Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC?


Dear friends: who really needs an MM type phono cartridge?, well I will try to share/explain with you what are my experiences about and I hope too that many of you could enrich the topic/subject with your own experiences.

For some years ( in this forum ) and time to time I posted that the MM type cartridge quality sound is better than we know or that we think and like four months ago I start a thread about: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1173550723&openusid&zzRauliruegas&4&5#Rauliruegas where we analyse some MM type cartridges.

Well, in the last 10-12 months I buy something like 30+ different MM type phono cartridges ( you can read in my virtual system which ones. ) and I’m still doing it. The purpose of this fact ( “ buy it “ ) is for one way to confirm or not if really those MM type cartridges are good for us ( music lovers ) and at the same time learn about MM vs MC cartridges, as a fact I learn many things other than MM/MC cartridge subject.

If we take a look to the Agon analog members at least 90% of them use ( only ) MC phono cartridges, if we take a look to the “ professional reviewers “ ( TAS, Stereophile, Positive Feedback, Enjoy the Music, etc, etc, ) 95% ( at least ) of them use only MC cartridges ( well I know that for example: REG and NG of TAS and RJR of Stereophile use only MM type cartridges!!!!!!!! ) , if we take a look to the phono cartridge manufacturers more than 90% of them build/design for MC cartridges and if you speak with audio dealers almost all will tell you that the MC cartridges is the way to go.

So, who are wrong/right, the few ( like me ) that speak that the MM type is a very good alternative or the “ whole “ cartridge industry that think and support the MC cartridge only valid alternative?

IMHO I think that both groups are not totally wrong/right and that the subject is not who is wrong/right but that the subject is : KNOW-HOW or NON KNOW-HOW about.

Many years ago when I was introduced to the “ high end “ the cartridges were almost MM type ones: Shure, Stanton, Pickering, Empire, etc, etc. In those time I remember that one dealer told me that if I really want to be nearest to the music I have to buy the Empire 4000 D ( they say for 4-channel reproduction as well. ) and this was truly my first encounter with a “ high end cartridge “, I buy the 4000D I for 70.00 dls ( I can’t pay 150.00 for the D III. ), btw the specs of these Empire cartridges were impressive even today, look: frequency response: 5-50,000Hz, channel separation: 35db, tracking force range: 0.25grs to 1.25grs!!!!!!!!, just impressive, but there are some cartridges which frequency response goes to 100,000Hz!!!!!!!!!!

I start to learn about and I follow to buying other MM type cartridges ( in those times I never imagine nothing about MC cartridges: I don’t imagine of its existence!!!. ) like AKG, Micro Acoustics, ADC, B&O, Audio Technica, Sonus, etc, etc.

Years latter the same dealer told me about the MC marvelous cartridges and he introduce me to the Denon-103 following with the 103-D and the Fulton High performance, so I start to buy and hear MC cartridges. I start to read audio magazines about either cartridge type: MM and Mc ones.

I have to make changes in my audio system ( because of the low output of the MC cartridges and because I was learning how to improve the performance of my audio system ) and I follow what the reviewers/audio dealers “ speak “ about, I was un-experienced !!!!!!!, I was learning ( well I’m yet. ).

I can tell you many good/bad histories about but I don’t want that the thread was/is boring for you, so please let me tell you what I learn and where I’m standing today about:

over the years I invested thousands of dollars on several top “ high end “ MC cartridges, from the Sumiko Celebration passing for Lyras, Koetsu, Van denHul, to Allaerts ones ( just name it and I can tell that I own or owned. ), what I already invest on MC cartridges represent almost 70-80% price of my audio system.

Suddenly I stop buying MC cartridges and decide to start again with some of the MM type cartridges that I already own and what I heard motivate me to start the search for more of those “ hidden jewels “ that are ( here and now ) the MM phono cartridges and learn why are so good and how to obtain its best quality sound reproduction ( as a fact I learn many things other than MM cartridge about. ).

I don’t start this “ finding “ like a contest between MC and MM type cartridges.
The MC cartridges are as good as we already know and this is not the subject here, the subject is about MM type quality performance and how achieve the best with those cartridges.

First than all I try to identify and understand the most important characteristics ( and what they “ means “. ) of the MM type cartridges ( something that in part I already have it because our phonolinepreamp design needs. ) and its differences with the MC ones.

Well, first than all is that are high output cartridges, very high compliance ones ( 50cu is not rare. ), low or very low tracking force ones, likes 47kOhms and up, susceptible to some capacitance changes, user stylus replacement, sometimes we can use a different replacement stylus making an improvement with out the necessity to buy the next top model in the cartridge line , low and very low weight cartridges, almost all of them are build of plastic material with aluminum cantilever and with eliptical or “ old “ line contact stylus ( shibata ) ( here we don’t find: Jade/Coral/Titanium/etc, bodies or sophisticated build material cantilevers and sophisticated stylus shape. ), very very… what I say? Extremely low prices from 40.00 to 300.00 dls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, well one of my cartridges I buy it for 8.99 dls ( one month ago ): WOW!!!!!!, so any one of you can/could have/buy ten to twenty MM cartridges for the price of one of the MC cartridge you own today and the good notice is that is a chance that those 10-20 MM type cartridges even the quality performance of your MC cartridge or beat it.

Other characteristics is that the builders show how proud they were/are on its MM type cartridges design, almost all those cartridges comes with a first rate box, comes with charts/diagrams of its frequency response and cartridge channel separation ( where they tell us which test recording use it, with which VTF, at which temperature, etc, etc. ), comes with a very wide explanation of the why’s and how’s of its design and the usual explanation to mount the cartridge along with a very wide list of specifications ( that were the envy of any of today MC ones where sometimes we really don’t know nothing about. ), comes with a set of screws/nuts, comes with a stylus brush and even with stylus cleaning fluid!!!!!!!!!, my GOD. Well, there are cartridges like the Supex SM 100MK2 that comes with two different stylus!!!! One with spherical and one with elliptical/shibata shape and dear friends all those in the same low low price!!!!!!!!!!!

Almost all the cartridges I own you can find it through Ebay and Agon and through cartridge dealers and don’t worry if you loose/broke the stylus cartridge or you find the cartridge but with out stylus, you always can/could find the stylus replacement, no problem about there are some stylus and cartridge sources.

When I’m talking about MM type cartridges I’m refer to different types: moving magnet, moving iron, moving flux, electret, variable reluctance, induced magnet, etc, etc. ( here is not the place to explain the differences on all those MM type cartridges. Maybe on other future thread. ).

