what is dynamic headroom?


what is dynamic headroom and do i need to worry about it? i am purchasing a used B&K st-3140 amp and after looking at the specs, it has the lowest dynamic headroom of any B&K amp at 1.0dB. how does this affect sound? same thing with dampening factor? the B&K's is 100. what does this mean?
128x128fishcall
wow! thanks for all the great responses. i love this site! the B&K's dampening factor is 100 at 50Hz. that's all the info that the specs give, but it looks like i do not need to worry with the specs and see how she sounds.....
thanks,
fISHCALL
Gs: "As far as damping factor is concerned, a ratio of speaker impedance to total output impedance greater than 10 will adequately control most cone drivers."

Does this mean that an amp with an output impedance of .1 ohm will be able to control a speaker with an impedance of 1 ohm ? That is a 10:1 ratio. : )

Other than that, the higher the output impedance of the amp and / or the lower the impedance of the speaker, the more the damping factor is reduced. The lower the ratio of damping factor, the higher the potential for the speaker to load down the output of the amp. This can result in higher distortion levels, frequency response abberations, poorer transient response, etc... Given typical SS amplifier designs, an 8 ohm load would be more desirable than a 4 ohm load in terms of "control" even though power transfer is reduced. As you go lower in impedance on the speaker, the amp is not only working harder to pass more current and dissipate more heat, it could become less linear depending on the design. When you start combining low impedance with low sensitivity AND high levels of reactance in a speaker, you really hurt yourself in terms of limiting the amount of amplifiers that you have available to choose from. Unfortunately, some very good speakers combine all of those attributes, making the need for "tank-like" amps a necessity for use with those speakers. Sean
>
Clueless: The first two articles are interesting to me because they seem to imply that differences in damping factor shouldn't matter much in audible terms, which could be seen as somewhat contradicting the notion of critical damping as explained in the third article. Of course my own listening experience with various amps possessing different damping factors can't confirm or deny any conclusion decisively, since many other factors are always in play (such as the impact of negative feedback on amplifier sound) without being held constant. But thinking about this stuff always puts me in mind of resistive loading of MC cartridges, which I see as an analogous situation, and in that case I *have* heard audible differences corresponding to system resistance changes with everything else held constant, and those results would seem to support the notion of there being underdamped, critically damped, and overdamped conditions possible.