Rockport Avior 2 vs Wilson Sasha DAW


I’m consider one of these two speakers, the Rockport Avior 2 and the new Wilson Sasha DAW. My room is 19’ x 25’ with a 20’ ceiling, the room floor plan opens behind me into a kitchen and the rest of the house. I listen at low to moderate levels and usually have to supplement the bass with a sub because of the large space. I listen to jazz, folk, classical full orchestra some old classic rock on rare occasions. I’ve always like the detail of electrostatic speakers but they all have there limitations. Looking for a great all around speaker. I Enjoy both tube and solid gear, currently using solid state spectral. I Have several amp choices from Spectral and Rowland. Just wonder if anyone knows these speakers intimately and can give me some strengths of each and an opinion which you would choose and why. I’ve been researching many other speakers and have come down to these two. Thank you for your thoughts.
128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xcarey1110
Also look for Magico, Sonus Faber. Vienna Accoustics, Gamut, etc. Don't limit yourself to just the Wilson and Rockport.
Magico was on my list but a little too analytical i believe. Haven’t heard them but a friend of mine who likes them has described them to me.  I’ve heard the DAW and almost bought it but I was told at the price level the Rockport Avior 2 should be considered as well.  I do like the Wilson DAW a lot,  very smooth top end. No brightness but plenty of detail. 
Just my view from the other side of Planet Earth...

Not impressed with Avior2.
-slow-ish
-dim, despite what people say about Berrylium. It is very different from a FOCAL berrylium which swings toward "aggression".
-shut in
-loose bass
-"uninterested" - in the way music is presented
In fact, I don't understand why it costs so much to make a pair of speakers to sound like that... other than heavy polished woodworks?
Yes, it can handle very high power and feel "inert", but still, it doesn't sing like a high-spirited choir boy with a pristine voice.

Was never impressed with Wilson, until I heard the DAW.
-just very well integrated and balanced. For once, I use the word "musical' on a Wilson product. Usually "Can it play music after a spectacular fireworks?" would have been more of my thinking.  However, the DAW made me want to listen to more music. 

FWIW.

@carey1110

Different models and series within Magico all have different sonic characters. I’ve heard from people that the lower end Magico speakers (under $40k/pair) tend to be somewhat forward accurate & a bit analytical and of course highly depending on the electronics they’re paired with and your listening room. But the top of the line Magico M series such as the M3 & M6 are completely different.

I happen to own a pair of Magico M6 myself and they aren’t analytical at all, far from it. They are very musical very fluid. I pair them with the Naim Statement NAP S1 monoblock amps + Naim Statement NAC S1 linestage analog preamp.

I’ve never heard the Wilson Sasha DAW before but have heard other Wilson Audio speakers such as the Sasha ll, Sabrina, Alexis ll & Alexx. The Alexx were by far my favorite Wilson speakers although the Wilson Wamm are most likely the best Wilson speakers but I have yet to hear the Wamm. But the Alexx are smaller version of the Wamm and they share pretty much same DNA and similar design concept. I used to own a pair of Wilson Alexx before the Magico M6 and the Magico M6 are quite a bit better imo but cost a lot more than the big Wilson Alexx.

IMO the Wilson Sabrina & Sasha ll were very neutral and forward sounding speakers and excel in details & resolution. When I heard the Sasha ll they were driven by a pair of ARC tube monoblock amps & ARC tube preamp and they were still somewhat forward.
However I have yet to hear the Sasha DAW but will be psyched to hear them one day at my local dealer that happens to be a Wilson Audio dealer.
Thanks, Carey - from my auditions this year:

1. Neither the Wilson or Rockport has any brightness or harshness. I don't know how Andy Payor does it in the latter. 

2. Rockport has superior tone with tighter, articulate bass. Best ported bass I've auditioned.

3. Dynamics much better with Wilson. I'd say imaging and soundstage are comparable. 

Good luck with your decision!