I made all my very long ( time consuming ) cartridge tests using four different TT’s: Acoustic Signature Analog One MK2, Micro Seiki RX-5000, Luxman PD 310 and Technics SP-10 MK2, I use only removable headshell S and J shape tonearms with 15mm on overhang, I use different material build/ shape design /weight headshells. I test each cartridge in at least three different tonearms and some times in 3-4 different headshells till I find the “ right “ match where the cartridge perform the best, no I’m not saying that I already finish or that I already find the “ perfect “ match: cartridge/headshell/tonearm but I think I’m near that ideal target.

Through my testing experience I learn/ confirm that trying to find the right tonearm/headshell for any cartridge is well worth the effort and more important that be changing the TT. When I switch from a TT to another different one the changes on the quality cartridge performance were/are minimal in comparison to a change in the tonearm/headshell, this fact was consistent with any of those cartridges including MC ones.

So after the Phonolinepreamplifier IMHO the tonearm/headshell match for any cartridge is the more important subject, it is so important and complex that in the same tonearm ( with the same headshell wires ) but with different headshell ( even when the headshell weight were the same ) shape or build material headshell the quality cartridge performance can/could be way different.

All those experiences told me that chances are that the cartridge that you own ( MC or MM ) is not performing at its best because chances are that the tonearm you own is not the best match for that cartridge!!!!!!, so imagine what do you can/could hear when your cartridge is or will be on the right tonearm???!!!!!!!!, IMHO there are ( till today ) no single ( any type at any price ) perfect universal tonearm. IMHO there is no “ the best tonearm “, what exist or could exist is a “ best tonearm match for “ that “ cartridge “, but that’s all. Of course that are “ lucky “ tonearms that are very good match for more than one cartridge but don’t for every single cartridge.

I posted several times that I’m not a tonearm collector, that I own all those tonearms to have alternatives for my cartridges and with removable headshells my 15 tonearms are really like 100+ tonearms : a very wide options/alternatives for almost any cartridge!!!!!!

You can find several of these MM type cartridges new brand or NOS like: Ortofon, Nagaoka, Audio Technica, Astatic, B&O, Rega, Empire, Sonus Reson,Goldring,Clearaudio, Grado, Shelter, Garrot, etc. and all of them second hand in very good operational condition. As a fact I buy two and even three cartridges of the same model in some of the cartridges ( so right now I have some samples that I think I don’t use any more. ) to prevent that one of them arrive in non operational condition but I’m glad to say that all them arrive in very fine conditions. I buy one or two of the cartridges with no stylus or with the stylus out of work but I don’t have any trouble because I could find the stylus replacement on different sources and in some case the original new replacement.

All these buy/find cartridges was very time consuming and we have to have a lot of patience and a little lucky to obtain what we are looking for but I can asure you that is worth of it.

Ok, I think it is time to share my performance cartridge findings:

first we have to have a Phonolinepreamplifier with a very good MM phono stage ( at least at the same level that the MC stage. ). I’m lucky because my Phonolinepreamplifier has two independent phono stages, one for the MM and one for MC: both were designed for the specifics needs of each cartridge type, MM or MC that have different needs.

we need a decent TT and decent tonearm.

we have to load the MM cartridges not at 47K but at 100K ( at least 75K not less. ).

I find that using 47K ( a standard manufacture recommendation ) prevent to obtain the best quality performance, 100K make the difference. I try this with all those MM type cartridges and in all of them I achieve the best performance with 100K load impedance.

I find too that using the manufacturer capacitance advise not always is for the better, till “ the end of the day “ I find that between 100-150pf ( total capacitance including cable capacitance. ) all the cartridges performs at its best.

I start to change the load impedance on MM cartridges like a synonymous that what many of us made with MC cartridges where we try with different load impedance values, latter I read on the Empire 4000 DIII that the precise load impedance must be 100kOhms and in a white paper of some Grace F9 tests the used impedance value was 100kOhms, the same that I read on other operational MM cartridge manual and my ears tell/told me that 100kOhms is “ the value “.

Before I go on I want to remember you that several of those MM type cartridges ( almost all ) were build more than 30+ years ago!!!!!!!! and today performs at the same top quality level than today MC/MM top quality cartridges!!!!!, any brand at any price and in some ways beat it.

I use 4-5 recordings that I know very well and that give me the right answers to know that any cartridge is performing at its best or near it. Many times what I heard through those recordings were fine: everything were on target however the music don’t come “ alive “ don’t “ tell me “ nothing, I was not feeling the emotion that the music can communicate. In those cartridge cases I have to try it in other tonearm and/or with a different headshell till the “ feelings comes “ and only when this was achieved I then was satisfied.

All the tests were made with a volume level ( SPL ) where the recording “ shines “ and comes alive like in a live event. Sometimes changing the volume level by 1-1.5 db fixed everything.

Of course that the people that in a regular manner attend to hear/heard live music it will be more easy to know when something is right or wrong.

Well, Raul go on!!: one characteristic on the MM cartridges set-up was that almost all them likes to ride with a positive ( little/small ) VTA only the Grace Ruby and F9E and Sonus Gold Blue likes a negative VTA , on the other hand with the Nagaoka MP 50 Super and the Ortofon’s I use a flat VTA.

Regarding the VTF I use the manufacturer advise and sometimes 0.1+grs.
Of course that I made fine tuning through moderate changes in the Azymuth and for anti-skate I use between half/third VTF value.

I use different material build headshells: aluminum, composite aluminum, magnesium, composite magnesium, ceramic, wood and non magnetic stainless steel, these cartridges comes from Audio Technica, Denon, SAEC, Technics, Fidelity Research, Belldream, Grace, Nagaoka, Koetsu, Dynavector and Audiocraft.
All of them but the wood made ( the wood does not likes to any cartridge. ) very good job . It is here where a cartridge could seems good or very good depending of the headshell where is mounted and the tonearm.
Example, I have hard time with some of those cartridge like the Audio Technica AT 20SS where its performance was on the bright sound that sometimes was harsh till I find that the ceramic headshell was/is the right match now this cartridge perform beautiful, something similar happen with the Nagaoka ( Jeweltone in Japan ), Shelter , Grace, Garrot , AKG and B&O but when were mounted in the right headshell/tonearm all them performs great.

Other things that you have to know: I use two different cooper headshell wires, both very neutral and with similar “ sound “ and I use three different phono cables, all three very neutral too with some differences on the sound performance but nothing that “ makes the difference “ on the quality sound of any of my cartridges, either MM or MC, btw I know extremely well those phono cables: Analysis Plus, Harmonic Technologies and Kimber Kable ( all three the silver models. ), finally and don’t less important is that those phono cables were wired in balanced way to take advantage of my Phonolinepreamp fully balanced design.

What do you note the first time you put your MM cartridge on the record?, well a total absence of noise/hum or the like that you have through your MC cartridges ( and that is not a cartridge problem but a Phonolinepreamp problem due to the low output of the MC cartridges. ), a dead silent black ( beautiful ) soundstage where appear the MUSIC performance, this experience alone is worth it.

