Review of Dartzeel NHB-108 Amplifier


Dartzeel is a relatively new entry to the high-end game. Despite being reviewed by John Marks in a recent issue of Stereophile, the company's only current product offering, the NHB-108 stereo amplifier, hasn't gotten a lot of press on these shores. Hopefully this "review" will do its part in rectifying that.
As many of you probably already know, Switzerland-based Dartzeel is the brainchild of one Herve Deletraz. Herve is a wonderful guy who's dedicated to the very best customer service. As essentially a one-man operation, I'm sure his time is limited, but he's always responded to my e-mails in an extremely courteous, timely manner.

On to the amp. I'm not one for technical details, so I'll leave them to those of you who want to visit Dartzeel's website. Basically, the 108 is a "purist" stereo amp rated at a relatively modest 100 wpc. Its smallish dimensions belie its weight, which measures around 65-70 pounds.

Internally, the amp is incredibly well laid out (if tightly packed), with an attention to detail that one should expect--but doesn't always receive--from components in this price range.

Outside, it's purely love-hate. (Refer to the website for pictures). Either you get it or you don't. Personally, I've grown used to its appearance over time, but it's taken a while to become acclimated. If WAF factor is any sort of issue, practice up on your compliments. Then again, I may be overstating the case. While it's not Liv Tyler, it's not Janet Reno, either. Time reveals its inner beauty.

Performance-wise it's a much more straightforward issue. In my experience the 108 is the most balanced, natural-sounding amp I've ever heard. It has a way with timbre that's downright spooky--up there with the very best tube units one cares to mention. The sound is just "right"--every note is reproduced with a tonal correctness and warmth that is as close to the real thing as I've heard in an amp. Because of it's sheer naturalness, it can take a while to overcome the initial impression that it is somehow soft or rolled off. That is most emphatically not the case! Dynamics are crisp and fast, and the frequency extremes are right where they need to be--not overstated or highlighted at all, just perfectly natural and realistic.

The only potential weakness of the 108 is its power rating. It flows a nice amount of juice for 100 watts, but one could theoretically run into problems with particuarly current-hungry or inefficient speakers. Part of the amp's midrange purity, I believe, is attributable to the use of the bare minimum of bipolars in the output stage. That, of course, comes at the price of power, but in this case the tradeoff is more than worth it. Just take some care in speaker matching--as you should, anyway--and you'll be rewarded with a sound that balances the very best of solid state with a midrange that will make some question whether they even need to fuss with tubes.

Despite its novel physical appearance, the need for careful speaker matching, and the fact that the US dollar has been taking a Tyson-like beating lately, the Dartzeel is a serious contender in the super-amp category. Yes, there are amps out there that do this or that "better" than the 108, but I've yet to hear one that strikes a better balance between the various areas of performance. It's a stunning piece of engineering and a landmark amplifier.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Product Weakness: Appearance is strictly take-it-or-leave-it. Power rating requires some attention to speaker load. Cost.
Product Strengths: Naturalness, midrange magic of the highest order, speed, dynamics

