The Biggest Disappointments in Rock and Roll


The history of rock music is a tale of squandered talent, over-hyped failures, and missed opportunities. In too many instances, the portend of greatness is followed by the all-too dismal reality. Here are my nominations for the biggest disappointments in rock.

1.The 80’s: 1976 through 1980 were the most exciting and innovative five years in the entire short history of rock music. Even though, by 1980, the punk revolt had petered out, there was an exciting “anything is possible” buzz in the music scene. The two minute, three chord, punk song had given way to some astonishing experimentation. I was enjoying noises as diverse as Gang of Four, Joy Division, Throbbing Gristle, Public Image Limited, and The Clash.
So, what happened? The airwaves were not conquered by these “post-punk”cohorts. Instead, it was the execrable “as if punk never happened” crew (e.g., Duran Duran, Huey Lewis and the News, Culture Club) that came to dominate. Hip-hop was the only music flourishing in the 80’s that broke new ground. Considering the promising way the decade started (i.e., 1980), it sure turned into a rotten decade for pop music.

2.The CD: The compact disc promised clean, crackle-free sound in a durable format (albeit at a higher price). It s soon became apparent that it was sonically inferior to the cheaper format that it had replaced. The compact disc rendered a sound that was sterile, compressed, and cold. Perhaps it was a fitting format for the cold, sterile synthpop of the day. Think about how much personal computers have improved in twenty years. It is truly scandalous that state of the art audio circa 1976 (i.e., a Linn Sondek turntable w/ all-tube amplification) has not been so dramatically improved upon. The compact disc was supposed to be a great leap forward. We got screwed.

3. Paul McCartney’s Solo Career: While there has since been a critical reappraisal in favor of John Lennon, at the time of the Beatle’s disintegration, it was McCartney who was believed to be the superior songsmith. His imminent solo career was awaited with the highest of expectations. While his solo career cannot be dismissed as a total failure, nobody is calling it an artistic triumph. “Silly Love Songs” and “Ebony and Ivory” do not a legend make.

4. US interest in Jamaican music died along with Bob Marley

5. The solo work of Led Zeppelin members: From the early to mid 70’s, Led Zep dominated the music scene. With the interesting exception of Robert Plant’s most recent album, none of the surviving members have released anything worth buying.

6. The Sex Pistols tour of The United States: This was supposed to be The Big One. Instead, they went to San Francisco, and proceeded to bite The Big One.

7. Elvis Presley’s post Sun Records music

8. The Stone Roses: After releasing what was, without a doubt, the most brilliant and beautiful album of the second half of the sorry ass 1980’s, this most promising of all bands then, as Monica Kendrick would put it, dropped the soap in the showers of the big record company. Barred from recording anything for nearly ten years, they sat out the Britpop explosion that they had created. When they did eventually get around to releasing a follow-up, it was nothing but some lame 70’s style guitar rock rehash. The Stone Roses remain rock’s greatest one-album wonder.

9. “End of the Century” (The Ramone’s Phil Spector produced fifth album): I wanted so much to like it. I was, and still am, an obsessed fan of both the Ramones and Phil Spector. The trouble was, it just didn’t work. It sounded trite, forced, and artificial. The tracks bespeak blatant toadying to the tastes of AOR programmers. Sure, it got more airplay than the previous Ramones releases; but at what price? This awkward disc didn’t give them the superstardom that their previous records should have earned them. The only thing worse than selling out is selling out, and finding no buyers.

10. The Ron Wood era Rolling Stones: Mick Taylor was by no means a first-division player when he was recruited for The Stones. However, with him on board, the Stones produced their very best work. Ron Wood was an established A-list player when he joined the band. At the time, the expectation was not only that, with Woodie on the team, The Stones could make records comparable to “Sticky Fingers” or “Exile on Main Street, ” it was even suggested that they would thus be able to make even better records! Instead, the Stones degenerated into a campy, overpriced, touring nostalgia act; kind of like a post-greaser Sha Na Na that charges 150 bucks a ticket.
tweakgeek
Hey Y'all,

I have to say I was/am very disappointed at what happened to Guns N Roses. When I first heard them in the Dirty Harry movie, don't remember which, I thought, holy sh*t, this band has cojones. The release of Appetite For Destruction was even more eye opening. The raw energy and melody intertwined to create a head banging sound that was, at the same time, a heart pumping adrenalin rush and not that hard to listen to. They hit their peek with Use Your Illusion I&II but shortly after that imploded. Axel Rose and Slash had a different vision of the direction the band should go in and they all went there separate ways. With the death Of Izzy Stradlin, the band was truly gone, no matter what Axel tried to do to bring them back this past year. I really felt this band had the talent and presence to be around for a long time. I guess I was wrong. It's not the first time and won't be the last......John
How bout the following:

1 - Kurt Cobain's suicide.
2 - Elvis dying young.
3 - Maybe not rock n' roll, but for Pop Music in general... The whole Milli Vanilli incident. This showed just how the mass audience of America can be totally deceived.
4 - Just about everything David Bowie and Lou Reed did from the 80's to today.
5 - MOST oF THE ROCK THAT IS BEING PUT OUT TODAY!

KF
Clearly, I have a different perspective on the quality of product in the time periods you mention.

I personally think that by 1976-80 rock was already dead, and I could not agree with your "exciting and innovative" description of the stuff you mention from those years. I think that there were 2 main kinds of popular music at that time(excluding the dreaded disco) and they were either imitators of the first "English Invasion" of the early to mid 60s, or a bunch of really talentless street dreck that tried to pick up instruments and thrash around proclaiming their "angst". I found that entire genre quite revolting and worthless. The "New Wave" was not innovative, but copiers attempting to cash-in on a previously proven formula, and the other type was just pure junk.

So while I am in agreement with your general premise, that the post 80s pop music scene has sunk to incredibly low levels, I would include the period after 1976 as well, and really even after 1973, except for a couple of decent albums by some of the bands that hadn't totally petered out yet.

The truly innovative stuff that happened during the time you mentioned was the fusion era, where all the real musicians went to stay away from the horrible downslide that was happening to pop music.

Never really liked the Stones, anyway, regardless of era. McCartneys first 2 albums were very good.

Totally agree with your assessment of the CD.
Without a doubt, Todd Rundgren.

Utopia was a decent and highly promising prog rock band that put out some good records, but as the 70's drew to a close, they were already mutating into a new-wave pop outfit. "Adventures in Utopia" was the last sign of life.

Todd Rundgren then set out on his own to conquer pop, and began singing... BALLADS! Yuck. With "I Don't Want to Work" being his only notable post-70's work (and basically 80's kitsch), you can call his solo career a complete and total wipeout.