The second and maybe the most important MM cartridge characteristic is that you hear/heard the MUSIC flow/run extremely “ easy “ with no distracting sound distortions/artifacts ( I can’t explain exactly this very important subject but it is wonderful ) even you can hear/heard “ sounds/notes “ that you never before heard it and you even don’t know exist on the recording: what a experience!!!!!!!!!!!

IMHO I think that the MUSIC run so easily through a MM cartridge due ( between other facts ) to its very high compliance characteristic on almost any MM cartridge.

This very high compliance permit ( between other things like be less sensitive to out-center hole records. ) to these cartridges stay always in contact with the groove and never loose that groove contact not even on the grooves that were recorded at very high velocity, something that a low/medium cartridge compliance can’t achieve, due to this low/medium compliance characteristic the MC cartridges loose ( time to time and depending of the recorded velocity ) groove contact ( minute extremely minute loose contact, but exist. ) and the quality sound performance suffer about and we can hear it, the same pass with the MC cartridges when are playing the inner grooves on a record instead the very high compliance MM cartridges because has better tracking drive perform better than the MC ones at inner record grooves and here too we can hear it.

Btw, some Agoners ask very worried ( on more than one Agon thread ) that its cartridge can’t track ( clean ) the cannons on the 1812 Telarc recording and usually the answers that different people posted were something like this: “””” don’t worry about other than that Telarc recording no other commercial recording comes recorded at that so high velocity, if you don’t have trouble with other of your LP’s then stay calm. “””””

Well, this standard answer have some “ sense “ but the people ( like me ) that already has/have the experience to hear/heard a MM or MC ( like the Ortofon MC 2000 or the Denon DS1, high compliance Mc cartridges. ) cartridge that pass easily the 1812 Telarc test can tell us that those cartridges make a huge difference in the quality sound reproduction of any “ normal “ recording, so it is more important that what we think to have a better cartridge tracking groove drive!!!!

There are many facts around the MM cartridge subject but till we try it in the right set-up it will be ( for some people ) difficult to understand “ those beauties “. Something that I admire on the MM cartridges is how ( almost all of them ) they handle the frequency extremes: the low bass with the right pitch/heft/tight/vivid with no colorations of the kind “ organic !!” that many non know-how people speak about, the highs neutral/open/transparent/airy believable like the live music, these frequency extremes handle make that the MUSIC flow in our minds to wake up our feelings/emotions that at “ the end of the day “ is all what a music lover is looking for.
These not means that these cartridges don’t shine on the midrange because they do too and they have very good soundstage but here is more system/room dependent.

Well we have a very good alternative on the ( very low price ) MM type cartridges to achieve that music target and I’m not saying that you change your MC cartridge for a MM one: NO, what I’m trying to tell you is that it is worth to have ( as many you can buy/find ) the MM type cartridges along your MC ones

I want to tell you that I can live happy with any of those MM cartridges and I’m not saying with this that all of them perform at the same quality level NO!! what I’m saying is that all of them are very good performers, all of them approach you nearest to the music.

If you ask me which one is the best I can tell you that this will be a very hard “ call “ an almost impossible to decide, I think that I can make a difference between the very good ones and the stellar ones where IMHO the next cartridges belongs to this group:

Audio Technica ATML 170 and 180 OCC, Grado The Amber Tribute, Grace Ruby, Garrot P77, Nagaoka MP-50 Super, B&O MMC2 and MMC20CL, AKG P8ES SuperNova, Reson Reca ,Astatic MF-100 and Stanton LZS 981.

There are other ones that are really near this group: ADC Astrion, Supex MF-100 MK2, Micro Acoustics MA630/830, Empire 750 LTD and 600LAC, Sonus Dimension 5, Astatic MF-200 and 300 and the Acutex 320III.

The other ones are very good too but less refined ones.
I try too ( owned or borrowed for a friend ) the Shure IV and VMR, Music maker 2-3 and Clearaudio Virtuoso/Maestro, from these I could recommended only the Clearaudios the Shure’s and Music Maker are almost mediocre ones performers.
I forgot I try to the B&O Soundsmith versions, well this cartridges are good but are different from the original B&O ( that I prefer. ) due that the Sounsmith ones use ruby cantilevers instead the original B&O sapphire ones that for what I tested sounds more natural and less hi-fi like the ruby ones.

What I learn other that the importance on the quality sound reproduction through MM type cartridges?, well that unfortunately the advance in the design looking for a better quality cartridge performers advance almost nothing either on MM and MC cartridges.

Yes, today we have different/advanced body cartridge materials, different cantilever build materials, different stylus shape/profile, different, different,,,,different, but the quality sound reproduction is almost the same with cartridges build 30+ years ago and this is a fact. The same occur with TT’s and tonearms. Is sad to speak in this way but it is what we have today. Please, I’m not saying that some cartridges designs don’t grow up because they did it, example: Koetsu they today Koetsu’s are better performers that the old ones but against other cartridges the Koetsu ones don’t advance and many old and today cartridges MM/MC beat them easily.

Where I think the audio industry grow-up for the better are in electronic audio items ( like the Phonolinepreamps ), speakers and room treatment, but this is only my HO.

I know that there are many things that I forgot and many other things that we have to think about but what you can read here is IMHO a good point to start.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
rauliruegas

Showing 50 responses by nandric

Dear priso, Actually all metaphors are misleading for the simple

reason that anyone is free to interpret them as he likes.

The ''small wire extension'' at the end of the cantilever tube is

the ''guilty object''. There are also two small srews on this tube

probable meant for tension and centering of the back side of

the cantilever. The end of the tension wire is glued at the end of

the tube. To change the rubber ring one need to disassemble the

whole tension wire construction and pull the the cantilever out

in order to put a new rubber ring behind the magnet. I don't

believe tha anyone can do this. So Raul should explain to

us how Van den Hul acomplished this wonder. BTW we may

compare appels with pears. The EPC 100 may be a different

''animal'' then EPC 205. With different ''animal'' I mean different

rubber ring (grin). I am able to fix my bike but this does not mean

that I can fix my BMW..

Dear pryso, Thanks for the explanation of Fleib's ''Mexican

jumping bean cars''. I thought that he made some insulting

 remark about our Mexican.. Those are actually ''analogous

explanations'' which started as so many other things from the

old Greek, Say: ''Fleib is honest like gold or strong like iron''. But

if Fleib rob a bank or seduce the wife of his best friend we feel

ashemed and try to involve others by statitng: ''who would

believe such things about Fleib?'' Aka: I got it wrong because

everybody  else also deed.