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Associated Equipment for this Review:
Amplifier: Dartzeel NHB-108
Preamplifier (or None if Integrated): EMM Labs DCC2
Sources (CDP/Turntable): EMM Labs CDSD
Speakers: Von Schweikert VR-4 Jr.
Cables/Interconnects: Jena Labs Pathfinder
Music Used (Genre/Selections): Rock, blues, country, some classical
Room Size (LxWxH): 24 x 20 x 7
Room Comments/Treatments: Echo Buster, ASC
Time Period/Length of Audition: 3 months
Other (Power Conditioner etc.): Shunyata Hydra-8
Type of Audition/Review: Product Owner
hooper
I still wouldn't put it that way. Musicians doesn't NEED anybody really. Many musicians didn't get to where they are because they wanted to have a record out. Hell, many of them actually don't care whether or not there's an audience. Music is played for their own enjoyment. It's not played for anyone else or nothing else. Of course, many artists do enjoy having an audience appreciate their music. So some may feel the need for an audience. It's great that their music becomes recorded so others can enjoy their performances. It's great that their performance doesn't become lost. I don't mean to be ignorant but to say musicians NEED people like you is pushing it IMO. That's not to say all musicians don't need record engineers, but most of them really don't. The musicians themselves can take a page from Greg Osby and bring their own recording equipment such as a minidisc player and record themselves. And it's great that we have a lot of Charlie Parker and Dizzy performances. Okay so someone has to develop the recording equipment, but as bad as some of their recordings are, their musicality is NOT obscured. Their creativity is NOT obscured. You will never know the intention of many artists even if they told you. And don't dispute the word of mouth. Many great artists are still legends without having recorded a single album. Their influence and music still lives in some people. So even if I have the most inaccurate equipment, it wouldn't even matter. It brings happiness to one person: me.
"Cinematic systems,let's just say that my "Buddies" really don't "guess" at anything.They are skilled and experienced hobbyists that have been at this longer than you,or myself,most likely.I believe that they would find your condescending comments humorous,as we are pretty adamant about how sensitive the "average" ear becomes,once you have been at this hobby awhile."

Yeah I know. I think pretty much everybody has mentioned that to me at one time or another.

" wide variety of "known" program material",

What exactly do you know about it? Can you tell me what Microphone/preamps/board/Mastering etc. What is your reference speaker, the one used by the studio? The only thing you know is that it sounds good to you, but what is that exactly? You have Avalons right? Why? Why did you buy them over all the other options? What makes them special, try to answer that question using a vocabulary that would allow me to apply it to my situation. Musical, accurate, revealing are not helpful.
Mike, do you think you will be looking at the possibility of getting low powered amps like the LAMM ML2.1 for your new speakers or do you still feel that the Tenor 300s are the real deal?
Sadeek; my plan is to compare the DarTZeel and Tenor 300 Hybrid Monos on the VR9's. i do have experience with the Tenor 75 watt OTL's and have heard the ML2's numerous times at shows. the VR9's would be just fine with either the Tenor OTL's or the ML2's......a matter of taste.

yes, the Tenor 300 watt monos are the real deal.....the best all-around amp i have yet heard (the DarTZeel may be better but too soon to say for sure).

the ML2's (or ML2.1's) are very nice but have never really 'engaged me' onto the music.....as both Tenor amps and the DarTZeel have.

maybe someday i'll get the chance to spend some quality time with the ML2's in my system and have a better feel for their magic. the VR9's would seem an ideal speaker for the ML2......then again the VR9's are likely ideal for about any amp with their efficiency and no need to provide deep bass drive.
Howie, Thank you for your help in expressing one of the quintessential obstacles to allowing this hobby to move forward.

"Where did I give you the impression that I was trying to "elevate" myself into the creative process?"

"Musicians doesn't NEED anybody really."

"So even if I have the most inaccurate equipment, it wouldn't even matter. It brings happiness to one person: me."

Let me post this again so everyone understands the context.

"from an objective stand point do I suit myself(inserting myself in the production) with the system I design or do I suit the artist (pursue absolute sound)."


I guess the word is that I went over the top in response to your post but I was responding to what you were really going to say. Notice how you "elevated" this conversation up and out of my context and out of the context of this forum. Your attempt to make me irrelevant and belittle me. Good thing we're not playing chess?

See many people who would criticize me for being harsh with you didn't realize where you were going. You were going here. If you're not a musician you're irrelevant and even if we don't know what were doing. LOL! Gotta love "jazz".

Howie continues;

"I don't mean to be ignorant but to say musicians NEED people like you is pushing it IMO."

See this would be the arrogance I spoke of, not ignorance.

This is where you "elevate" yourself above the objective constraints of this conversation to persuade me that you're "enlightened" and I am not. How could a thug like me understand, its true for me it was football or music as a child and unfortunately I was instantly good at football, so it was the choice I made. So now I can hack away at the keyboard, but I'm slowly im proving.