Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC?


Dear friends: who really needs an MM type phono cartridge?, well I will try to share/explain with you what are my experiences about and I hope too that many of you could enrich the topic/subject with your own experiences.

For some years ( in this forum ) and time to time I posted that the MM type cartridge quality sound is better than we know or that we think and like four months ago I start a thread about: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1173550723&openusid&zzRauliruegas&4&5#Rauliruegas where we analyse some MM type cartridges.

Well, in the last 10-12 months I buy something like 30+ different MM type phono cartridges ( you can read in my virtual system which ones. ) and I’m still doing it. The purpose of this fact ( “ buy it “ ) is for one way to confirm or not if really those MM type cartridges are good for us ( music lovers ) and at the same time learn about MM vs MC cartridges, as a fact I learn many things other than MM/MC cartridge subject.

If we take a look to the Agon analog members at least 90% of them use ( only ) MC phono cartridges, if we take a look to the “ professional reviewers “ ( TAS, Stereophile, Positive Feedback, Enjoy the Music, etc, etc, ) 95% ( at least ) of them use only MC cartridges ( well I know that for example: REG and NG of TAS and RJR of Stereophile use only MM type cartridges!!!!!!!! ) , if we take a look to the phono cartridge manufacturers more than 90% of them build/design for MC cartridges and if you speak with audio dealers almost all will tell you that the MC cartridges is the way to go.

So, who are wrong/right, the few ( like me ) that speak that the MM type is a very good alternative or the “ whole “ cartridge industry that think and support the MC cartridge only valid alternative?

IMHO I think that both groups are not totally wrong/right and that the subject is not who is wrong/right but that the subject is : KNOW-HOW or NON KNOW-HOW about.

Many years ago when I was introduced to the “ high end “ the cartridges were almost MM type ones: Shure, Stanton, Pickering, Empire, etc, etc. In those time I remember that one dealer told me that if I really want to be nearest to the music I have to buy the Empire 4000 D ( they say for 4-channel reproduction as well. ) and this was truly my first encounter with a “ high end cartridge “, I buy the 4000D I for 70.00 dls ( I can’t pay 150.00 for the D III. ), btw the specs of these Empire cartridges were impressive even today, look: frequency response: 5-50,000Hz, channel separation: 35db, tracking force range: 0.25grs to 1.25grs!!!!!!!!, just impressive, but there are some cartridges which frequency response goes to 100,000Hz!!!!!!!!!!

I start to learn about and I follow to buying other MM type cartridges ( in those times I never imagine nothing about MC cartridges: I don’t imagine of its existence!!!. ) like AKG, Micro Acoustics, ADC, B&O, Audio Technica, Sonus, etc, etc.

Years latter the same dealer told me about the MC marvelous cartridges and he introduce me to the Denon-103 following with the 103-D and the Fulton High performance, so I start to buy and hear MC cartridges. I start to read audio magazines about either cartridge type: MM and Mc ones.

I have to make changes in my audio system ( because of the low output of the MC cartridges and because I was learning how to improve the performance of my audio system ) and I follow what the reviewers/audio dealers “ speak “ about, I was un-experienced !!!!!!!, I was learning ( well I’m yet. ).

I can tell you many good/bad histories about but I don’t want that the thread was/is boring for you, so please let me tell you what I learn and where I’m standing today about:

over the years I invested thousands of dollars on several top “ high end “ MC cartridges, from the Sumiko Celebration passing for Lyras, Koetsu, Van denHul, to Allaerts ones ( just name it and I can tell that I own or owned. ), what I already invest on MC cartridges represent almost 70-80% price of my audio system.

Suddenly I stop buying MC cartridges and decide to start again with some of the MM type cartridges that I already own and what I heard motivate me to start the search for more of those “ hidden jewels “ that are ( here and now ) the MM phono cartridges and learn why are so good and how to obtain its best quality sound reproduction ( as a fact I learn many things other than MM cartridge about. ).

I don’t start this “ finding “ like a contest between MC and MM type cartridges.
The MC cartridges are as good as we already know and this is not the subject here, the subject is about MM type quality performance and how achieve the best with those cartridges.

First than all I try to identify and understand the most important characteristics ( and what they “ means “. ) of the MM type cartridges ( something that in part I already have it because our phonolinepreamp design needs. ) and its differences with the MC ones.

Well, first than all is that are high output cartridges, very high compliance ones ( 50cu is not rare. ), low or very low tracking force ones, likes 47kOhms and up, susceptible to some capacitance changes, user stylus replacement, sometimes we can use a different replacement stylus making an improvement with out the necessity to buy the next top model in the cartridge line , low and very low weight cartridges, almost all of them are build of plastic material with aluminum cantilever and with eliptical or “ old “ line contact stylus ( shibata ) ( here we don’t find: Jade/Coral/Titanium/etc, bodies or sophisticated build material cantilevers and sophisticated stylus shape. ), very very… what I say? Extremely low prices from 40.00 to 300.00 dls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, well one of my cartridges I buy it for 8.99 dls ( one month ago ): WOW!!!!!!, so any one of you can/could have/buy ten to twenty MM cartridges for the price of one of the MC cartridge you own today and the good notice is that is a chance that those 10-20 MM type cartridges even the quality performance of your MC cartridge or beat it.

Other characteristics is that the builders show how proud they were/are on its MM type cartridges design, almost all those cartridges comes with a first rate box, comes with charts/diagrams of its frequency response and cartridge channel separation ( where they tell us which test recording use it, with which VTF, at which temperature, etc, etc. ), comes with a very wide explanation of the why’s and how’s of its design and the usual explanation to mount the cartridge along with a very wide list of specifications ( that were the envy of any of today MC ones where sometimes we really don’t know nothing about. ), comes with a set of screws/nuts, comes with a stylus brush and even with stylus cleaning fluid!!!!!!!!!, my GOD. Well, there are cartridges like the Supex SM 100MK2 that comes with two different stylus!!!! One with spherical and one with elliptical/shibata shape and dear friends all those in the same low low price!!!!!!!!!!!

Almost all the cartridges I own you can find it through Ebay and Agon and through cartridge dealers and don’t worry if you loose/broke the stylus cartridge or you find the cartridge but with out stylus, you always can/could find the stylus replacement, no problem about there are some stylus and cartridge sources.

When I’m talking about MM type cartridges I’m refer to different types: moving magnet, moving iron, moving flux, electret, variable reluctance, induced magnet, etc, etc. ( here is not the place to explain the differences on all those MM type cartridges. Maybe on other future thread. ).

I made all my very long ( time consuming ) cartridge tests using four different TT’s: Acoustic Signature Analog One MK2, Micro Seiki RX-5000, Luxman PD 310 and Technics SP-10 MK2, I use only removable headshell S and J shape tonearms with 15mm on overhang, I use different material build/ shape design /weight headshells. I test each cartridge in at least three different tonearms and some times in 3-4 different headshells till I find the “ right “ match where the cartridge perform the best, no I’m not saying that I already finish or that I already find the “ perfect “ match: cartridge/headshell/tonearm but I think I’m near that ideal target.

