What is "biwiring"?

Hi Oakiris:
- Fm yr description, yr spkrs allow bi-wiring
- Yr receiver should work fine with two sets of wires connected, as you note.
- Running separate wires to each driver (biwiring) does make a difference -- which differences, when/if beneficial, are NOT commensurate with the financial outlay, IMO. Designer cables are expensive! Instead try hooking up the single cable to the top and then the bottom on yr centre spkr and check for preferred sound. If this isn't indicative, try the same on the main spkrs.
- No, they don't. If they aren't the same, the smaller gauge will go to the top (tweet/mid if applicable) and the thicker wire to the bottom spkr connector (typically the woof). If you're really bent on trying it out, look for some 18-22 g premium copper, insulated magnet wire and use that on top, keeping yr present wires for the lower spkr connection. Keep all wire lengths identical and take care not to short the connections! Cheers

"I have a set of B&W CM4 speakers and a center CMC speaker. They all have 2 sets of terminals; my dealer did not explain anything to me about "bi-wiring," [SIC] he just said that "true audiophiles" (?!?) just use the lower terminals..."

Sounds to me as if your dealer wouldn't know a true audiophile if one walked in the door. It's a cinch the dealer isn't one.

"From what I have read here, though, it would appear that my speakers are set up for bi-wiring [SIC] - is this correct?"

Yes. One pair of terminals drives the lower-frequency part of the crossover*; the other drives the high-frequency part of the crossover.

"My receiver is not set up for bi-wiring [SIC]..."

Amplifiers never are; they don't have the crossovers networks in them.

"..., but I reckon I can just use one terminal for 2 cables.:

Yes, one terminal pair.

"And, could anyone clarify whether or not bi-wiring makes a sonic improvement? Newbee said he didn't feel there was a meaningful difference, while Bgrazman said he thought it could make a pretty big difference. I realize it all depends on ones own ears and system, but I am curious, and would like to know if its worth the expense to experiment with this."

OF COURSE it's worth experimenting with it...or so many of us believe. (Do remember, Oak, that opinions about sound, music, and audio are like as......; everybody's got one and most of them stink. :-) ) Read Audioquest's blurb about it, here http://www.audioquest.com/ . ENTER, Cable Theory, page 5/10. Remove the jumpers between the 2 input-terminal pairs when biwiring.

"Also, if you use two cables to each speaker instead of the special - and expensive - biwire cable, I assume that both cables have to be the same brand and type."

Not so and probably not the best way to do it. Using identical cables gets you only the benefits of separating the 2 magnetic fields. (Read the AQ blurb.) Using different conductor sizes and/or different materials can gain you other audible benefits...and cost you a lot of money, too, maybe... READ more of this subject before playing much with biwiring.

* A 2-way speaker combines bass and mid frequencies in one driver and crossover section, while the 3 octaves of treble are handled by the tweeter. A 3-way speaker divides the frequencies, GENERALLY, with the bottom 3-4 octaves going to the woofer (and this is the lower part of the crossover), 2-3 octaves to the midrange, and 3 octaves to the tweeter. Most biwirable 3-ways combine the latter 2 sections and drive them with one pair of terminals and drive the woofer with the other pair of terminals.
.

All good advice, however...

It is a definite advantage to split the signal at the amp end and it is a must to use the same brand cable. Sounds like AQ are talking out of the wrong hole here. For the same reason that you must use the same length you must use the same cable. There is no point matching lengths if the basic electrical properties are all different. The signal getting to the various bits of the crossover must be in-phase and this simply will not happen if the electrons take different routes.

Is biwiring beneficial?
Opinion is divided mainly because the effect can be so different. If you have a relatively resistive wire going to insensitive speakers then the best thing to do would be to give the bass driver as much help as it can get, and go for a single-wire. No point in cossetting the treble if the bass driver is having problems getting its amps. Sensitive speakers don't experience the downside of biwiring nearly as much so its best to get the benefits of keeping the signals apart and go for the biwire option. Shotgunning gives the best of both worlds but then a single-wire configuration of cable twice as expensive becomes an option (an unfortunately good one for many of us).

If you have a relatively resistive wire going to insensitive speakers then the best thing to do would be to give the bass driver as much help as it can get, and go for a single-wire. No point in cossetting the treble if the bass driver is having problems getting its amps. Sensitive speakers don't experience the downside of biwiring nearly as much so its best to get the benefits of keeping the signals apart and go for the biwire option.

Good information, Nullgeodesic. Thank you.

Holly

"It is a definite advantage to split the signal at the amp end and it is a must to use the same brand cable. Sounds like AQ are talking out of the wrong hole here. For the same reason that you must use the same length you must use the same cable. There is no point matching lengths if the basic electrical properties are all different. The signal getting to the various bits of the crossover must be in-phase and this simply will not happen if the electrons take different routes."

Oh my; we're talking about the AUDIBLE differences of billionths of billionths of a second now? '...basic electrical properties are all different'? Hardly.

Audioquest has perhaps hundreds of years of combined experience on its staff of people who care very much about sound quality and how to optimize it thru cable. YOU suddenly are smarter than all of them? I doubt it.
.