Rotel RA 972 or NAD 320BEE

Viridian hit it right on the head. I also prefer the Rotel, but expect that you may prefer the NAD. I find the latter sounds muddy to me, but that is the "warmth" that some people like. There is a noticeable difference, and it's a matter of taste. It would be great if you could demo for yourself.

- Eric

Thanks for the responses. I should really try to demo this stuff before I buy it, I am leaning towards the NAD though. Now, I'm thinking of going for the C352. I live in a small NYC apartment though, and I'm not sure if I'll just be getting more power than I really need.

Power specs on teh c352 are almost identical to the C320. I have both units here in the store and while both perform very well at their given price-points the C320 is a bigger bang for the buck.

The NAD320BEE is a great unit, its the NAD entry level integrated amplifier BUT the Rotel RA972, is not the entry level Rotel integrated amplifier.

You are better off comparing something like the Rotel RA931 or 935 integrated to the NAD 320, they are in the same league in performance and cost approximately.

The 972AX is a more sophisticated piece by Rotel and cost more, it is a 60watter with a huge toroid and the unit actually weighs around 16- 17lb actually.

I prefer the Rotel in performance, slow start circuit design with plent of options as well unlike most of the entry level Rotel design of that generation. (Pre option/ Headphone /Speaker option / Detechable Powercord and remote).

Very Gutsy piece and a little more forward sounding, get the right speakers and you will be scratching your head for sure.

If your budget is tight, try it with the B&W 303 with good stands and good source, you will be moving and dancing for a while....if your budget is better, try a pair Quad 11L's or 12L's with it.........superb combo.

Good luck

Rapogee