Through my testing experience I learn/ confirm that trying to find the right tonearm/headshell for any cartridge is well worth the effort and more important that be changing the TT. When I switch from a TT to another different one the changes on the quality cartridge performance were/are minimal in comparison to a change in the tonearm/headshell, this fact was consistent with any of those cartridges including MC ones.

So after the Phonolinepreamplifier IMHO the tonearm/headshell match for any cartridge is the more important subject, it is so important and complex that in the same tonearm ( with the same headshell wires ) but with different headshell ( even when the headshell weight were the same ) shape or build material headshell the quality cartridge performance can/could be way different.

All those experiences told me that chances are that the cartridge that you own ( MC or MM ) is not performing at its best because chances are that the tonearm you own is not the best match for that cartridge!!!!!!, so imagine what do you can/could hear when your cartridge is or will be on the right tonearm???!!!!!!!!, IMHO there are ( till today ) no single ( any type at any price ) perfect universal tonearm. IMHO there is no “ the best tonearm “, what exist or could exist is a “ best tonearm match for “ that “ cartridge “, but that’s all. Of course that are “ lucky “ tonearms that are very good match for more than one cartridge but don’t for every single cartridge.

I posted several times that I’m not a tonearm collector, that I own all those tonearms to have alternatives for my cartridges and with removable headshells my 15 tonearms are really like 100+ tonearms : a very wide options/alternatives for almost any cartridge!!!!!!

You can find several of these MM type cartridges new brand or NOS like: Ortofon, Nagaoka, Audio Technica, Astatic, B&O, Rega, Empire, Sonus Reson,Goldring,Clearaudio, Grado, Shelter, Garrot, etc. and all of them second hand in very good operational condition. As a fact I buy two and even three cartridges of the same model in some of the cartridges ( so right now I have some samples that I think I don’t use any more. ) to prevent that one of them arrive in non operational condition but I’m glad to say that all them arrive in very fine conditions. I buy one or two of the cartridges with no stylus or with the stylus out of work but I don’t have any trouble because I could find the stylus replacement on different sources and in some case the original new replacement.

All these buy/find cartridges was very time consuming and we have to have a lot of patience and a little lucky to obtain what we are looking for but I can asure you that is worth of it.

Ok, I think it is time to share my performance cartridge findings:

first we have to have a Phonolinepreamplifier with a very good MM phono stage ( at least at the same level that the MC stage. ). I’m lucky because my Phonolinepreamplifier has two independent phono stages, one for the MM and one for MC: both were designed for the specifics needs of each cartridge type, MM or MC that have different needs.

we need a decent TT and decent tonearm.

we have to load the MM cartridges not at 47K but at 100K ( at least 75K not less. ).

I find that using 47K ( a standard manufacture recommendation ) prevent to obtain the best quality performance, 100K make the difference. I try this with all those MM type cartridges and in all of them I achieve the best performance with 100K load impedance.

I find too that using the manufacturer capacitance advise not always is for the better, till “ the end of the day “ I find that between 100-150pf ( total capacitance including cable capacitance. ) all the cartridges performs at its best.

I start to change the load impedance on MM cartridges like a synonymous that what many of us made with MC cartridges where we try with different load impedance values, latter I read on the Empire 4000 DIII that the precise load impedance must be 100kOhms and in a white paper of some Grace F9 tests the used impedance value was 100kOhms, the same that I read on other operational MM cartridge manual and my ears tell/told me that 100kOhms is “ the value “.

Before I go on I want to remember you that several of those MM type cartridges ( almost all ) were build more than 30+ years ago!!!!!!!! and today performs at the same top quality level than today MC/MM top quality cartridges!!!!!, any brand at any price and in some ways beat it.

I use 4-5 recordings that I know very well and that give me the right answers to know that any cartridge is performing at its best or near it. Many times what I heard through those recordings were fine: everything were on target however the music don’t come “ alive “ don’t “ tell me “ nothing, I was not feeling the emotion that the music can communicate. In those cartridge cases I have to try it in other tonearm and/or with a different headshell till the “ feelings comes “ and only when this was achieved I then was satisfied.

All the tests were made with a volume level ( SPL ) where the recording “ shines “ and comes alive like in a live event. Sometimes changing the volume level by 1-1.5 db fixed everything.

Of course that the people that in a regular manner attend to hear/heard live music it will be more easy to know when something is right or wrong.

Well, Raul go on!!: one characteristic on the MM cartridges set-up was that almost all them likes to ride with a positive ( little/small ) VTA only the Grace Ruby and F9E and Sonus Gold Blue likes a negative VTA , on the other hand with the Nagaoka MP 50 Super and the Ortofon’s I use a flat VTA.

Regarding the VTF I use the manufacturer advise and sometimes 0.1+grs.
Of course that I made fine tuning through moderate changes in the Azymuth and for anti-skate I use between half/third VTF value.

I use different material build headshells: aluminum, composite aluminum, magnesium, composite magnesium, ceramic, wood and non magnetic stainless steel, these cartridges comes from Audio Technica, Denon, SAEC, Technics, Fidelity Research, Belldream, Grace, Nagaoka, Koetsu, Dynavector and Audiocraft.
All of them but the wood made ( the wood does not likes to any cartridge. ) very good job . It is here where a cartridge could seems good or very good depending of the headshell where is mounted and the tonearm.
Example, I have hard time with some of those cartridge like the Audio Technica AT 20SS where its performance was on the bright sound that sometimes was harsh till I find that the ceramic headshell was/is the right match now this cartridge perform beautiful, something similar happen with the Nagaoka ( Jeweltone in Japan ), Shelter , Grace, Garrot , AKG and B&O but when were mounted in the right headshell/tonearm all them performs great.

Other things that you have to know: I use two different cooper headshell wires, both very neutral and with similar “ sound “ and I use three different phono cables, all three very neutral too with some differences on the sound performance but nothing that “ makes the difference “ on the quality sound of any of my cartridges, either MM or MC, btw I know extremely well those phono cables: Analysis Plus, Harmonic Technologies and Kimber Kable ( all three the silver models. ), finally and don’t less important is that those phono cables were wired in balanced way to take advantage of my Phonolinepreamp fully balanced design.

What do you note the first time you put your MM cartridge on the record?, well a total absence of noise/hum or the like that you have through your MC cartridges ( and that is not a cartridge problem but a Phonolinepreamp problem due to the low output of the MC cartridges. ), a dead silent black ( beautiful ) soundstage where appear the MUSIC performance, this experience alone is worth it.