BTW he (Fleib) got ''it'' wrong by quoting J. Carr about tension

wire. Those are rare by MM carts but ''usual'' by MC carts.

One can find those only by the more expesive MM carts.

Our chakster suceed to get all things wrong. Even the

pictures of the beautiful Technics are ''the other way round''.

We are talking about styli and tension wire which are at the

underside of both carts ..Then a re-tip is a ''different animal''

than suspension repair. To change the cantilever/stylus combo

one does not need to disassemble the stylus constructon.

I had the luxury to own two defective 205 styli so I could

afford to disassebmle one of them in order to satisfy my

curiosity about tension wire. I see that our pryso is also

inquisitive guy so my suggestion is to do the same. By

disassembling his 205 he may discover a second small

screw in the tube in which the cantilever is fastened

with this ''damn tension wire''.




Dear Fleib, Because of chakster I am reluctant to use the

phrase ''you are wrong''. But If I would dare I would say that

you are (again) wrong with what J. Carr has actually stated

about tension wire by MM carts as well with your childish

excuse ''it was her decision''. For such statement one need

to be married otherwise nobody will believe such statement.

BTW why should you need excuses? You pretend to always

tell the truth so there is no need, in your case, to make

excuses. Except of course if chakster feels insulted by some

of your ''poetic remarks''. You may even explain to him in

lyrical way the ''art of teasing''.


Dear Raul,

As far as I know you was Axel's customer for years. But you got a conflict about one of his bills and that is why you needed to search for some other re-tipper. BTW you was Van den Hul's customer before Axel. You was also customer by Peter. Why then deed you chose for Axel? Now about his cantilevers and styli. Axel can deliver fine line, two kinds of Shibata and even Gyger II . One can get boron as well beryllium cantilever. So much about ''low quality'' of his styli and cantilevers.

Dear Fleib, My intention was to confess that you are, alas,

always right. In Axel's case you are wrong. The comical part

of Rauls story is that they  both  informed me about

their conflict. So I know all the details but as a Serbian gentlemen

try to avoid gossip. Anyway the reason they, say, parted was

not the quality of Axel's parts or his work. The most of my

re-tips by Axel are with fine line pressure fitted in aluminum

alloy cantilever. I also have two boron cantilevers while my

comrad Don could afford the beryllium. Kowing your sensitivity

regarding cantilevers I can assure you that his boron cantilevers

 are much better than the present kind used by, say, Lyra or

Benz.  I see that you like gossip in contradistinction to me

but I need to correct you. It is not the bucher but the baker

who is the source of all Axel's styli.

Dot's and commas. I was wondering about the question what kind of people get made when other people use dot's instead of commas or the other way round? My other question is what kind of life such persons have if they get angry about such silly questions'? Fleib declared Axel for a nitwit because  he wrote a comma between129 euro and 50 cent. Aka 129,50. From this he concluded that Axel asked 129 K for the Denon in question.. I think he should first check Wikipedia and learn that English and German use of those signs is different. As one say : ''The Devil's in the Details''.  So much for someone who pretend to be always right.

Dear R., As anyone knows those ''rubber rings'' can harden

or soften as function of time. AKG is a dramatic example of

using wrong suspension. They closed the cart production department

because of this blunder. Ikeda and Jan Alearts are the opposite

examples.. I have never heard any complaints about their

suspension. The 205 series rubber ring obviously softened  during

the time since their production and this explains ''low riding''.

You obviously have no problem with ''low riders'' but other have.

That is why they try to do something about that while some

 member even asked your advice about possible cure. You

 advised Van den Hul suggesting the illusion that he Van den

 Hul does such repairs. Van den Hul owns 5 companies and

spend 6 months a year in Ukraine. By Van den Hul one has

no idea who deed the actual repair.

In my ignorance I stated that those 205 carts are irreparable.

I disassembled  my mk 3 stylus and have seen that changing

 the rubber ring is not possible.

You of course know better because you deed this yourself?  

Now regarding my indiscretion about your and Axel conflict.

I deed not mention any details because of confidential character

of this ussue. But your ''shame of you'' reprimand give me

the legitimation to disclouse the details. The bill in question

was $ 6000. Who would order whatever ''refreshment'' for

his carts for such amout of money if one does not trust the

the other party in the contract?

You should not start  this dispute with me with your knowledge of

the real situation . But you are obviously not capable to

 avoid disputs and conflicts. And, you know, I consider Axel

as a friend of my but not you.




 

Dear chakster, We agree at last about something. I was not sure

about ''my'' 2 mm but you confirmed that I was right (grin).

Anyway what we want is the stylus to trace the groove and not

the body to plough the grooves. According to me you have

a problem while according to Raul you don't. Our hobby is unthinkable without dilemmas but your dilemmas are your problem.

I myself am unable to listen to any lowrider because I have the

very strong urge to constantly check the mentioned distance (grin).

To me this is not the right way to enjoy music. .

Mexican oracle and lowriders.

I assume that any member in our forum has at least some idea

about ''optimal VTF''. This is the first parameter which we try to

adjust. The most people will follow recommendation in the user

manual , other will use test records with tracking ability test and start

with, say, 60 microns ''pure'' and  then adjust the rest by listening,

etc. We all know that about 1,5 g is used for the MM and about

2 g for the MC kinds. Those are ''avarage values'' mentioned as

a kind of introduction to the problem of lowriders. If lowriders are

a problem that is. According to me this is a problem .To be more

precise the problem is the rubber suspension  which weakend

or got softened as function of time. According to Raul I am

the problem and not the suspension. Because of my ignorance

I am not able to ''grasp'' that there is no problem called ''low

riders''. Well ignorance is a neccesary condition for learning

while we all seem to have our own ''learning curve''. Because

of this ''learning curiosity'' we may like to know what the

''optimal VTF'' is for the lowriders? According to chakster there

is no ''optimal VTF'' but something we can call ''optimal distance''.

The distance between the cart body and the record . We want

to prevent for some reasons that nothing else except the

stylus touches the record. His beloved 205, mk 4 got from

him a distance of 2mm . If I remember. well. What then about

the optimal VTF? Well if this force was possible there would be

no problem with his 205,mk4. That this is not the case is obvious

because he asked Raul for advice. He got advice to post his

cart to Van den Hul . But why if lowrider is not a problem?

Obviously because of double standars in Mexico. I got advice

to learn and improve my ignorance chakster got advice to

spend money without any indication  about the result. By

Van den Hul one need to pay ''some money'' in advance.

Neither Axel nor Andy were able to do anything to cure

my 205 , mk 3 suspension for which Axel charged nothing

and Andy $100. We in Holland need to pay 250 euro in advance

to our dealers in order to get our carts to ''Van den Hul shop''.


