Absolute top tier DAC for standard res Redbook CD


Hi All.

Putting together a reference level system.
My Source is predominantly standard 16/44 played from a MacMini using iTunes and Amarra. Some of my music is purchased from iTunes and the rest is ripped from standard CD's.
For my tastes in music, my high def catalogues are still limited; so Redbook 16/44 will be my primary source for quite some time.

I'm not spending DCS or MSB money. But $15-20k retail is not out of the question.

Upsampling vs non-upsampling?
USB input vs SPDIF?

All opinions welcome.

And I know I need to hear them, but getting these ultra $$$ DAC's into your house for an audition ain't easy.

Looking for musical, emotional, engaging, accurate , with great dimension. Not looking for analytical and sterile.
mattnshilp
Not sure why some are so adamant to keep on trying to say R2R is always better etc...

@ctsooner 

I suspect the answer to your question has something to do with feedback (no pun intended) from those - such as myself - who have heard both technologies and merely wish to convey their findings.
I think you don’t know what your talking about. Delta sigma beat discrete how could that be if information is missing?

@jwm 

In answer to your question, please refer to the post I directed to audioengr 01-13-2018 7:34pm. Thanks.
If the Bricasti was not used with Ethernet through it’s own internal board then no contest. Through usb it’s good but not great. I had the latest total dac and the Bricasti had way more dynamics. There was nothing about the total dac that was better. If you like hi fi sound then I could see how you could like the total dac. 
Hi Hal,

I would put it that delta-sigma is a **less direct** way of accomplishing D/A conversion than R2R. However, the results of BOTH approaches are approximations, in the sense that what comes out does not correspond to what goes in to an infinitely precise degree. And of course the same goes for everything else in the recording and reproduction chain, both theoretically and in terms of the various practical implementations, from the recording microphones to the speakers in our listening rooms and everything in between. Even the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, which underlies A/D conversion, D/A conversion, and essentially all digital signal processing, is an approximation in any real world implementation. (For example, note in that Wikipedia page the various equations involving integrals or summations that are taken from minus infinity to plus infinity).

So in that sense **everything** in the recording and reproduction chain is lossy, to some degree. Which of course tells us nothing whatsoever about which design approaches and which practical implementations of those approaches are to be preferred. But my perception and belief, as evidenced in part by various posts from highly experienced audiophiles in this very thread, has been that depending on the specific implementation both approaches can provide results which are satisfactory to many, at pretty much all price points that can be considered to be audiophile-oriented.

It’s as simple as that, IMO.

Best regards,
-- Al

@almarg

Thank you so much Al for putting all of this into lets call it "much better perspective". Given what you are stating - that in a sense everything in the recording and reproduction chain is lossy - can/would you provide your opinion, even if mere speculation, as to what Schiit is meaning by their statement:

"we can’t get over the fact that delta-sigma DACs throw away all the original samples"

This appears to indicate samples - which I assume and perhaps is implied is equivalent to music - is in fact lost, at least to a greater degree than could or otherwise should be lost.