2. analog
  3. 1235854065

Supex 900 question

Hi,
I recently came into a Supex 900 Super. Compared to an AT150MLX I have, it sounds warm, smooth, full bodied. The AT is much more three dimensional, airy and transparent.

When I run them both on the Hi-Fi News Test Record, the AT tracks like a champ. No problem with tracks 6-8. The Supex on the other hand only tracks 6 and buzzes substantially on 7 and 8. Both were set up with a Mint LP protractor. The Supex though was much more difficult to align because the cantilever is more pushed back and shorter. I think I got it right, maybe not quite as exact, but certainly better than I could with a worse protractor.

Are these tracking problems symptoms that the Supex may have suspension issues and need to be rebuilt? Or are they traditionally poor trackers?

I would love to get that smooth sound with a little more of the transparency of the AT.

Thanks,
Greg
gregmeier
stanwal's avatar
stanwal
3,147 posts
 
What are you tracking the Supex at and what arm are you using? What is its mass? I use to be a Supex dealer in the 70s and 80s.
bcoasis
11 posts
 
Hi Greg, I have a 909 mk2 which was rebuilt by the Garrotts to great effect. It tracks very well fwiw. To me it's kind of a 'poor man's' Koetsu if you can excuse the expression ;-) I use mine on either an Ikeda IT-345 or an SME 1012R.
gregmeier OP
3 posts
 
Hi Stanwal, I have a KAB modified Technics SL12xx with the standard tonearm and fluid damper. I am tracking at 1.8. Do you think my problems could be a set up issue?
gregmeier OP
3 posts
 
Hi Bcoasis, Thanks for your response. I am considering sending the cartridge for a rebuild. What other cartridges do you use and how does the Supex compare?
More to discover