Dear chakster deed you got those 2 mm with 0,5 g or even

more ''force'' on your 205.mk 4?

Dear chakster, I think that you are very optimistic with your

claim  to have made  it ''  clear for everyone'' how tension wire

in your 205 MK 4 looks like. For those who already know how

this ''tube'' with tension wire inside looks like it may be clear

that the end of the tension wire at the end of the tube can be

seen. This is the original state which means that no changes

are made by  this  tension wire. The suspension is the ''other

animal''. Aka the rubber ring which determins the so called

''compliance''. Because this rubber ring softened or weakened

we get lowrider phenomenon. My thesis was that all 205 versions

have this, say, weakness or drawback. However I have no idea

about Technics 100c mk3 . So my general statment about 205

does not apply for 100 c . Only if this model also has the same

rubber ring as the 205 versions this may be the case.

The cantilever by 205 version is glued in the front side of the

(round) magnet and tension wire at the back side of the same

magnet. The rubber ring is fastened just behind this magnet. So

to change the rubber ring tension wire need to be removed such

that the cantilever with magnet and rubber ring can be pulled out.

Axel and Andy were not able to  do this . If Axel could he would

certainly do this for his friend Nandric. But alas . What he deed

with your 100 c I have no idea. But if he fixed your 100 c but

was not able to fix my 205, mk 3 then those are probable

two different animals.

Hi jpjones3318, Welcome by the sub-members part  assumed to

 be ignorant..Those should be not allowed to make general statments

while yours is even more general than my. In my modesty I limited

my statment to 205 kind. That is ALL 205 kinds. I also see that you

like short, clear and strong way to express your thoughts. However

I hate abbreviations for the simple reason that I can't remember

them. So ''what the hell''  does TTDD mean? Besides I am sure

that you will get reprimand from our oracle from Mexico for the

expression ''failure''. Have you overlooked his ''general statement''

about ''lowriders''? Only the ignorant have this problem because

there is no such problem.

Now your question. I am not Hegelian but like his theory about

the ''opposits'' and even more his ''the opposits of the opposits''.

Well hardened or, as other prefer to say, ''dry out'' suspensions

are the opposit of the ''soft one''. If any of my carts can't reach

50 microns tracking ability my psychology refuse to use such

a cart. As you can see I am the opposit of you regarding the

way of writing or, which the same, expressing myself.. As a

lawyer I can't afford your (short) way ...

The case with Andy. The case is that Andy lives in the

neighbourhood of my comrade Don from Idaho. In our

private corrspondence we call each other ''brother''. Well

dispite of this fact Don recommended Andy to me. The other

''case'' is that Don become intermediary this way. I needed

to pay postage to him , then his postage to Andy, then the

postage of Andy to him as well Don's postage back to me.

I think this happened one year or so ago. I forget alas the

postage costs (too many variables) but am sure about those

$100. If you have seen this  ''clear for everyone'' picture of

our ''brother'' chakster you probably noticed the, say, ''tail''

of the tension wire by his 205,mk 4 . My mk 3 is much lesser

as kind but has the same ''tail''. Well both , Axel and Andy

messed with this ''tail'' probably with the intention to tighten

the tension wire. Alas there seems to be no connection

with the real problem which is the rubber ring. The most

MC carts have this damn ''tension wire'' but if the rubber

ring is the cause of the problem then this ring need to be

changed. Well this seems to be the usual practice. Now

 speaking of ''generality'' in general.  This practice can be

 also subsummed (aka ''included'')  by the most general

expression  used in our forum: ''refreshment''.

Dear Comradicule Fleib, Why do you assume that I as a foreigner

can understand your ''twisted English''? Is this the consequence

of American imperialitic ambitions? Have you ever seen Chinese

or Japanese English? Do you understand the expression ''mercy''?

You should write in ''plain English'' such that even Mexicans can

understand what you are talking about. No wonder you have so

many disputes with our Mexican.


Addendum. Well speaking about Raul I forget to mention his

other general expression ,namely ''distortions''. His ''refreshment''

and ''distortions'' are all we need. for better understanding of

our hobby. For all carts problems the solution is  their

''refreshment''. Alas there is no solution for distortions but this

expression can help us to understand the problems. What we

need in addition is a kind of vivisection or elaboration in sub-

distortion kinds such that we can ask each other: ''what kind of

distortions do you like''? It is obvious that we need more than one

in order to answer  this question.

Hi jpjones3318, Thanks for your eloquent and exact explanation.

In my Hegelian approach with those ''opposits'' there are ''dampers''

which are defective and those which are ok. The most people make

this distinction. Those things which are not ok are assumed to be

defective. However the philosoper among us will try to make

more differentiate distinctions for, as this is called, ''sake of

argument''. This way we get more in between differentiations

such that nobody can say which is which in Hegelian sense.

This is called ''political correctness''. at present. My remarks in

my response to Fleib about Chinese, Japanese and Mixicans

are typical examples of the , uh, the opposite.  So you  will I

hope understand that .can't agree with your ''degrees of failure''.

This way my dear ...jones... the concept of guilt and wrong doing

will be lost (grin). 

Hi all, We exchange our opinions as well our experience.. This

is the sense of our forum. Is there one single person in our

forum who got the suspension of  his 205 fixed?

If so this person should name the ''re-tipper'' who performed

this wonder. Chakster and jpjones are obvious admirer of

those Technics carts and spend much money to obtain them.

We all have our own ''champions'' for which we search and

try to get willing , of course, to spend much money to get them.

But if we were warrned by our co-members that our ''champion''

has serious shortcoming we would prevent not only loosing

money but also our disappointment. Who is not able to

imagine the ''euphoria'' to have at last obtained this rare

205,mk 4 ? One can as easylly imagine the frustration and

disappointment with ''colapsed suspension''.

Should chakster not wait till such person ''disclose'' himself

instead to pay those ''charges in advance'' without any idea

about the outcome?

Hi chakster, One need to read your post very careful. Otherwise

one would ask: ''why is he asking advice  about some possible

retipper for his 205,mk 4 when he already knows the right person?''

Aka Alex.  Well you made the distinction between ''only suspension''

versus ''cantilever/suspension combo''. Assuming boron for the

cantilever + shibata we are talking about 500 euro. ''Only suspension''

 is probably not an ''economical proposition''.

As I wrote Axel deed not charge me for my 205, mk3 but he deed

not fix the suspension. From this I concluded that he was not

able to fix the suspension. My added reason was that Andy was

also not able to fix the suspension. I assume that you assume

different charges for ''only suspension'' and that is why you ask

for other opportunities. I usualy speak with Alex by phone because

he has no time to read emails. I will ask why ''some chakster''

got better treatment than his friend Nandric (grin).

Dear chakster, I grow up in a socialistic/communistic country

and learned from comrad Lenin that ''knowledge means power''.