The second and maybe the most important MM cartridge characteristic is that you hear/heard the MUSIC flow/run extremely “ easy “ with no distracting sound distortions/artifacts ( I can’t explain exactly this very important subject but it is wonderful ) even you can hear/heard “ sounds/notes “ that you never before heard it and you even don’t know exist on the recording: what a experience!!!!!!!!!!!

IMHO I think that the MUSIC run so easily through a MM cartridge due ( between other facts ) to its very high compliance characteristic on almost any MM cartridge.

This very high compliance permit ( between other things like be less sensitive to out-center hole records. ) to these cartridges stay always in contact with the groove and never loose that groove contact not even on the grooves that were recorded at very high velocity, something that a low/medium cartridge compliance can’t achieve, due to this low/medium compliance characteristic the MC cartridges loose ( time to time and depending of the recorded velocity ) groove contact ( minute extremely minute loose contact, but exist. ) and the quality sound performance suffer about and we can hear it, the same pass with the MC cartridges when are playing the inner grooves on a record instead the very high compliance MM cartridges because has better tracking drive perform better than the MC ones at inner record grooves and here too we can hear it.

Btw, some Agoners ask very worried ( on more than one Agon thread ) that its cartridge can’t track ( clean ) the cannons on the 1812 Telarc recording and usually the answers that different people posted were something like this: “””” don’t worry about other than that Telarc recording no other commercial recording comes recorded at that so high velocity, if you don’t have trouble with other of your LP’s then stay calm. “””””

Well, this standard answer have some “ sense “ but the people ( like me ) that already has/have the experience to hear/heard a MM or MC ( like the Ortofon MC 2000 or the Denon DS1, high compliance Mc cartridges. ) cartridge that pass easily the 1812 Telarc test can tell us that those cartridges make a huge difference in the quality sound reproduction of any “ normal “ recording, so it is more important that what we think to have a better cartridge tracking groove drive!!!!

There are many facts around the MM cartridge subject but till we try it in the right set-up it will be ( for some people ) difficult to understand “ those beauties “. Something that I admire on the MM cartridges is how ( almost all of them ) they handle the frequency extremes: the low bass with the right pitch/heft/tight/vivid with no colorations of the kind “ organic !!” that many non know-how people speak about, the highs neutral/open/transparent/airy believable like the live music, these frequency extremes handle make that the MUSIC flow in our minds to wake up our feelings/emotions that at “ the end of the day “ is all what a music lover is looking for.
These not means that these cartridges don’t shine on the midrange because they do too and they have very good soundstage but here is more system/room dependent.

Well we have a very good alternative on the ( very low price ) MM type cartridges to achieve that music target and I’m not saying that you change your MC cartridge for a MM one: NO, what I’m trying to tell you is that it is worth to have ( as many you can buy/find ) the MM type cartridges along your MC ones

I want to tell you that I can live happy with any of those MM cartridges and I’m not saying with this that all of them perform at the same quality level NO!! what I’m saying is that all of them are very good performers, all of them approach you nearest to the music.

If you ask me which one is the best I can tell you that this will be a very hard “ call “ an almost impossible to decide, I think that I can make a difference between the very good ones and the stellar ones where IMHO the next cartridges belongs to this group:

Audio Technica ATML 170 and 180 OCC, Grado The Amber Tribute, Grace Ruby, Garrot P77, Nagaoka MP-50 Super, B&O MMC2 and MMC20CL, AKG P8ES SuperNova, Reson Reca ,Astatic MF-100 and Stanton LZS 981.

There are other ones that are really near this group: ADC Astrion, Supex MF-100 MK2, Micro Acoustics MA630/830, Empire 750 LTD and 600LAC, Sonus Dimension 5, Astatic MF-200 and 300 and the Acutex 320III.

The other ones are very good too but less refined ones.
I try too ( owned or borrowed for a friend ) the Shure IV and VMR, Music maker 2-3 and Clearaudio Virtuoso/Maestro, from these I could recommended only the Clearaudios the Shure’s and Music Maker are almost mediocre ones performers.
I forgot I try to the B&O Soundsmith versions, well this cartridges are good but are different from the original B&O ( that I prefer. ) due that the Sounsmith ones use ruby cantilevers instead the original B&O sapphire ones that for what I tested sounds more natural and less hi-fi like the ruby ones.

What I learn other that the importance on the quality sound reproduction through MM type cartridges?, well that unfortunately the advance in the design looking for a better quality cartridge performers advance almost nothing either on MM and MC cartridges.

Yes, today we have different/advanced body cartridge materials, different cantilever build materials, different stylus shape/profile, different, different,,,,different, but the quality sound reproduction is almost the same with cartridges build 30+ years ago and this is a fact. The same occur with TT’s and tonearms. Is sad to speak in this way but it is what we have today. Please, I’m not saying that some cartridges designs don’t grow up because they did it, example: Koetsu they today Koetsu’s are better performers that the old ones but against other cartridges the Koetsu ones don’t advance and many old and today cartridges MM/MC beat them easily.

Where I think the audio industry grow-up for the better are in electronic audio items ( like the Phonolinepreamps ), speakers and room treatment, but this is only my HO.

I know that there are many things that I forgot and many other things that we have to think about but what you can read here is IMHO a good point to start.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
rauliruegas

Showing 50 responses by rauliruegas

Dear Ecir38: Yes, IMHO the screw build material could makes a difference but you need a high resolution audio system to be aware of it.

Yes too, how tight are those screws holding the cartridge makes a difference for the worst, let me explain:

what do you want? hear what is on the recording or what is in the recording with added distortions?

we al know that even in the best/near perfect audio system on system playback the system itself add different kind of distortions/colorations/whatever you want to name it.

In the cartridge/headshell link happen that too: I always try ( with all the tonearms I own or owned but my own tonearm design. ) to have the cartridge/headshell screws as tight as it could trying with this that the " intimate " cartridge/headshell union can't add distortions/resonances because a loose screws.
When we set the screws at different tight levels the resonance cartridge/headshell frequency/tone changes. IMHO as thightest as more neutral, I don't like to compensate in this cartridge/headshell connection for system " failures/errors/distortions " elsewhere.

IMHO if any one of you like more what you are hearing through loosing screws I think that you are only compensating and adding distortions to other system distortions.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Jorsan: Yes, it is 5grs. Very good cartridge along its brother the 20E Super ( same weight. )

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Timeltel/Headsnappin/friends: Be carefully about which stylus replacement that Neddledpot carry are really original.

I know very well this stylus source and I don't posted on it because more than a " tool/help " could make a little " harm ", let me explain it:

I came there for the first time because Siniy123 wanted to buy an ATN 170ML OCC and he email me asking for my opinion and after that he decided to buy it and that time the stylus replacement was a real Original one.

Then I wanted ( latter on. ) to buy a replacement for my ADC TRX cartridge and through the picture in its site everything told me that the stylus was an original but I wanted to be sure so I asked to Neddledepot and after three different answers they can't tell me for sure if was original. Pass the time other person ask me about Neddle depot for other replacement and same history.

