy an aes ebu cable? Would it do any harm to tryna balanced interconnect?
fast
You're technically supposed to use a 110 Ohm impedance cable. Belden 1800F digital audio cable like what is sold by Blue Jeans Cable has a nominal characteristic impedance of 110 Ohms, for example. It's possible the balanced analog interconnect you already have is 110 Ohms.
Most XLR analog interconnects are built differently than digital AES/EBU cables.  You can use an analog interconnect just fine for AES/EBU, but it is not going to give you as good as performance as a true digital AES/EBU cable.  Analog cables have a completely different design goal.  Digital cables need to be shielded in a certain way and built with a specific impedance in mind.  Solid core conductors in digital cables also help.
@auxinput follow up question! What about the opposite? I have a DAC with balanced analog outputs and have a pair of Mogami Gold AES/EBU XLR cables. Is there any benefit or improved performance when using a 110 Ohm AES/EBU XLR cable in as a balanced analog interconnect that only requires 75 Ohms?

My cable run is 1m. However, what about the same scenario over 25m?

Thanks in advance, this has always been a mystery to me.
@engineears I don't think there is any pro or con associated with using a 110 Ohm impedance cable for analog balanced XLR interconnects.

This Sound on Sound article Understanding Impedance has a good section on the 600 Ohm standard and why we don't care about that for consumer analog audio because we use a voltage signal instead of a power signal.