From this extended so called ''Raul's thread'' I learned that

knowledge means ''profit''. All carts ''of the month'' which I

sold I sold with profit.. I am not sure what bread or meat cost

but know the prices of unbelievable many cartridges.. From Axel

I learned years ago that Foxtan  is his customer even better

than Raul (grin). So I never bought anything from Foxtan.

I am not sure if savings is equvalent to profit but ''it'' feels

the same.way.

Looking at those prices which Dominic charges I feel like

a rich guy. Many of my carts I got for less money , carts

which don't need any fixing or repair. Thanks to my

knowledge about cart prices.

However I still think that you are confused regarding the

distinction between suspension and tension wire. This

is the force of language. The most people think that ''meaning''

and reality are the same. However languge is , as Raul is

used to say '' in one side'' and reality ''in the other side''.

The names are supposed to refer to ''objects'' on the other

side such that every name needs a bearer. Consider the

sense of attributing properties to not existing beings.

Only kids will believe that their uncle Don or Nikola hunted

unicorns in Africa or have riden the hors with wings named

Pegasus. I think that expression ''tension'' in ''tension wire''

causes this confusion.

Now to end with a comical note. For Diminics prices you can

buy a ''new 205,mk 4'' and get an whole collection of those

remarcable carts all with suspension problems. I fear that

your ''brother John'' already owns such a collection.

Some P&R for my friend Axel. As a kind of intriduction I need

to state that all cart manufacturers as well as re-tippers depend

from their supplier for the needed parts. If those Japanese

producers of styli and cantilevers have a monopoly position they

can charge what they like for their parts as well select their

customers. Axel told me that they increased their prices with

100 % without any consultation. He needed to increase his prices

and was very much disturbed because of that. BTW for comparison sake

 with Dominic's prices he charge for an EMT rubber ring

180 euro. That is what  I paid for my EMT DTS 15.

Nobody is willing to deliver coils to him. So Axel invented his

own solution. He buys second hand carts as donor for the

carts of his customers. That is how he fixed the Dyna of my

ex-compatriot Chris from Canada. My own Sony XL 88 D will

be fixed in the same way . Despite Mori san statement that this

cart is irreperable. Mori san make those Jico SAS styli for

Jico while my brother Don got this info from his acquantance by

Jico. To reduce the amount of work he was confronted with he

sold the B&O part of his company to his assistent. This part

''consumed'' the half of his working time such that from 1

April he can spend all his time for other carts. This imply

shorter waiting time for us.

Dear Fleib, I think that you substituted ''Britain rules the waves''

for ''America rules the waves''. The so called ''intellectual propery''

includes many things among which also the pantent law. In

Europe we have a kind of common patent law but elsewhere the

rule is  anybody on its own. The problem is not so much the

legislation but the implementation. Think of Japanese ''innovations''

which were actually imitations of Western products. What deed

America then? The same as at present against China: protest.

One can implement American laws in America but not in China.

What I can do ''to free up the stilus business"? Well I wrote

4 emails to Ogura and Namiki asking kindly if they would

be so kind to sell their ''micro ridge'' styli to my friend Axel

but never got any response. J.Carr who provided their

addresses warned me only about their English. ..

Well I warned you about your English but don't  see any

result (grin).

Hi kcc 123, I used the more general term ''not economical proposition''

for the re-tippers to spend so much time in order

to fix the suspension. One need to first remove the tension wire

to get the cantilever/magnet/ rubber ring out. This is the only way

in order to exchange the rubber ring. But when this is done the

reverse procedure is needed. Getting the tension wire back and

then centering and tighteining this wire. No wonder Mr. Peng

needed the whole day to fix the suspension.

I agree with my comrade Fleib that Chinese are capable to produce

whatever they want. They must have ''optical industry'' because of

their military ambitions. Our problem is to find out who produces

styli and cantilevers. Those are usualy sold as combos. Andreoli

who learned the trade by brothers Bross in Australia mentioned

that he was able to change cantilever/stylus combo in 5 minutes

time..I have no idea how many styli or cantilever/styli combos

the re-tippers need or keep in their stock. From this amount it

will depend if their demand is interesting for the (Chinese)

producer. I also agree with Fleib's assumption that cart producers

have a better negotiation position.

Dear chakster, You should not think with your amigdale but

with your frontal lobe. Otherwise Raul will question your

''learning curve''. BTW he was very happy with your confirmation

of his theory that ''low riders'' don't exist. You stated that your

205. mk 4 ''sounds fine''. Why than are you asking for address

of Mr.Lau Sang? As Mr. Sang stated he needed an whole day

to fix kcc's suspension. Even with Chinese wages this would

imply ''mucho dollars'' . Besides his first attempt was probably

caused by his curiousity and not by his intention to earn money

by fixing 205 series suspensions. Even more confusing is your

earlier statment that Axel fixed your ''cantilever/suspension''

problem already. Why should you then prefer an unknown

Chinese above an known German?

Dear chakster, The Germans have this saying: ''Wein , Weiber

und Gesang'' (wine, women and music). So your invitation to

drink some wine and compare cartridges together looks to

me very attractive. At my age the ''third party'' is, alas, not very

probable, but one never knows in advance. However I hope that

your invitation does not imply ''comparing the low riders''?

 I already stated: ''don't mess with 205 series''. This position

would be contradictory with ''comparing the low riders'' even if

your wine is for free.

 

Dear chakster, I just got an nude shibata ''married'' with an boron

cantilever  for 600 euro. I think that I would be much cheaper out in

''your bar''. I at last found what I was looking for  all this time. 4

exceptional MC carts. To listen to whatever else looks to me as

a waste of time . Considering my age that is (grin). To keep all those

carts in my cabinet is senseless but by selling them other can enjoy

them.

Dear chakster, I hate all nomenclature of the cart manufacturers.

The reason is my memory. For each , say, AT cart I need to ask my

brother Don for information. He is like our Professor in this regard.

I don't believe that I mentioned Bonetti as Italian importer (?). I got

2 of those ''Azzurra'' from my Italian friend (dealer) Valerio. One

for my brother Don the other for me. But I never try this cart because

of my prejudice against conical styli. From the user manual which

was/is included by my MFG 31 L I would say that Azzurra is MFG 11R .

BTW I lost any interest in MM carts  and try to get rid of them. If you

are willing to pay for the postage you can get my  Azzurra for free

( nikola et andric dot com) My assumption is that (nearly) all Glanz

carts have the same generator but different styli and complience.

So if Jico produces Glanz/ Astatic styli one can make a ''decent''

cart from this Azzurra (grin).