Now, if you see the picture on the AT 24/25 you can look that is the same one that for the Signet TK9La, this can't be because both stylus replacement for the Signet and the Audio Technica must be different.
Other problem is that in the Original AT 24/25 you can read in the aluminum stylus plate: 24, here at Neddledepot this does not exist.

Yes, I know that in their site we can read: org., but IMHO certainly are not Original: at least the 24 and the Signet.

Gentlemans, do you think that by " free " at random comes a stylus replacemnt source with Original models at half or third price lower that the other stylus replacement sources?, no way IMHO.

If I was any of you first ask about and second ask for a return warranty if happen is not original.

Anyway, your call I only say: be extremely carefully about.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Kravi4k: Both B&O cartridges are on the low cartridge line. The ones to looking for are the MMC1, MMC2 or MM20CL.

Those Technics I never heard it but wait for better Technics opportunities on other top models.

The Nagaoka 500 and the 50 are more alike than different on quality performance level and the MP-50 has lower price.

The Nagatron that I name it here in my last post is very good cartridge too.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Here the pictures:

http://www.needledepot.com/stereo_needle/SIGNET/TKN9LCAORIGINE/6662.51.html

http://www.needledepot.com/stereo_needle/AUDIOTECHNICA/ATN2425ORI/5188.8.html

Raul.
Dear friends: I own both Original cartridges AT24/Signet TK10MLII/III.

The Signet Original stylus comes with two screws ( different size. ) on the aluminum plate and the 24/25 only one and the second forward hole for the tiny screw ( that comes in the Signet. ) does not exist in the 24 only the hole cover up with some kind of black material.

Raul.
Dear friends: Here the original Empire 4000D3:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Empire-4000D-lll-Cartridge-/130518627098?pt=Turntable_Parts_Accessories&hash=item1e6384331a#ht_544wt_1139

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Travbrow: Yes, the AT came marked Audio technica and is in the stylus aluminum plate where the 24 is marked. Both the 24/25 are exactly the same elipthical stylus. I owned the 25 but I can't remember if was graved the 25 on the stylus plate.
Btw, Timeltel and Downunder: your AT 24/25 stylus came with the 24 or 25 engraved?, thank you.

The Signet MLII and MLIII stylus came in aluminum color ( plate ) and the difference is a refinement on the MLIII over the MLII line contact stylus shape.

Yes, IMHO unfortunatelly that 23 is not the MLIII but the ATN23 for the AT23.

Not all stylus owners are really honest or knows the importance that has for each one of us the word: Original.
As I posted we have to be extremely carefully not only with Needle Depot but with any other stylus replacement source. Blue Broz/Adelcom is not a trusty one I posted in this thread about.

My advise for any one of us is that if we have any " tiny " doubt it will be a " healthy " way to ask in this thread before buy it, here are people that could help and give their advice on that regard.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Timeltel: I'm a customer ( three different times. ) from that Netherlands stylus source, last one for an Excel stylus that I'm waiting for its arrival.

I aked them for the AT 24 subject and today told me that there is an engraved 24 number.
Audio Technica IMHO an experiences with is a " consistent " builder, at least with its top of the line cartridges, so I don't think that the no-engraved 24 number is a different batch of the same Original stylus. Could be?, well I think only Audio Technica could give us a precise answer.

Anyway, in my case I think I have the " real Original stylus in both: the AT and the Signet TK10.

Btw, I know that you and other persons have a lot of fun with the " hybrids ". Through some experiences I don't do it any more, I buy an hybrid stylus replacement only by necessity: this is that the " compatible " stylus I buy it only to have a stylus set for VDH can retip and " refresh " the whole cartridge.

Some cartridge models from the same build could looks similar external but its electrical parameters not always are exactly the same. For example the ATML170 OCC is identical ( body cartridge ) to the AT ML180 OCC and both ( that I own. ) accept either cartridge stylus model but its inductance and internal resistance is different so its quality performance is different too.
In the other side cartridges like the Ortofon M20 Super are truly interchangable between the E and the FL model because are identical on electrical parameters and only differ on stylus shape.
My experiences on hybrids were that always sounds better the VDH work than the hybrid one. I know that VDH him self knows almost all the parameters and what the original cartridge design was intented and he refresh/retip nearest to those design and intented performance.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Timeltel: I'm not really questioning you or other people I just said what I made on the subject. Than's for your reply.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Timeltel: There were at least 9 different F-14 cartridge models as 9 models on the Level II Grace line.

I never seen either on the net for sale.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Siniy123: Thank you for the links, are self explicatory.

This confirm, at least, that in the AT23 and 24 the model number comes engraved.

Regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear Downunder: The 23 and the 24. The 24 comes in my cartridge and in the samples that the Netherlands source has for sale. The number comes in the stylus plate.

Btw, like in yours in my cartridge sample the tiny " hole " comes in black.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm: Good to know you comeback! and can enjoy music listening in your audio system again.

Yes, we all can't be wrong about the Azden: very good indeed and a Colibri favorable comparison say a lot of the Azden performance.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm: Well, LPGear has the original top of the line AT Precept that is the same on TN but higher price:

http://www.lpgear.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=LG&Product_Code=PCN550ML

That one was the one Precept cartridge I owned but I sold it maybe because did not give me " emotions ". Frankly I can't remember, I owned a lot of MM cartridges and after so many years is not easy to remember its precise quality performance.

As you said we need to be a Sherlock Holmes and have a lot of time to find out the " real " facts.

AT, Empire, Azden and many other not only made his own different cartridges with different market models and even to a specific audio dealers but were builders fror other companies ( OEM. ).

Maybe four years ago I could buy a Precept cartridge but not now till one of you comes here and say: " phenomenal ".
I have at least 30 different cartridges that I don't test and that are in the " closset ".

Anyway, always this kind of " discoveries " give us good information.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Dgob: Yesterday I was lucky enough to win an ebay auction for a Micro Seiki LF-7 ( variable flux. Non integrated headshell but standard 1/2" mount. ) that I assume is no other than the Glanz ( moving flux. ) MFG-71E.
Every single MS specs coincide/similar that the ones in the Glanz.

I know I can't absolutely sure is the same Glanz cartridge but my " feeling " is that it is and certainly when I test it ( I will report on that. ) we can be sure because if it is what I'm assuming then its quality performance must be first rate as your Glanz or the Astatic MF-100.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear friends: Very interesting all these last 10-12 post and in especial the JCarr contributions.

I think I'm just finishing with the FR thread discussion that right now is taking my main time but as soon is done I come back here to comment on those different topics. Yes, I'm learning through that FR tonearm thread that start Downunder.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
dear Jcarr: Thank's to join us this time.

