Sonus Faber Concertino or B&W 805 or else

Sonus Fabers are warm and romantic sounding, B&W is more "precise" sounding and analytica.

You'll hear more detail with the B&W, and the SF will make your worse recordings sound better.

I would guess you would prefer the SF

The combination of MF/A85 with B&w 805 would be dry and analitical..even for jazz music.The power of A85 is not enough for the 805.While the analog section of the Arcam is very good(I,m using their FMJ preamp,now for sale),their amps are not that good.I would choose Revel M22 monitors or upgrade the amp.

Thanks for your input guys! That's my initial thought about B&W 805. I always think that B&W is a little too bright and analytical for my taste. I auditioned ATC SCM19 and I like the warmth sound from these speakers. Unfortunately, they are above my price range (around $3200/pair). I'm going to audition SF Concertino and VA Haydn. I'm not sure if there is Revel dealer in my area, but I'll look. What do you guys think about VA Haydn? Or how about Focal?

I write this from the standpoint of someone who just went through a similar process and ended up with the Sonus Faber Concertino Domus. What tipped the scales was when I put on some live recordings from solo acoustic shows I pulled from arhive.org. These suffice as my anti-reference that I bring along to audio shops just for argument sakes. The Concertinos made those fun to listen to.

30 minutes later with some respectable source material it was case closed and out came the checkbook.

Out of couriosity - what if a fair price for new Concertinos?