Which Class D Amplifier? PS Audio, Ghent, Nord, Merrill or other???


I’m looking for a new amp & want Class D.

I’ve seen various brands mentioned, such as PS Audio, Ghent, Nord, Merrel to name a few, but I’ve not heard any of them.

Which company is producing the best sounding Class D?
Which models should I be looking to demo?


Thanks



singintheblues

Showing 18 responses by noble100

"Also, because an amp uses GaN doesn’t necessarily make it better."

Hello toetapaudio,

     I mostly agree with georgehifi on this one.  The critical factor is eliminating or significantly reducing dead time which reduces distortion.  

     The use of GaN FETs, rather than silicon MOSFETs, is one method of doing this that seems like the method most companies are utilizing.
     The only exception I'm aware of is Ralph at Atma-Sphere that is developing their own version of a high quality class D amp.  Ralph has announced that they developed their own circuitry that eliminates dead time whether utilizing MOSFETs or GaN FETs.  They have a patent application pending on this circuitry.
      However, I believe Ralph stated that using GaN FETs along with his new circuitry would likely just further enhance his amp's sq performance.

     Either way, dead time is going to be dead as disco. 

Tim
georgehifi,

     I disagree with you all the time and your posts are tedious sometimes.      Despite it all, I still love ya, mate.


Tim

    When he came into the store and out of the cold, did he take off his earmuffs?

Tim
georgehifi,
     
     Mate,  I can only infer you're projecting and embarrassed because you leave your earmuffs on indoors, too.
 Love,
  Tim
georgehifi,

     Sorry, I didn't take anything you stated as a payout.

Tim
georgehifi,

     But did you enjoy my cheeky monkey comment about the earmuffs, mate?

Love,
Sunshine
georgehifi,

       I thought you knew that I'm not, and have never been, a retailer.  I'm just a 60 yr old music, ht and audio/video equipment enthusiast in Indiana.
      I am a big fan of class D amps (I own ClassD Audio, Emerald Physics and D-Sonic amps) and distributed bass array systems (I own the Audio Kinesis Debra) but have no affiliations with any of these companies or any other companies.  Now, if you want to accuse me of being a fan boy of either, I definitely plead guilty.
     I understand it's bad form to post here without declaring you're a retailer, dealer, owner or associated with any of these.  I've never self promoted anything since I've never had anything to promote besides products or technologies I have personal experience with and consider of high quality.
     If you're going to accuse me or anyone else of self promoting, please don't do it on nothing more than a hunch and have the good sense and courage to present your allegations in a more direct and responsible manner.
 
Thank you,
Tim 
georgehifi,

Miriva?  I think you mean miveraaudio.  

See the forest through the trees? I think you mean See the forest for the trees
     Are you okay?  You seem to be mixing things up and I think you're mixing me up with miveraaudio.

     It seems like miveraaudio owns Mivera Audio.  I read some of his previous responding posts and I think he is or was an amp assembler (like Nord) that used the Ice 1200AS modules in his own cases.  Many of his previous posts were advocating class D and especially the Ice Edge 1200AS module.  He appeared to be doing some self promoting on some of his other posts and I think somehow you mixed him up with me.
     I have no idea who this individual is and I think you're associating him with me for some reason.
     I have no idea what you're talking about so l'm just going to drop it and forget about it.  I suggest you may want to do the same.

Get some rest,
Tim
georgehifi,

     Okay, now I understand your 'payout' comment .  

     By the way, I completely agree with you that there are an abundance of really good class D amps on the market right now.  As you've so wisely stated, "the new fast GaN FETs and Atmo-Sphere patent pending circuitry's ability to significantly reduce or eliminate dead-time and further reduce the existing extremely low distortion levels will likely only make the future prospects of class D amps even brighter and more exciting". 

 Very well said, mate!
       Tim
Hello dmc,

      I've been curious how a pair of .7 Magnepans would sound being driven with very good amplification. 
     Now that it's been confirmed as a good combo, I'm curious how it could be improved with 1 or 2 good subs.  
     Better yet, how would they perform in a room with a complete 4 sub DBA bass system like the Audio Kinesis Swarm or Debra?
     
     I would imagine that the state of the art bass provided by the AK Swarm ($2,800) combined with the excellent mid-range and treble performance provided by the Magnepan .7 panels ($1,300/pr) would be extremely hard to better, especially at anything close to $4,100.

