@whitestix , an interesting post. The original LS50 has been one of the great success stories of the past decade.
It will also be interesting to see which well known brands do not make an eventual appearance here. [Unless I've missed it, Tekton and Ohm Walsh's seem to have escaped so far, as have designs which feature ribbon tweeters?].
Maybe that was the OPs intention to draw up a domestic shortlist? He's making a list, he's checking it twice.
Anyway I think it's fair to assume that most of us were prepared to experiment with placing and ancillaries before condemning any particular speaker and moving on.
Why wouldn't we, considering the usual financial hit that normally comes with that?
I've owned 3 different Tannoy models and all have been good at their price points, the MX3, the R3 and the Berkeley's.
The only one I would have trouble living with today would be the budget floorstanding MX3s with their obvious treble sting (comparitively speaking + they weren't a horror show - very few are).
In hindsight maybe it wasn't that their treble was especially more harsh than the other two. Maybe it was the fact that they were doing quite a lot less elsewhere that drew more attention to what the soft dome tweeter was doing.
Ideally we audiophiles want a speaker that does a lot of things really well as otherwise we're likely to become increasingly frustrated with what we perceive is not being done well.
This brings the danger of upgrading to something that does this one particular thing better - only for us to later realise it also does quite a few things worse!
I suspect more than a few of us have been on this particular roundabout to find we end up back close to where we began.
Especially if we were fortunate enough to begin our initial audio journey with a mid or high performance design.
It will also be interesting to see which well known brands do not make an eventual appearance here. [Unless I've missed it, Tekton and Ohm Walsh's seem to have escaped so far, as have designs which feature ribbon tweeters?].
Maybe that was the OPs intention to draw up a domestic shortlist? He's making a list, he's checking it twice.
Anyway I think it's fair to assume that most of us were prepared to experiment with placing and ancillaries before condemning any particular speaker and moving on.
Why wouldn't we, considering the usual financial hit that normally comes with that?
I've owned 3 different Tannoy models and all have been good at their price points, the MX3, the R3 and the Berkeley's.
The only one I would have trouble living with today would be the budget floorstanding MX3s with their obvious treble sting (comparitively speaking + they weren't a horror show - very few are).
In hindsight maybe it wasn't that their treble was especially more harsh than the other two. Maybe it was the fact that they were doing quite a lot less elsewhere that drew more attention to what the soft dome tweeter was doing.
Ideally we audiophiles want a speaker that does a lot of things really well as otherwise we're likely to become increasingly frustrated with what we perceive is not being done well.
This brings the danger of upgrading to something that does this one particular thing better - only for us to later realise it also does quite a few things worse!
I suspect more than a few of us have been on this particular roundabout to find we end up back close to where we began.
Especially if we were fortunate enough to begin our initial audio journey with a mid or high performance design.