Dear chakster, Logic and hobby seldom coincide. So while I

lost interest in MM carts I am still curious about them in a

kind of abstract way. Despite my membership and participation

in the MM thread since 2007 I have never heard about this

Pioneer PC 1000. So I checked your story. You ''forget'' to

 mention the price. For 400 euro, my dear chakster, one can

 get at present even an decent MC cart (grin).

This remind me about Peter who was always complaining about his

shoes. ''What is wrong with them?'' question was answered with:

''they are too small''. ''But why don't you buy bigger shoes?''

''Well it feels so good whan I take them off''.

Why should anyone buy MM carts which need 100K Ohms while

his phono-pre has only 47 K Ohms ? Our Lew has no time to listen

to his cart collection (the most are virginal) because he is soldering

resitors back and fort all the time (grin).

Dear chakster, You are an very fast learning novice but I must

confess not to have expected to learn whatever from you. Typical

prejudice. In science all sources are welcom and there are no

privileged kinds. My prejudice has probaly something to do with

the diffrence between the ''old members'' and the ''new one''.

The older kind assumes some privileges in relation to the youngsters.

 Anyway Raul should be proud about your ''learning

curve''. I was not sure what to think about those SUT's despite

the lessons I got from Dertonarm and other persons belonging

to the so called ''German groep''. I was scared by the proposition

to buy a specific SUT for every MC cart that I own (about 40). 

I have heard about this new Pope Salvatore but was not very

much impressed with his opinions. But now that I own one SUT

my perspective changed. I started to like the guy. I like every

person who is praising my stuff. Anyway thanks for the reference.

Well I owned both but our hearing memory is not realiable. So I

have only indirect ''proof''. I sold the MK 1 but kept the MK 2.

Either because the Mk 2 looks better or sounds better.

Hi florence4, If the devil is in the details then Raul is right. My X1,mk2 is Victor without prefix ''JVC''. However our member Don(Griffiths) made the real discovery. Namely the Victor Z-1 S with Jico SAS stylus. According to me nearly as good as the MK2. According to Don , Fleib (?) and some Aussie(?) as good as the MK2. This means an top MM cart for cheap. My sample is available for the price of the SAS stylus. I prefer MC kinds and keep only the real top of the MM kinds.

Dear Florence, As you can see the price does not matter for

Raul. That is probably why we have not seen one single new cart

from him since he come back to this thread as well why he is

selling his whole collection of carts. He is an expert in double

moral.

Raul was ''of course'' the first who mentioned Victor X1 , sorry,

JVC-Victor X1 . But it took me two years to find one. The price

was $600. To put this in some kind of context I will tell you the

story about my dad. He asked the farmer for the price of 1 kg

tomatoes. ''1$ was the answer ''. My dad: ''you probably think that

I am Rockefeller''. Well the SAS stylus may be lesser then Victor's

X1 but in combo with Z-1 its price is nearly as cheap as those

tomatoes (grin). For those who are not Rockefellers this may be

an intersting proposition.  Thanks to my comrad Don that is. Raul

discovered the JVC X1,  Don discovered Z-1 / SAS combo.

Hi florence4, I mentioned Z-1 SAS stylus but those are not

anymore produced. The new Jico is ''neo SAS'' with sapphire

cantilever while the old one was boron. The stylus should be

the same because  ''SAS'' is the sign for their stylus shape.

''Brands'' or ''trademarks'' belong to the so called ''intellectual

property'' which is registered and protected according to the

''national laws''. My Basis Exclusive for example has different

''brand name'' in Germany than abroad. The more dramatic example

is the old Kondo san who made an (gentleman?) agreement with

some British company which registered his trademark ''Audio Note''

in the UK and still produces its own stuff under Kondo's brand name.

Some think that Kondo san die premature because of this theft.

So, obviously, the names ''VICTOR'' and/or ''JVC'' are connected

with this ''international problem''.

  

Dear jpjones3318, Nice way out but alas. ''Most'' and ''nearly all''

are like two eggs. Anyway logicaly there is no diffrence between

them. But I think that ''our quantifiers'' (most and nearly all ) are

sufficient warning  for our co members. Except for chakster ?

Dear chakster, You won the dispute with Nandric, congratulation!

That is to say according to the modern logic of quantification.

I stated that ALL 205 versions have defective suspension. Well

according to logic if one sample is ok than the whole statement is

false. I  should use the quantifier MOST instead for which there is

no logical rule. However the fact that you sold all your 205mk4 and

100mk3 is suspect because those belong to the best MM carts

ever made. If you are sporty you should mention the real reason

why you sold them.

Dear chakater, I use the same method since I become member in

2007. So how could I  blame  you for the same sin? However with MM carts I usually made some profit while with MC carts the situation is very different. I need to accommodate to losing money instead of making profit (grin). My personal tragedy is that I prefer MC carts.

I wish I was like you and Halcro (?) . My other probem is that I got

used to the MC prices and have serious difficulty to sell my best

MM carts for prices bellow $500.  So I am ''forced'' to keep them despite the fact that I don't use them. What a hobby do we have?

This looks more like suffering than enjoyment (grin).

jpjones, I retipped more as 20 MC carts and just one MM cart.

All of them by my friend Axel. Why just one MM cart? Well I

checked how this is done. A new cantilever/stylus combo is glued

on the remainder of the original cantilever and that is all. I have

no idea how the suspension of the MM carts can be fixed. Look

at the thing and imagine how this can be done. So my strategy

by MM carts was either a new stylus or don't bother. This is

different by the MC carts. All of them have the so called ''joint

pipe'' on which coils , suspension and cantilever are fastened

(aka ''glued''). One can see that behind those ''exotic cantilevers'''

an ''aluminum tube'' is connected with this ''joint pipe''. Anyway

the whole ''generator'' can be disassembled and put together

afterwards. The only problem are the coils. If those are defective

it is very difficult to fix them. That is why the most retippers refuse

to repair them. My, say ''chakster strategy'' was to buy defective

MC carts for cheap and then post them to Axel for retip. Afterwards

I was able to chose either to keep them or sell them . Or so I

thought. That is how I got +40 MC carts and have no idea what to

do with them. Selling those carts is not as easy a I thought. Besides

those retips become shameless expensive at present.  

Dear chakster, learning from experience or rather from our errors

imply not to repeat the same faults. You are probably not aware

that you are repeating Raul's ''carts of the year''. Searching for

those was an frustrating experience. I needed two years to find

this damn JVC , X1 . The curious thing is the fact, or rather despite

this fact that I collected + 40 MM carts while I always prefered the

MC kind. Not to stay behind was the obvious reason. The common

curiousity of all those ''carts of the year'' was the (nearly) imposibility

to find them. If we understand your post as recommendation then

you should also inform us where those carts can be find. "Us''

is meant as the way of speaking. I am busy to get rid of my MM

carts.

