I haven't heard the Wakonda, but I've had an LK1 for about 13 years, and I am still happy with it. I upgraded it in '91 with the outboard power supply (the Dirak), and it hasn't missed a beat. Same for my LK2, upgraded to 280. It's also been on for most of that time, and now plays about 20 hours a week in my multiroom rig. My point is just that these things are sooooo cheap that they are off the scale in value. This is not an easy choice. Upgraded amps are nice, but are they worth it in a tri-amped active system? I'm sure you would be happy with a Wakonda, which is a likely successor to the LK1 in my own system, when the time comes. But I'm not replacing my LK1 until it expires! In your place, I would likely go with the 140's and the best quality LK1/Dirak I could find. I might even go with the 85's and spend the savings on software. BTW, John Atkinson reviewed the LK1/LK280 in Stereophile in '89.
Which Linn pre-amp
How are you doing. This is my first post to this forum and I'm going to be upgrading my system here shortly, and I was looking for some opinions. I'm contemplating between the Linn Wakonda and the LK1. I have Linn Kaber II's, and will be adding three Linn LK85 amps to go active. I haven't been able to find much on the LK1 preamp in the way of the sound quality. I am only concerned about 2 channel audio so all the bells and whistles of some of the other pre's dont matter to me. And dont bother responding with other brand preamp suggestions because I'm making my system totally Linn.
thank you, Greg
thank you, Greg
- ...
- 6 posts total
- 6 posts total