It is " curious " ( and not rare. ) that a person like Jcarr likes more a cartridge in a manufacturer line that is not the top of the line as is the Fr-6E against the " lower " model as the Fr-5E.

So after the Jcarr post then the 5E could be worth to hear it. Maybe Halcro that has the contact seller could buy it and report in consequence.

regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear halcro: +++++ " Wdi,
I started off with my Empire 4000D/III mounted in the low-mass unipivot Grace 940G which I imagine is quite close to your Morch DP-6?
Surprisingly I found the 4000D/III a better match to the high-mass Fidelity Research FR-64s as was also the case with my Empire 1000ZE/X (go figure?)
This was further demonstrated when I mounted the 4000D/III in the FR-66s tonearm where it produced it's best qualities.
Simply wonderful cartridges those two Empires. " +++++

yes both Empire's are really good. My experiences with those Empires are very similar regarding tonearms, in the G-940 performs good but not at the same level than in the AT 1503-III. It is not only that the AT or the FR are high mass against the G-940 this one too has different bearing as is an unipivot design.

I have better Empires experiences on the G-940 using high weight headshells ( 15 grs. ), you could try and see what happen in your gear.

Wdi, I don't know all the tonearms you own, there are no rules here so we have to try what we have on hand and listening and decide if the quality performance is a good one or not.

Now, the Empire 4000DIII was designed to " see " 100K on load impedance and this makes a difference as the capacitance value makes too a difference.
So we have to take care in these two cartridge electrical set up parameters as in VTA/SRA right set up.

My best advice is try different capacitance values hear it and decide. An additional advise with MM/MI cartridges is to set up first the VTA/SRA and in a second time/step " tame " the sound with loadded capacitance, of course you can do the other way around but what was my advise is what works for me and I hope works for any one too.

regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear Downunder: +++++ " I think the success of these seeming anomalies of tonearm/cartridge matching simply show us that the data (for compliance and tonearm effective mass) we are given to plug into the equation are crap. Garbage in; garbage out.

Or we just like that particular sound and how it gels in our system, rightly or wrongly. " +++++

yes I agree but this subject can't alone ( I posted several times. ) tell us almost nothing on the cartridge/tonearm quality performance ( it does not matters MC or MM/MI. ), there are several different factors that along the cartridge/tonearm resonance frequency define the quality performance level: one of these factors is accurate set up.

I think that this accuracy on cartridge/tonearm set up is a main factor over the other ones to achieve top quality performance level.
Of course that could be some cartridge/tonearm combination where the resonance frequency factor could be the main one but it is not often to find this case.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear dertonarm: Even in the FR or Ikeda tonearm the 702 Fr-7f and the Ikeda9 ( I prefer the Micro Seiki MAX for these cartridges. ) can't match what Halcro pointed out on the MM/MI cartridges.

In my experiences the nearest ( to Halcro subject. ) LOMC are: Olympos, Allaerts Formula one and Goldbug Ms. Brier ( not Mr. brier. ).
Other people experiences could name different cartridges and are valid only if they heard bis a bis in the same system ( same time ) the MM/MI alternative. I did it as Halcro.

Regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear Dlaloum: This could be a good Azden source stylus replacement, you only have to ask if it is and after market replacement or an original one:

http://www.pickupnaald.nl/?page=shop/flypage&product_id=586

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Frogman: I can understand that you are not fully yet " convince " on the MM/MI alternative superiority against the MC alternative.

Once I was convinced on the superiority of the MC alternative ( mainly because the AHE give no other choice. ) and I spend around 100K big dollars in that alternative not only that I designed ( along Jose. ) a phonolinepreamp mainly dedicated to the MC alternative ( but with MM stage too. ) till I find out the MM/MI alternative and till not only understand the MM/MI needs but its very high quality performance level when you match those MM/MI needs, just in the same manner you have to meet the LOMC cartridge needs.
This take me years to learn ( I'm still learning. ) testing, researching, listening and again and again the full circle till I saw the " light ".

You posted that the ML170 is almost " boring " and I respect your opinion but I can tell you that if you give all the ML170 needs then you will see the real and true everything but boring quality performance high quality performance that the ML170 can show you, the same for the Empire.

Your ET2 is a good tonearm but preclude you can use different headshells with different build materials, different weight and even different shapes, you need too the opportunity to choose impedance up to 100K and of course flexibility on capacitance values.

All these factors and other ones are important for a MM/MI cartridge can show you its best, obviously that the phono stage quality performance is way important too but first fulfill the cartridge needs and of course an accurate cartridge set up.

I can asure you that the rewards about are just amazing/outstanding and worth the whole effort.

regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear Dertonarm: The Atmasphere phonolinepreamps are fully tubes ones not hybrid.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear friends: The Empire 4000DIII set up as in any other cartridges is system dependent on tonearm, phono stage and impedance/capacitance values.

The " thing " is that what you have work for your music sound priorities.

Btw, Frogman what you posted on high frequencies ATML170 OCC performance seems to me that other than VTA/SRA/azymuth " confirmation " you can " open " that frequency range through different capacitance value. You could try and see what happen because as Dgob point out this AT cartridge is really good.

Regards and enjoy the musuic,
Raul.
Dear Kcc123: Yes, the straing gauge alternative is that another alternative.

I heard many years ago the Sao Win and the Panasonic but due to those many years I heard I really don't have a precise opinion on these two cartridges.

In the other side I have a good memory of the SoundSmith cartridge and my opinion about it is already in a very " hot " thread elsewhere in this forum but my take in this SS is that I don't like it because has a " wrong " design.

The strain gauge alternative if is good designed and excuted is very promising an a good alternative.

Frequently you can find on ebay the Panasonic one but not always with its " converter "/electronics need it.

Probably some other people here could share their " fresh " experiences on the subject.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Listener614: I almost can add nothing of what other posted/answer to your post:

+++++ " MC track better, have better definition (full range), and are quieter.... " +++++

I own over 70 MM/MI cartridges and several very good LOMC cartridges in non but the Denon S1 and Ortofon MC2000 any MC cartridge can not say " beat " the tracking " skills " of the MM/MI cartridges I own.
The Denon and Ortofon I name it are very good trackers for a MC cartridge but even that only can even the MM/MI alternatiove in this regard and several MM/MI ones beats the Denon/Ortofon models I name it.
Of course that it is not only important the cartridge own " skills " on the tracking subject the matching tonearm and cartridge set up is very important too.

The other subject that worried me is that you said the LOMC are quieter than MM/MI, could be with some cartridge but in general my experiences were the other way around.

I know that you are reporting what you heard in your system and I can say that I lived that kind of experiences in those " old times " with my system integrated for " old times " audio items.
Yes, I remember that when I heard my firsts LOMC cartridges I just left the MM/MI cartridges in the closet.

