Having owned the X600s and now LAMM M2.1s, I would STRONGLY recommend the LAMM amps. Although the XA160s are sonically more like the Pass amps of old with a smoother presentation and more musical than the X600's, the Lamm amps are that much more refined. As far as driving the Andra's are concerned, just how loud do you listen? The LAMM 2.2 will drive just about anything and most people rarely use more than 30 watts of power. Using the LAMM M2.1 and the LL2 Preamp, I never turn my volume dials past 9 o'clock (about 10 watts in my system). It's also a hybrid unit where the Pass product is all solid state. The X600s lacked personallity to me and were uninvolving driving the extremely musical ESP Loudspeakers Concert Grands. Although the X600s could drive them loudly ( which was done as a test for a friend) they didn't make music for me. If your music choices and listening habits are in the LOUD arena then maybe the X600s are for you. If you're like me and listen to a wide range of acoustic and electronic music (that excludes Rock and Rap) you'll want a world class product that tells the truth. Long story short, if you're looking for solid state that sounds like tubes, do yourself a favor seek out, listen and buy LAMM M2.2s and forget everything else. Been there, done that!
Pass XA 160 vs. Lamm Hybrids m1.2- 2.2 amps
I am considering one of these amps to drive a pair of Eggleston Andra 2's . My system consists of a First Sound Pres Del. Mk. 2, Aesthetix Io MK. 2, Basis 2500, Graham 2.2, Koetsu cart. AA capitole mk. 2, KS Emotion cabling throughout. I'm looking for warm, lush mids ( Yes! Tube-like) to compliment the dynamics of my line and phono preamps, while driving the Andras with ample headroom, and fully fleshed out, dense images. I would very much appreciate hearing from anyone who may have any experience with either or even better, both amps. Thanks
- ...
- 8 posts total
- 8 posts total