Dear Chakster &Fleib, One need some running start in order

to jump. We all learned from Raul's thread by imitation but

after some time when we ''grasped'' all the involved skills we started

our own ''hunting''. You are the typical example while you already

got my compliment of being the fastest student in our forum. As

you know Raul hardly recommended any MC cart so I was on

my own in search for those. The MM adventure was (nearly) for

free if one was fast with ''jumping'' (grin). Actually I made some

profit by (re)selling MM carts and needed to accept ''some loss''

with my MC adventure. So (Fleib) I obviously can afford something

or other. How about you and Raul? Raul, say, nr. 1 spend huge

amount of money for those ''carts of the week'' but we have seen

hardly any from Raul nr.2 (the one who come back). So Chakster

is his legitimate succesor. However one need to invest for the glory

as both Raul and Chakster demonstrate(d). I don't believe that

Chakster's ''hunting'' is over so we will see more discoveries.

''The king is dead long live the King!''


Dear Fleib, Your explanation is consistent with Klyne's assumptions

by his 7 PX 3,5 RIAA phono-preamp. His filters to dampen high

frequency resonaces he calls ''h.fr. contour'' while the choice is

for 15,20,30,35 and 40 Khz. BTW there are 4 amplification choices

from 37 , 50, 63 and 67 dB. What is more he made adjustment

recommendations for 26 MC carts with impedance of either 1000

or 47 K ohms. I was used to follow Scheafer (ASR Basis Exclusive)

with the ''rule'' of 10 x the cart impedance. The problem with those

damn adjustments is that one is never sure . So instead to listen

to the music one is continuous thinking about adjustments.

I think that my Greek brother become desprate because of this

uncertainty. In my case my own lazines is my salvation.

I own the 20 CL and 6000. The 6000 is the only B&O with berylium

cantilever and ''unbelievable'' technical performance. Next to this

adapter B&O produced an headshell with the same in-klik provision

as by the adapter. However there are no other adjustment

possibilites while the headshell is too short . The intriguing question

 is how is it possible that the same company which produced such

delicate carts can produce  such worthless ''connectors''.

Hi bimasta, You should ask Raul about specifics regarding AKG

carts. He knows the most about them. He also owns the best

ever AKG which is produced in very limited numbers. I am not aware

that those have any suspension problem.  Alas those are impossible

to get second hand.

AKG closed its cart production and destroyed their whole stock

of carts and parts in order to avoid liabilty . The suspension material

was not resistant to environmemental influences so there are hardly

any samples without defective suspension. However Axel Schurholz,

the well known retipper , offered repair for some of the AKG versions.

While I still own 3 samples of those AKG's I never try Axel's

offerings. Van den Hul styli which were used for the ''top AKG's''

are only available by Van den Hul who does not offer repair for

AKG 's. However Gyger styli are identical with Van den Huls

because those are(were) made by Gyger. Axel's price for the

Gyger 2 is around 500 euro. This explains my reluctance to mess

with AKG.  


Hi bimasta, While I think that Raul is very sensitive for flattering he

is even more interested in demonstrating his knowledge and

believe in distortions. So it should not matter if he likes you or

not . The paradox is the amount of contributions  in his own thread.

He can't react at  all of them. Even the Mexican needs some

sleep.

Dear Fleib, ''It's interesting to compare properties of the various

cantilevers now available''. J. Carr was talking in general about

properties relevant for the cantilevers. I.e. about advantages and

disadvantages of different mateials. In this context he stated that

the advantage of aluminum (alloy) is the fact that the stylus can

be pressure fitted while in all other the stylus must be glued.

However all cart producers are dependant from  styli/cantilever

producer which are very few at present. As you mentioned so often

in the 80is much more superiour cantilevers were produced then

at present. Not only (tubed) beryllium but also ''tubed'' boron

pipes were made. Neither is available at present. One can see

variations of sapphire cantilevers but Carr deed not like them.

He deed not like how they sound but should also have objective

reasons in the sense of properties reg. the question why.

I , for example, noticed that he uses the same boron/stylus combo

as Benz by LP S and Ruby 3. I own many MC from the 80is with

thiner cantilevers than at present available. The paradox is then

that we see astronomical prices for carts with mediocre cantilevers.

Hi chakster, The Azzura is ordered by Glanz but there is no

reference to any Glanz model. However I own the manual

provided by my Glanz 31 L. According to which the most versions

have the same generator. That is to say that the only difference is

the stylus and complience. You can try the stylus of your 31 l in the

Azzura and ''see'' if you can hear any difference. I got two samples

from my Italian friend Valerio for free. My comrade Don got one and

you the other as present. I never tested this one because I owned

all Glanz top carts.

Van den Hul never produced any stylus. But he deed design 3

kinds for Gyger and ''obviously'' stipulated by contract the right to

 sell them under his own brand name. However we have never

heard about Van den Hul I, II and S while Gygers are so marked.

The first two (I &2) were difficult to produce (aka ''polish'') so

the they settled on the ''S'' . Benz used the ''S'' for a ong time

byt recently moved to the ''micro ridge'' while, as far as I know,

Allearts still uses the ''S''.

The ''Gyger story'' was told in the German Magazine ''LP''.

Van den Hul desribed his styli dimensions elswhere .

I am not impressed by the styli shapes. Anyway I am not able to

''deduce'' enything from this , say, ''criterion''. I am very fond of

 FR-7 kinds the most of which have conical stylus. I am also very

impressed by Andreoli's Magic Diamond which is also provided

with conical stylus. Then I own Sony XL 88 and 44 L which use

''super elliptical'' (Raul is very fond of the 44 btw) . Then I own

different Kiseki's (the Blue, the Silverspot and the Goldspot) which

all use ''super elliptical''. And last but not least the Miyabi Standard

with aluminum cantilever while I have no idea nor  do I care what

kind of stylus this one has.

  

Dear chakster, I checked my sample for comparisson sake and

found your first test as separate document included in the box

while your second measuring example is included in the user

manual. The output of my sample is: 3,4 mV L.channel and 3,2

mV R. channel. In the user manual both channels are ''idendical'':

3,3 mV. So there are obvious deviations in output which are not

expressed in dB's but in mV. This may implay the need for an

Left-Right volume ''regulator'' which is seldom to find in a phono-

pre but well in (some?) pre-amps.

Why should any manufacturer produce MM carts for other

load than 47 K which all MM phono-pres use? This make no

sense to me. On the other side there are many people who

like to experiment in the hope to ''improve'' the sound of their

carts by changing the load. In order to justify their efforts they

then invent ''improvements''.


Hi chakster, I should check in advance instead of afterwards (grin).

See Raul's post from 01-22-2013. Back then this Precept was

Raul's  reference MM cart.