Today our MM/MI alternative experiences are way different.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear T_bone: Only to clarify. I used SUTs for many years today I don't any more.

I think that if in any " dcent " audio system you can give what in specific are the needs/what a MM/MI are asking then it is IMHO a very very hard call to anyone to prefer the LOMC alternative.

We have to take in count here that in the last years the phono stage best designs were almost 100% LOMC dedicated almost no one goes in deep in a dedicated top MM/MI phono stage.
This link makes a difference and even against this " heavy " handicap the MM/MI shows that is really a good very good alternative and beyond any one expectative.

A fair comparison can only made when in the same system we can fulfill both alternative needs and this means on phono stage too.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Downunder/Lewm: Yes, I read several times your posts in reference that MM goes better with SS and MC with tubes.

When I read it I was tempted to give you my opninion about but I did not because there are some " sensible " facts about my opinion but due nto your " insistence " here it is:

IMHO there are at least three-four main factors to take in count to build an audio system with an excellence quality poerformance target:

accuracy, the lowest distortions, electrical matching and precise overall set up, well the five factor: our ears and knowledge on music.

A today good designed and executed SS Phonolinepreamp and amplifier are inherent: accurate, with the lowest overall distortions we can achieve and with almost no single problem to match electricaly ( impedances. ) with other system components like speakers.

If you have the other two factors: precise overall system set up and good ears and music knowledge then IMHO you can't beat that system.

In that kind of system LOMC cartridges or MM/MI cartridges or CDs or whatever you use as a source the system will " tell " you what is happening what is the real quality performance of any source.
So SS give us and function like a true " tool " to discern in true about any source alternative. It is not the source what tell us what we like but the whole system where the SS technology is responsible.

For years I heard through tubes, hybrid and SS alternatives and for many many years I heard/own and owned the best out there LOMC cartridge ( I spended more than 100k dollars only in the MC alternative. ) and I like it " even " that I was and am using SS electronics ( just like Halcro. ).

Yes, IMHO my system target is on the precise " road " to achieve ( sometime and this is my hopping. ) EXCELENCE level and this is what permit me discern about the real quality performance in the MM/MI alternative and not because SS electronics.

I don't want to open a useless window but all what I posted here you and anyone I know can achieve and be truer and real using tubes technology.
Anyone of you can or could argue about but fortunatelly facts are facts and tube technology is full of distortions, unaccurate and can't match electrical impedance with other audio system items: especially speakers.

I'm not talking what you like but what IMHO HAPPEN.

Any good audio system must have the " skills " to show the true quality performance level of any source. Of course this is an ideal target that IMHO we have to look for.

Good hunting!

Regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear T_bone/Halcro: It is curios because last week my friend Fernando was hearing my system and for the first time he was hearing a MM cartridge ( at least in my system ) and his very first comment was exactly the same:

" hey it hears like an MC one ".

and this first time listener behavior is normal because the only reference he had is the MC alternative, he in a first take can't discern on other MM/MI specific quality performance " factors ".

The fact that all these guys said it that the MM/MI is at least or sounds at least like a good MC is really nice because all these people when they give them the opportunity to knows in deep the MM/MI alternative then they will be aware in a more precise way the greatness of this alternative.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear pryso: You can read it here:

http://www.vinylengine.com/cartridge_database.php?m=Empire&t=mm&mod=&sort=1&Search=Search&sty=&ovlo=&ovhi=&can=&dclo=&dchi=&stid=&masslo=&masshi=¬es=&prlo=&prhi=

and I can read it too in my Empire operation manual. Now my 4000DIII is the original one not the Gold that could be a little different and I say " could be " because I can't be sure till I have on hand the Gold one.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Dertonarm: There are at least three other persons in this forum that perhaps are not so " technical-wise " like you that in other threads and over the time already give an explanation why they prefer active high gain phono stages against SUTs: Jcarr, Atmasphere and Dougdeacon. There are several other with a high gain active phono stage preferences including me.

Take a look on those threads ( as numerous almost as the Fr ones. ) and see different opinions that your " technical-wise " one.

Yes, back to the MM subject.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm: I'm not saying that +++ " and from that you infer that those of us who use tubes primarily are somehow lacking in experience or judgement... " +++++

please read again my post where you can read that my main audio target is to achieve Excellence level and IMHO ( due to what I posted there. ) tube technology can't fulfill that quality performance level.
IMHO SS in the way to go if we want to achieve that target. Lewm this is only an opinion.

The other subject is that maybe you are not heard yet SS electronics that fulfill that target.

Anyway, I said it that I don't want to touch the tube subject because is a very sensible subject. Now if you come back and tell me that tube electronics fulfill all the characteristics I neme it then maybe is time that I cange ( again ) my way of thinking about.

Lewm, remember that I have experiences with tube electronics too and I think that tubes has a lot more " color " ( read: distortions. ) that the right one that Halcro/Frogman are talking on the experience of listening music.

In the other side I'm not talking of what we like only but what we like and is right.

This subject always is " heavy " controversial and maybe we can't really achieve conclussions that fulfill any one priorities and targets. My post was more to point out that that SS/MM and tube/MC relationsship that Downunder and others talk is not necessary true but more because each electronic technology advantages, disadvantages, limitations and design but not because the cartridges it self.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Pryso: I understand you. Normally all the cartridges of those old times that were designed for 4-channels reproduction ( like the Empire 4000III ) were designed with 100K on load impedance due the needs of that recording technology that goes beyond 50khz on frequency range.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Frogman: +++++ " The term "color" is too often considered a negative, eventhough music is full of timbral color. " +++++

yes indeed but IMHO that is because no one talks on the true and real " color " that music has, if there is a right " color " that's in live music that with out that full color just the soul/feelings/emotions that music can transmit disappear.

So we have to make a distinction between music real color and audio system " color " that are mere distortion levels. problem is that many people attend so little to live events and 99% of their listening is trhough home audio systems and their references are a little different that what live music can shows us.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm: As I said it: a very " sensible " subject. I can argue with facts about but only till you hear a good SS audio system set up you could understand what I mean other than specs figures and the like. Lewm, I think that music lovers are not prepare and with the mature need it to discuss with out biasing on the tuve/SS whole subject, that time sooner or latter will comes.

Never mind, we all are ready waiting for your reports on all those cartridges that you have and because the failure in your system you did not.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Frogman: Yes I agree. If you read about my priorities along tonal balance is at the top and yes that's the timbre " color ", with out it the sound could be " all wrong ".

Regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear Agon's friends/community:

MY BEST WISHES ON THIS CHRISTMAS DATE AND THAT 2011 BE A NEW YEAR FULL OF HEALTH AND HAPINESS FOR ALL OF YOU AND YOUR DEAREST FAMILY!!!!!!!!!!!

