@celander
I have shown that psec levels of jitter is indeed need, but it’s already >300psec for 16-bit.
Also, no, jitter doesn’t alter the reaslism of instruments/vocals, the type of jitter we are talking about is a rise in the noise floor, or distortion-like peaks of low-level. Meaning, it’s like a bit of static added in. And again, this whole conversation was about the how a new Toslink cable make a drastic reduction in jitter. Keep in mind how I showed even the budget-ish DragonFly DAC can reduce even immense jitter well below the noise floor anyway.
Also, here are some measurements of different Toslink cables: http://archimago.blogspot.com/2013/05/measurements-toslink-optical-audio.html?m=1
Including a freebie one, an intentionally poorly made one, an all glass one,etc.
Guess what? They are 99.9% identical, and jitter all below 100dBFS. So yeah, I stand further by my claim that the poster simply fell prone to placebo.
I have shown that psec levels of jitter is indeed need, but it’s already >300psec for 16-bit.
Also, no, jitter doesn’t alter the reaslism of instruments/vocals, the type of jitter we are talking about is a rise in the noise floor, or distortion-like peaks of low-level. Meaning, it’s like a bit of static added in. And again, this whole conversation was about the how a new Toslink cable make a drastic reduction in jitter. Keep in mind how I showed even the budget-ish DragonFly DAC can reduce even immense jitter well below the noise floor anyway.
Also, here are some measurements of different Toslink cables: http://archimago.blogspot.com/2013/05/measurements-toslink-optical-audio.html?m=1
Including a freebie one, an intentionally poorly made one, an all glass one,etc.
Guess what? They are 99.9% identical, and jitter all below 100dBFS. So yeah, I stand further by my claim that the poster simply fell prone to placebo.