SACD Source recording


Some recently acquired SACD are sounding better...maybe they are learning how to make them.

I can recommend DG 474 639-2 Bach Violin Concertos, Hilary Hahn. As I listened to it, and appreciated the excellent sonics, I perused the liner notes, and there in black and white is something that I had heard mentioned before. The source recording for this DSD disc is identified as 24-bit PCM. Of course this is just like a DVD-A, except that with the DVD-A one extra conversion to DSD is avoided. I bet that most SACD have been mastered on 24-bit PCM equipment, but not every disc manufacturer is up front about it.

I have no complaints about the sound, but I think that Sony and the SACD crowd should tone down the hype about DSD, and recognize DVD-A as equal.
eldartford
"SACD croud"...I really didn't want to get another SACD vs DVD-A contest going. If you think SACD sounds better that's your opinion. In my opinion the differences are mainly due to how the particular discs were made, and your discs may very well favor SACD. Mine have favored DVD-A, but there are enough good SACD in my collection to indicate that this is a disc-by-disc thing.

My point is that if SACD sounds better, it can't be because 24-bit 96KHz PCM code is deficient, because many SACD have been through that format on their way to your player.
Nothing beats the Beck SACD "Sea Change" in the acoustic pop category. All rock on DVD-A is mushey in comparision. No vote on classical yet but Orff is kicking butt.
That's right, it is my opinion. I guess I'm part of the SACD crowd because I prefer it to DVD-Audio, but I certainly would'nt ask you to recognize SACD as being equal to DVD-Audio, would I? That would be much too presumptuous of me. For the record, I prefer pure DSD recordings to all others. Most of my best SACD's are classical(Telarc), but I agree with Imin2u about Beck's "Sea Change", it's excellent. I really wish we could get more 24 bit 192Khz recordings on DVD-Audio, because I'm not set up for multi-channel and I want the best they can give in stereo. Gary.
Guss2...Boy! It doesn't take much to set the SACDS crowd off! All I said is that a SACD which is made from a 24-Bit 96KHz master cannot be superior to a DVD-A except with respect to differences in the way a particular disk is mastered and the quality of the player used.

"Pure" DSD recordings are not common, and there is a lot of 24-bit mastering equipment out there which record companies are not going to scrap any time soon.
Eldartford,I don't totally disagree with you. SACD's derived from PCM masters can sound excellent. I just read my post again and I'm sorry if it came off a little knee jerked. I listen to a lot of classical and there are more Pure DSD's in this genre than most, but I prefer analog masters to PCM. This does'nt mean I've given up on DVD-Audio,not at all. Since I'm a stereo guy, do you have any recommendations for me that could knock my socks off. I've heard "The Nightfly" is great and I'd love to get the new "Sinatra at the Sands". What do you think? Any others? Gary. P.S. I may start a thread on the subject.