     With sota bass throughout the entire room as a solid foundation, The relatively small and light .7 panels could then be optimally positioned in relation to the listening seat for best mid/treble frequency response and imaging.

     I'm fairly certain the Swarm bass system would integrate seamlessly with the .7 panels because it does so with my much larger (6' x2')Magnepan 2.7QR panels in my 23x 16 x8 ft room.


Tim
     
      
aolmrd1241,

     I and many other class D fans, as well as many professional audio reviewers,. consider the Merrill Audio Veritas monoblocks  one of the finest amps utilizing current class D technology.   
     The fact that you cannot detect any shortcomings in their excellent sonic performance is surprising to exactly nobody, perhaps not even to georgehifi.  I've been using a pair of D-Sonic M3-600-M monoblocks, that I and others would likely classify as good quality that are priced at about 20%of the Veritas, in my system for over 3 yrs now and even I have also completely failed to detect any sonic shortcomings that georgehifi has so vaguely described and insists exist.
     Georgehifi has been spewing class D disinformation for years now on multiple audio forums without any supporting research results, information or even anecdotal examples.
     It's highly suspected that he has very little to no experience listening to good class D  amps, since it's the only explanation for his obviously ignorant theories, statements and comments concerning class D.
     Fortunately, clueless anti-class D propaganda has zero affect on those of us who have experienced the truth.
     I agree that the newer and faster GaN transistors may allow class D  performance to get even better.  Interesting times for audio.
Enjoy,
 Tim

georgehifi,

     I was hoping the link you included in your post was finally some, ANY, information supporting your false claims about class D sonic shortcomings.  But no, you're just continuing your evasion and refusal to answer questions meant to clarify exactly what these dubious sonic shortcomings actually sound like.  
     It has become increasingly obvious that you have little to no experience listening to good quality class D amps and that the reason actual owners and users of good quality class D amps are unable to discern these supposed shortcomings is because they do not exist.  
     Please understand that without a shred of supporting evidence, your inability/refusal to answer ANY clarifying questions and the absolute inability of users to perceive even a hint of your imaginary shortcomings, your claims have lost all credibility just as you are losing yours.
    On the positive side, those GaN transistors seem interesting.

Later,
  Tim
 
ricevs,

     A few of us here on Audiogon, myself included, have crossed paths with georgehifi and some of his dubious statements/theories about the current state of good class D amps utilizing MOSFET transistors.
       I understand your frustration since I also understand, based on using multiple good class D amps in my system for several years,  that I completely fail to detect any of the sonic shortcomings that georgehifi claims exist on my amps due to traditional FET transistors, the switching frequency being too low and the filter used to remove this switching frequency being of poor quality.
     Now, I just picture him walking aimlessly around an Australian city in a bathrobe and slippers, having just walked out of some institution attempting to treat his rare condition, continuously mumbling to himself phrases such as " switching frequencies too low!" and "better output filters needed!".  Occasionally, he stumbles upon an internet cafe and places posts on Audiogon.
     As I see it, however, the truth is that these new fast GaN FETs do have the potential to even further advance class D performance.  Perhaps higher switching carrier frequencies will be beneficial, too.  I think it's important to keep an open mind.
     Overall, I'm suggesting it may be best to just cut georgehifi some slack.  While he may be clueless on how good current class D amps with traditional FETs have become,  he oddly seems to have some good ideas on how to potentially make them even better.
Love,
 Tim
pcc67,

     That Apollon as4800 looks very nice and should work exceptionally well for your surround channels, powerful, accurate, clean and clear performance.
     I noticed your next addition may be room treatment and two subs.   It looks like two SVS-SB3000 subs would cost about $2,000.   I believe SVS subs are very good subs at reasonable prices and I think they're a good choice.  
     However, I wanted to point out that at about a $2K budget you do have multiple options that will provide different quality levels of bass response in your room.  Here are 3 options in order of expected performance quality level for both a music and HT system:

