What is the best speaker for a small room 10X11


I'm lucky enough to have a dedicated listening room (WAF is not a factor), but I'm wondering if my Dunlavey SC3''s are the right choice... room is 10X11 with 9' ceilings..

I listen to a bit of everything, but most interested in jazz & blues.

Thanks,
brent

Sources:
VPI Aries/JMW 10/Shelter 501
Meridian 506/Monarchy DIP/Upsampler/DAC

Preamp:
Audio Research LS-7
(Supratek Syrah has been ordered)

Amp:
McCormack DNA 0.5 (Upgraded by Steve to Rev. A)
bgrazman
I'm using SC-III's in a similar sized L-shaped room. They sound very good, but I know I'm not hearing their full potential. I think the recommended placement is at least ten feet between speakers and an equal distance to the listing position, toed-in sharply. Placement on the long-wall is also supposed to be best, but obviously not an option for you.

I had very good results treating the first reflection points at the sides and ceiling with 3x3 acoustic foam tiles. More room treatment is likely to help.

I also put 2x2 brass cones between the plinth and my carpeted floor and got a nice improvement in clarity and focus.

I'm now in the midst of a crossover upgrade. I replaced all the sandcast resistors with Mills wirewounds and next I'm putting in Auricaps in place of the stock Solens.

Ideally, yes, you're going to have, and already do have, tremendous bass response challenges in that room! (if it's a closed-in 10x11x9!). IF those are the true boundary dimmensions, you'll be hard pressed to not have a boomy sonic signature bellow 50hz, with peaks and dips a plenty! Why is this a challenge? The sound will ALWAYS sound like a SMALL ROOM BOOMY, PEAKY, ONE-NOTEY kind of sound unfortunately. If you use more bass limited monitors you're better off, and maybe add a CAREFULLY PLACED subwoofer to augment, included in VERY WELL CONSIDERED seating possition!
YOu'll have like one choice in that room that will sound LISTENENABLE (Maybe) for your speakers, and also a listening possition...nothing more. The Dunlavy's have a tiny advantage in smoothing your your bass problems, in that they have bass drivers in multiple planes(or two), as compared to speakers with one bass driver in one plane, etc.
HOWEVER, you could definitely(have to tinker) get rid of your problems here DRAMATICALLY if you BIAMP your SCIII's and put a parametric EQ on the bottom posts/woofers!!!! This will allow you to FLATTEN the bass response greatly, and thus get rid of the small room sound tremendously! Of course you'll need to adress other acoustic issues, and keep the room on the LIVE SIDE!...as small rooms are easily made more DEAD sounding with too much absorbtion.
There are other speakers you can get away with putting an EQ on the bass woofer, like a lot of 3 way designs. (B&W 804's, NHT 2.9's, Hales Transcendence(?), etc), all which might be very effective if set up well and EQ'd in your small room! This really is a must for you if you go the full range speaker route in your room.(again, if it's what you say it is).
You could however find some more managable, less fuss kind of sound in smaller monitors on stands. And you should be ok with 24-26" stands with your 9'ceiling. Granted, you'll still have MORE bass anomolies to contend with ideally, than if you PROPERLY EQ'D a pair of FULL RANGE MONITORS like your Dunlavy's!!!!! You can get em sounding very very smooth and flat, giving you a very large room bass response if you do it right with a parametric EQ!!!! Also, the speakers will sound even more dynamic if you biamp them! You'll have to check for tonal balance on some speakers when you biamp however. As some speakers aren't really designed to biamp well. I think you'll be ok if you get something like a good used strong bass amp with volume controls, like the excellent Parasound amps for bass! YOu can put that on the bottom posts, and your DNA .5 on the top! Should sound VERY GOOD! You might try...
AnywaY, those are my suggestions.
Oh, do you like the Dunlavy's well enough? Why are you considering others? Aren't getting good sound in your small room? I understand if that's the case. I used to have a smallish 10.5 X 12.5 X 8 foot room that was a real challenge to get sounding good! You'll get better results with monitors in your room with a 9' ceiling on stands than I did overall, but you're not out of the woods unless you treat your bass response problems!!
Again, you might consider biamping and EQing! I think this is the only way, without affecting your midrange and high's, to get great sound in your tiny room! YOu could play around with careful small speaker placemnt in that room *(like some used Merlin TSM-m's, or Revel M20's, or whatever), on stands, and carefully place or even eq in a sub in that room! You could even get a quick little 8" sub that's fast and musical to integrate. It will sound great if you're good at settting it up!
Hope this helps...and I'm pretty right-on about what I'm saying here for the record.(ha!)
good luck
Speaker placement and room dampening should suffice...I would experiment with this before investing in any new gear...to move beyond Dunlavy is no easy task...and more difficult since they went out of business...first off...if you have a hard surface...get a large rug...and a few rugs or sound absorbing materials on at least one side wall...start by by placing the speakers 4ft from the back wall...this should give enough depth...and most designers with first order networks recommend a listening distance of at least 6 ft...which would put your listening position at the other end of the room...and place the speakers 4-5 ft apart which should leave about 2ft or more from the sides...I wouldnt bother toeing them in...fire them straight forward...this will minimize side-wall reflections...dont waste money on an EQ...and I think u will be pleasantly surprised...your speakers also have another advantage...they are a sealed design...so the rear out of phase wave is dissipated quickly...ported designs might be problematic in this tight space...
I agree with forever above (and would like to apologize for my HD600 remark, as I know you have to live with this room....).
I especially like the idea of using a moderate-sized, QUICK-woofered 2-way monitor, VERY carefully set up in a near-field arrangement. This will allow you to erase the sidewalls (by sitting close to the speakers, and having them away from the sidewalls). Then move this "triangle" around to smooth out bass freq resp as best you can.
The Revel M20 would be an outstanding choice at $1500 or so; the Spendor S3/1p at $900...and a myriad of other sub-1K
2-ways with UNbloated bass.
Yes your room is almost overwhelmingly challenging. Be sure to "erase" it with wall-to-wall, stuffed furniture, sidewall damping, etc., to null out those early reflections, and again, move your triangle around to minimize aggregate bass nodes. You're basically accomplishing a pro near-field monitoring geometry...sprt-of a giant headphone (hence the Sennheiser quip isn't SO totally off!).
Good Luck...and stay away from big woofers...especially ported ones. remember that your ear/brain WILL fill in the bottom octave if the upper bass is quick and accurate.
Maybe even cheap Paradigm Atoms are an inexpensive experiment?
I had an opportunity to audition the new PMC DB-1 mini-monitors in a small dedicated listening room (12x10) and thought that they were very good. The bass was much more focused and they imaged wonderfully. At times could be on the bright side, but overall they are the best I have heard under 1k. If you are looking to spend more I would highly recommend the more refined ProAc 1SC.....