Why choose studio speakers over full range?


I need to learn about the pros and cons of studio speakers. I thought they were only for space challenged situations. Should they be considered when this is not the case? It is difficult to comprehend getting punchy base and mid base from the compromised surface area of small drivers. I have a large (25'x30') listening area and would like to feel percussion from moderate level listening (Rock, Motown, jazz/blues) This is a quality that I'm after in my quest to find speakers for a BAT project (see previous thread). Will a monitor choice force the use of a sub, if not, why? Thanks all!
repeter
Far from being a wimp, this HM415 speaker is capable of 138 db SPL with next to no distortion.

I don't think my house insurance would cover some of its special effects. :)

Regards,
-- Al
There are several advantages to minimonitors:

1) The drivers are so small and close together that they come pretty close to forming a point source.
2) The front baffle is very small, eliminating most diffraction distortion--the time smear you get from reflected sound waves bouncing off the front baffle.
3) With such small box panels, it is easier to build a minimonitor free of enclosure resonances.
4) A 2-way speaker with a small mid/woofer has less time lag in the separate arrival times of the woofer and tweeter elements. Minimonitors are inherently *almost* time-aligned. Their ability to "disappear" while throwing a large, well-delineated soundstage is captivating. Their speed and clarity make small-group acoustic music come alive--think small jazz ensembles and acoustic folk/pop (James Taylor, Sarah McClachlan, Joni Mitchell, etc.)

The disadvantages are, of course, small radiating area, making it a struggle to scale up to large complex pieces and fill large spaces, bass extension, and dynamics at both ends of the spectrum.

That's why there are premium minimonitors that use mid/woofers capable of greater cone excursions to be able to play louder and go deeper while retaining the decided advantages of a near point source mounted in a nearly inert cabinet with minimal front baffle area. Examples include the better Totem stand-mounted speakers (The One and Mani-2) and the Sonus Faber Guarneri Memento.

Still, I wouldn't likely choose minimonitors for a such a large listening area, unless it included powered subs that were time-aligned with the monitors--maybe a pair of Totem The Ones or Mani-2's plus a pair of JLs or RELs.
Most studios use multiple speakers for points of reference, a near field and far field arrangement. There are many reasons; some may be mixing preference, some studio are not as acoustically neutral as they should be, mixers want to know what their music will sound like on smaller and large systems.

Hi-end colored fullrange speakers are usually not used because that is part of what happened to many recordings in the 60's to 1980's. Some monitors were bass reflex and were used near walls, and the bass resulted in many 'engineers' EQing the bass down in their recordings and the warmth of the speaker made them boost the high mids. Typically a good studio wants the most honest reproduction affordable within reason.