1. Good- Two SVS SB-3000 subs for about $2,000 ($1,000 each).  Two properly positioned and configured subs in a given room typically provides bass response at a designated listening seat that's approximately twice the quality level of utilizing a single sub. Two subs provide increased bass output capacity and impact as well as increased bass dynamics due to the sharing of total bass requirements between two subs operating well within their limits and stress free with ample power reserves for sudden bass output dynamic demands.
     Psychoacoustic principles also begin to be applied beginning with the use of two subs in any given room that results in the bass being perceived as smoother, more detailed and better integrated with the main speakers.  
     To understand how this psycho acoustic process works, it's important to understand how bass soundwaves behave in a room with a single sub.  Soundwaves increase in length as the frequency decreases and deep bass tone soundwaves are very long.  A full cycle soundwave of a 20 Hz deep bass tone is 56' long, a 30 Hz is 36', a 40 Hz is 28' and a 50 Hz is 23'.  It's also important to know three facts:
1. Our brains can't even process the presence of a deep bass tone until the full cycle soundwave exists in the room and our ears have inputted this information into the brain. 
2. Our brains require the input of at least three full cycle bass soundwaves before we are able to recognize a change in pitch.
3.  Our brains cannot localize deep bass tones (detect where the sounds are coming from) with frequencies below 100 Hz.
     With the deep bass soundwaves being longer than any room dimension in many individuals' rooms, this means the soundwave will leave the single sub and need to travel as far as it can in the room and then reflect off the first room boundary (floor, ceiling or wall) it meets then keep traveling in the reflected direction until it meets the next room boundary. This process continues until the soundwave runs out of energy and with each subsequent bass tone launched into the room by the single sub. 
    These numerous bass soundwaves of various frequencies launched into the room by the single sub, and reflecting off room boundaries, inevitably run into each other at various angles causing what are called a Bass Room Mode at each specific room location at which they meet or collide.  Depending on the specific angle at which the soundwaves meet, we perceive these bass room modes at specific spots in the room as either a bass overemphasis (bass peak), a bass attenuation (bass dip) or even a bass cancelation (bass null).  The result is an overall perception of the bass from a single sub as uneven or 'lumpy'.
     However, when a second sub is properly deployed and positioned in the room, the very interesting and useful principles of psychoacoustics (how our brains process sound and our perceptions of it) begin to come into play, which results in a perception that the bass is smoother, more detailed, better integrated with the main speakers and more natural or realistic.
      Unexpectedly, this is accomplished through the second sub actually significantly increasing the number of bass room modes (bass peaks, dips and nulls) in the room.  Our brains naturally process the presence of multiple bass soundwaves below 100 Hz, by adding them together by frequency and averaging them out.  This results in fewer bass modes being perceived in the room and a perception overall that the bass is smoother, more detailed, better blended with the main speakers and more natural.  

     Acoustical experts, such as Dr. Earl Geddes, Dr. Floyd Toole and others, have proven scientifically that in-room bass performance perception improves as more subs are added to virtually any given room, beginning with two subs and with improvements continuing up to the theoretical limits.  Of course, there's a practical limit to the acceptable number of subs in a domestic room. 
     I'm fairly certain the exact number of subs considered acceptable in a domestic room is higher for most men than most women but, interestingly, the scientists found significant bass performance gains were attained with each additional sub up to four but smaller more marginal gains were attained with each additional sub beyond four.

2. Better- Three SVS SB-1000 or PB-1000 subs for about $1,500 ($500 each) or three SVS SB-3000 subs for about $3,000 ($1,000 each).  Three properly positioned and configured subs in a given room typically provides bass response at a designated listening seat that's approaching the optimum quality level attainable at a single listening position. Three subs provide even further increased bass output capacity and impact as well as further increased bass dynamics due to the sharing of total bass requirements between three subs operating well within their limits and stress free with very large power reserves for sudden bass output dynamic demands.
     Psychoacoustic principles are more strongly applied with the use of three subs, as opposed to two subs, in any given room that results in the bass being perceived as even smoother, more detailed and better integrated with the main speakers.  

3. Best- The Audio Kinesis 4-sub Swarm distributed bass array(DBA) system for about $2,800.  This is a complete kit that includes four 4 ohm unamplified subs that are each 1' x 1' x 28", weigh 44lbs and have a 10" aluminum long-throw driver and a 1,000 watt class AB amplifier/controller that powers all four subs and controls the volume, crossover frequency and phase of all as a group.  
      The use of a 4-sub DBA system will provide near state of the art bass performance not only at a single listening position but throughout the entire room.  This is very useful if you have multiple seating positions in your room and prefer having very good audio at each position for both music and HT.