Sincerely,

Raul.
Dear Lewm: I support the Azden like any other top MM/MI cartridge. I agree with Acman3, it needs at least 20 hours and after that play a little not only with VTA/SRA but with capacitance loading where you must try different values. You can try too a different headshell and if all that does not works then a different tonearm.

I like the Colibri but even its very high quality performance my Azden is a little better and I say my Azden because we all know the Azden failure from new with the Halcro's one.

The other subject is that the systems where we are hearing the Azden are differents but even that there is a common opinion: very good performer, yes better than the Urushi that IMHO it's outperformed by the Colibri.

As always just my opinion, the good one is yours.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Dlaloum: Yes, hearing Shure's/Stanton's/Pikering's with out damping brush makes IMHO/experiences a difference for the better.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Stiltskin: This is the best time for you move here to our loved México: Puerto Vallarta, Huatulco Harbors, Can Cún, Los Cabos, Oaxaca and the like, of course with outthat " artic wind from Canada ".

Have a good time, as this time your forum contributions always appreciated.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm: Yes that is the LPM series cartridge.

I don't heard yet my LPM315 VDH refreshed stylus replacement against the original but the original is a winner, I ranked it at the same Technics 100CMK4 level. I can't be sure but for what are my experiences the VDH refreshed one could be an improvement an important one not only because the re-tip but because this one has a " new " cartridge suspension and this factor is critical for any cartridge can shows at its best, we will see.

As I posted I need to hear it again especially because from 4-5 months ago I'm putting more care on cartridge loading capacitance that IMHO with several/some cartridges makes a difference and this difference goes from a " ok " quality performance level to a " great " one with the same cartridge where only was made a capacitance change value.

When I made the LPM315 review I don't changed the capacitance values and I have to try this again and not only with the Acutex but with all my cartridges.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Downunder: All these vintage cartridges were designed and voiced with vintage electronics ( audio systems. ) where our each one audio system today is far from be a " vintage " one.
This fact makes a difference in the way we made a vintage cartridge electrical setting, not only that I can asure you that in those old times the VTA/SRA cartridge setting was different from what we make today.

In the terms of Dlaloum all you know ( as you stated. ) I'm a " reproducer ": faithful to the recording. Yes this means at least two factors: accuracy and lower distortions.

Admit that I'm not sure if in one each of my ( 80+ )vintage cartridges I have " flat response " it is only that: that I'm not sure but this does not change in anyway my main audio target: faithful to the recording.

That means that I'm not absolutely sure because I did not any measure on my cartridges specs against its playback performance. This is something that certainly I will make someday, sooner or latter.

Always that I can I try to make measures in audio or at least to be sure about accuracy and distortions figures level on audio items. Things are that with so many vintage cartridges to test I don't have time yet to make those measurements and compare against what my " ears " are telling me.

+++++ " while condemming anyone with tubes or not using subwoofers that relieve your full range speakers of playing full range. " +++++

I'm not condemming nothing about tubes ( and remember that I was an user of tubes for years. ), are the facts ( scientific and some not so scientifics. ) the ones that condemm that technology.
I learned on the tube whole subject and due to my main target in audio: faithful to the recording, tubes are out of that " equation ".
I think that we need to have and to know more in deep about tube technology limitations. My advise is that with out any kind of " bias " you study or try to understand the Ohm's Law about electrical impedance matching between audio items and its critical importance.

I'm sure that when you understand why any today or vintage tube amplifier can't match any today or vintage speakers in detriment of music/sound quality performance you could understand what I'm saying about and what you are really hearing right now in your system ( I'm not talking if you like what you are hearing or not, I'm talking on: faithful to the recording target. ).
As I posted before I don't want to open a " tube window " here not only because is a very " sensible " subject but because before we could " talk " about we need not experience on tube audio system playback ( like you have. ) but how tube technology works, where is good for audio and where goes against audio.

About subwoofers I already posted enough on that subject in that subwoofer dedicated thread where you not only can read my opinion but other people opinions.
Yes I'm still supporting that we need ( at least ) two self powered subwoofers connected in true stereo fashion for a two channel audio system ( passive speakers. ) dedicated to hear/heard music.
Till today I can't understand how any one can/could achieve stellar quality performance level in a passive speakers audio system with the integration of one subwoofer ( as a bass reinforcement.where the main passive speakers are running full.
IMHO there is no way that we can achieve top quality performance with that one subwoofer in the system against what I proposed and still propose on the whole subwoofer subject.

Now and returning to the MM/MI electrical setting, Dlaloum pointed out and pointed well:

+++++ " Playing "by ear" requires a huge level of experience with varied equipment, music types, rooms and acoustics.... " +++++

Someway or the other we all " run " mainly our system by " ear ", many of us runed by measurements and some of us runned by measurements and ear.

I'm in this last area and today I can tell that I made it with success.

That " huge level of experiences.... " is something where I'm dedicated and where I have a follow a dicipline process for many many years to achieve that level Dlaloum is talking about. Some people ( out of México. ) in USA that knows me because I was at their places can give a testimony of what I'm point out here on the subject.

I posted several time over the forum how I acquired that experience level that permit me to be aware on many things that other people can't, not because I'm better or have better " ears " but because I'm trained in adifferent way than other people: I had and have an in porpose training.

I said I'm not sure in absolute way about flat frequency response with my vintage cartridges setting but I'm sure that I'm close it that you can imagine.

I want to repeat ( I hope by last time. ) one of my experiences that was shared by other audiophiles in San Diego in one of my visits to USA.

we was comparing the Dartzeel Phonolinepreamp ( in two different audio systems, in two different rooms. ) against other Phonolinepreamp.
This was way before appeared the Stereophile Dartzeel review. In that time I told my audio friends that even that the Dartzeel " sounds " good ( everybody like it, including me. ) it was faulty ( maybe on porpose. ) at both frequency extremes and I told them why I thinked in that way.
Months latter comes the STR review where we can read the Dartzeel measurements that confirmed what I told my friends.

This was and is not an easy task and you can only have this " true " discern level if you are trained in specific.

Yes, I trust in my ears but in a different way/level that other people did/do it. Could I be wrong?, it could but who knows.

In the other side you have to remember that there is nothing perfect in audio and that we ( one way or the other and because the enviroment we are surrounded or because " needs ". ) must accept trade-offs like it or not. These trade offs choose are the ones IMHO that define in absolute terms our each one audio system uality performance level.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Dlaloum and friends: In VE we can find out this impedance/capacitance/inductance MM/MI cartridge set up in two-three separate threads. I participated in one of them, the " results " were coming from that hagerman calculator and a VE other calculator.

My take there and here is that we can have some " signs " through those calculators but not a real and true fact on that critical cartridge electrical set up.

There are many factors that affect those measurements: accurate tonearm set up, accurate cartridge set up, which tonearm and/or headshell we choosed I mean characteristics, which tonearm internal wire we are using,tonearm phono IC, which geometry approach tonearm/cartridge set up we choosed ( Löfgren, Stevencon, etc, etc . ), which signal test LPs we choosed, which phono stage and its quality performance and accuracy level, which, which..., and which....

