2. amps-preamps
  3. 1225925047

Which would you pick between these 2 and why?

I'm looking for opinions between these 2 products and why you'd choose it. I've owned quite a few amps including some Bryston.
I realize all the other associated components contribute in a big way, but all things being equal...

My current choice would be:

a) Bryston 3B ST

OR

b) McCormack DNA-125

Looking for some opinions

I prefer lots of detail but at the same time not the grain

Thanks for your input
audioknob
missioncoonery
1,221 posts
 
Given the very short list..McCormack,its more musical
audioknob OP
7 posts
 
DNA 0.5. This amp is much more transparent than the 125, not that it is a bad amp, but with my setup the soundstage is much deeper and the detail is phenomenal.
The 125 has more mid range warmth and bass slam though.
I think the 125 would probably be a better choice with speakers that are on the brighter side. I tried it on some that were kind of bright and it sounded excellent with good weight and natural vocals and cymbal shimmer.
Both excellent amps for the money in my opinion
audioknob OP
7 posts
 
I blew it on my last reply. It should have said I bought a second McCormack, a ...read above
More to discover