     Of course, only the designated listening position will be optimized for both bass response and midrange, treble response and stereo imaging but very good full-range audio will still be provided at each seating position.
     Since you also mentioned you want to add room treatments, another benefit of the 4-sub DBA option#3 is that absolutely no bass room treatments are necessary. You'd just need to incorporate room treatments for the midrange and treble response on your main speakers (first reflection points on each side wall and possibly some treatment on the front and rear walls).    
     You also could create your own custom 4-sub DBA system, rather than using the complete Swarm system, by utilizing four SVS SB or PB-1000 subs for about $1,900 ( $950 discounted price for a each pair of SVS subs).  The only down side is that you'd need to configure the volume, crossover frequency and phase settings individually for each of the four SVS subs rather than once for all four subs as a group on the Swarm system.  Here's a link to an Absolute Sound review of the A K Swarm system that is very accurate (I use this system in a 23'x16'x8' room with Magnepan main speakers and it works like a charm).

https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/audiokinesis-swarm-subwoofer-system/

     Sorry about the length of this post but I thought it was important to be thorough.

Tim
Hello pcc67,

     No problem.  Let us know your impressions after you listen to it for awhile.

Enjoy,
Tim
Hello tweak 1,

    I continue to be interested and intrigued by class D amps in general.  I know it's the best method for those with a limited budgets to attain very good performance in their systems because that's the main reason I tried my 1st one, a stereo Class D Audio SDS-440-CS amp, for $630 almost 10 years ago along with a healthy dose of curiosity.  
   I think once I realized, or any other new user who dares to give class D a try will quickly realize, just how well a good quality class D amp actually performs in their system this progresses naturally to thoughts, a strong interest and curiosity about the current and future capabilities of this not so new technology.  Of course, an adventurous approach to good system sound also requires its seekers to have the dual benefits of an open mind and a lack of an irrational allegiance to traditional amp technologies.
     In my case, this curiosity led to buying a 2nd class D amp, a stereo Emerald Physics EP-100.2SE amp and a 3rd, my current pair of D-Sonic M3-600-M mono-blocks.  I've noticed a significant upgrades in performance on my Magnepans with each amp but they all are very good and still in use in my combination 2-ch music and 5.4 surround system.
     I'm currently very satisfied with my system's overall performance but my curiosity about how good class D can perform still remains.  However I've also realized that to attain another significant upgrade in performance via a class D amp, it'll likely require buying one of the generally considered top performance echelon of class D amps such as a pre-owned pair of Merrill Veritas or Mola Mola Kartugas. 
     Ultimately, I believe the truth is that I'm just a music lover that's in search of a system that I really enjoy hearing music through.  Ideally, I know I want a system that sounds as close to live musicians playing in my room, or that I've been transported to a realistic venue the musicians are playing in.  The music has the same full range as live music from deep bass to high treble and all the tones in between, with the same dramatic dynamic range capacities and tonal accuracy.  I'm even okay with it being artificially enhanced if it means the soundstage images are more solid, stable and natural because that just gives the sense of more realism.  I get this high quality reproduction now on high quality recordings but think I'd just like it more often.
     I also realize that class D has no monopoly on high quality sound and, in the spirit of keeping an open mind, I'm not going to restrict my amp type options as I continue my search for further system improvements. I continue to prefer class D because of its many non-audio quality advantages, but sound quality and fidelity remain my primary concerns.


Tim
Hello mapman,

     Since Merrill came out with their new line of Element amps using the faster switching GaN transistors, they're getting a lot of pairs of Veritas back as trade-ins on the element amps.  Merrill told me they're checking these out thoroughly and making any necessary tune-ups and reselling them for about $5K/pair.  
   It looks like a good time to buy a pair if you're interested.  I've only read all the extremely positive reviews on these but never heard them in person.  But these have always seemed like ideal amps for me in both performance and form.
  I'm currently making two upgrades to my system; buying a pre-owned pair of Magnepan 3.7i to replace an almost 25 years old pair of 2.7QR and a Levinson 326S preamp to replace a Parasound Halo P-6 preamp.
 I also picked up a new Oppo 205, at an acceptable premium price of $2,100, to replace my current Oppo 105.  I'll be using the 205 and a 20 TB Synology NAS with a Lumin D2dac/streamer as sources.
     I believe my 1,200 watt D-Sonic mono-blocks and 3.7i speakers will prove to be a good match.  If not, I'll probably buy a pre-owned pair of Veritas from Merrill.  Could you share your impressions of the Veritas?

Thanks,
 Tim


Hey mapman,

     Did they create a good soundstage image with stable and solid images?

Thanx,
  Tim

    .