I take it all the charts/diagrams that shows frequency response in some of my cartridges and I found out these information:

- all the top of the line cartridges shows through the FR charts a deviation from 20hz to 20khz at +,- 1db.

- - measurements were taked with an ambiente temperature around: 20° to 23°.

- the test signal recordings they used were JVC TRS 1007 and 1005 along CBS 151 and 130 and with the Technics the SFC TR100 test LP that I assume comes from Technics ( btw, I own all those test recordings but the Technics ). Something weird/curios is that Ortofon and Shure that had/has its own signal test recordings don't use it but the JV or CBS ones.

- no one but Technics and Denon ( DL103D ) pointed out the load impedance and capacitance that were used on that FR measurements.

- normally on those vintage cartridges even if I had the cartridge manual I can't find/read the true and real cartridge inductance value even not the internal DC resistance or impedance.
There are cartridges like the Micro Seiki that not only does not have information on these electrical parameters but even you can't read in the manual specs nothing about load impedance and capacitance set up manufacturer advise.

Now, in all thise FR charts we can see an almost flat line response with lower deviation that that +,- 1 db. My question is: how these guys achieve those results? I mean which analog rig they used and if all of them used the Stevenson tonearm/cartridge approach that was the " normal " one in those times by Japanese " people ".

IMHO to achieve that " nice " FR charts everything must be near perfect!!! and we don't know ( at least me. ) all the factors that surrounded that " near perfect " set up.

This open for me another question: is it in reality that that +,- 1 db FR cartridge deviation comes 100% from the cartridge performance it self? or in reality the cartridge FR has no measurable deviation ( by it self ) and that deviation comes from ( adding. ) each analog audio link used to made that FR cartridge response measurements.

Who or whom has the precise and true answers?.

All these factors and many more makes things complicate and a hard task and time consuming to achieve the right information and the right answers on the whole subject.

Yes, I think that today we have to trust in our skills to have accuracy ( top level: 100%. ) on cartridge/tonearm set up, to trust in the accurate system electronics specs and performance level, to trust in our whole experience in music and audio and to trust in our skills to discern what is right or wrong and what is " wrong but I like it ".

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
I'm not sure if in the last link the price is only for stylus repair/fix or for the AKG cartridge with a fixed and new stylus made by them.

Sorry but no english in that site. Anyway IMHO is a good news for that persons interested on AKG cartridges (??) or a source for fix their AKG ones.

Raul.
Dear In_shore: I don't think that could happen because almost all the top of the line AT models already " raved/rated " alond the thread by different persons.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm: +++++ " It is quite likely that sonic happiness is something different for each of us. So, it is difficult to know how to evaluate each others' opinions of MM/MI cartridges. " +++++

IMHO not quite. It is obvious that we all have differences in the quality system performance due to many factors: room treatment/no-room treatment, tubes/SS/hybrid electronics, speakers, music sound knowledge and discern level and of course each one priorities.

Even all those factors I think that what each one of us have and are hearing at home is ( according all those factors and factors?s limitations. ) a music/sound that sounds like music and that appeal not only us but to other people that comes and hear each one audio system. I think that we have more even " sound " than bigger differences and that's why everyone that own the 4000DIII or the P100CMK4 agree ( even with those differences in audio systems. ) on its high quality cartridge performance.
If those system differences were " bigger " then some of us maybe already reported a lower cartridge quality performance.

So, each one of our audio systems has limitations but IMHO inside/between those system limitations its quality performance is the " best " we can achieve, I hope.

Facts through this thread tell us that a good quality performance cartridge ( that the ones I named or other ones out there. ) will has that quality performance level regarding the audio system and always that the cartridge/tonearm was with the right set-up.

Yes, we have differences " level's differences " but what is good everyone can tell it and what is wrong everyone can tell it too.

I trust in all and each one of your opinions in the MM/MI quality performance level and always take it seriously.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm, Timeltel, Halcro and friends: For many years trough the forum I posted several times that we have to understand what that tonearm/cartridge res0nace frequency " figure " means but not be so " anal " to take it as a must to have if we want good cartridge quality peformance level, even when people ask I told them please try it and forget for a moment on that resonance frequency subject. I'm not saying it is not important because it is: more on this latter.

You can read through my official forum reviews that for example the Technics P100CMK4 that is a high compliance one I mated with my AT 1503 tonearm along an aluminum 15grs headshell that made for a total of 35grs ( with out cartriudge weight. ) of tonearm effective mass, not the best match on that resonance frequency figure. Even that performs just great.

Both, Acutex LPM 315 and Empire 4000DIII, were reviewed on the Grace G945 that is a medium mass tonearm but with the Acutex I used a 12grs headshell. Both performs great too.

After the Empire official review I mounted in the AT 1503 and Lustre GST-801 both more in the high mass side than medium one where I used with an aluminum 18grs headshell and you know what: performs just lovely and maybe better, in either tonearm, than in the Grace. So does not surprise me what Halcro report on that cartridge through a high mass tonearm. Anyone that followed this thread knows that I tested several high compliance MM/MI cartridge in the high mass AT tonearm with very good results.

I posted several times too all the factors/parameters that has influence in a tonearm/cartridge quality performance level other than that resonance frequency figure, are so many that this is the main reason why we can't take only the resonance frequency tonearm/cartridge figure like the parameter to match a cartridge with a tonearm.

Now, every thing the same a cartridge will perform better if that resonance frequency is nearest 10hz. I already tested using the same build material/shape headshell but with different weights, this I did it using AT aluminum Technicard 13grs, 15grs and 18grs headshell models.

There are many things that " escape " to our today knowle3dge on the subject and where " theory " seems not works in precise way and with absolute certainty.

On the Signet TK10ML2/3 my experiences in other tonearm than our own design told me that the cartridge is not only sensitive to VTA/SRA as any ML stylus shape but sensitive to the headshell build/weight material. I tested in different tonearms using the AT MG10 headshell ( magnesium/10grs. ) and in no tonearm like it, then I change it to an aluminum and heavier cartridge and the " light " really shine. This same experience was repeated with the AT ATML170/180 OCC cartridges.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.

I have a take on this cartridge performance subject: when we are talking on top of the line cartridges and we don't have top or nearest top quality performance then we have to try with other tonearm, other headshells, other internal tonearm wire, other tonearm IC cable, re-set cartridge/tonearm set up ( impedance/capacitance too. ) or even try with an un-orthodox VTA/SRA/VTF and if nothing works then maybe there is a cartridge failure that preclude to hear what that cartridge could shows if was in good condition.
Dear Pryso: I will paste it to you. As Nandric posted: too much to read it again and again and again in this thread. Enough for " today ".

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.