My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


jays_audio_lab

Showing 50 responses by carey1110

Viber 6. You present a very interesting and compelling argument.  For more purity removing the EQ will also give more purity don’t you think. Isn’t the EQ adding Or shaping the sound to make your music more like you want it as apposed to ultimate purity and clarity. While I may agree with what you are saying in the literal sense my preference is still the preamp over the “extreme purity” more  engaging To me.  It draws me in more. Some prefer the sound of the violin, some the horn, and some the sax. They can all play the same song but some people will prefer one over the other.  Stereos can be like that, they can play the same music,  some people  prefer the warmth of tubes, or Some solid state, some with panels some with cone speakers, some with a preamp and some without one. Even tho we have different preferences we still like the music. That is what brings us to this thread.  Hearing the difference perspectives helps us understand and maybe even change our own a bit. Nice well thought out post, lot of good points.  I find WC’s videos very interesting in that I can hear a lot of different equipment and draw my own conclusions  while still hearing what others think as well.  I always find it amazing how the same video can have some many different interpretations. Great stuff. 
I love the Wilson speakers.  This is what one reviewer said:
"The Alexia Series 2 conveys a feeling of ‘togetherness’, and I don’t mean just a more cohesive and integrated sound than the original due to better temporal accuracy.
It draws you into the performance conjured up by the musicians, making you feel you are part of it. I reveled in the wonder of a soundstage of Biblical dimensions glittering with pin-sharp detail set in a sea of ambience cues.
Macro and microdynamics were perfectly balanced, improving the sense of pace and rhythm, bass went deeper – though don’t expect a free ride to the center of the Earth – while midrange transparency saw all veils from vocals removed. I was enthralled. And this was from a seating position four meters away from the speakers"

It draws you into the performance conjured up by the musicians, making you feel you are part of it. I reveled in the wonder of a soundstage of Biblical dimensions glittering with pin-sharp detail set in a sea of ambiance cues.

I think EQs have merit and in some system will show amazing results. Just like tone controls on the D’Agostino gear. I have a friend who has one and is scrutinized by his audiophile friends. However when they are over listening to his system and he compares with it in and with it out they all prefer it with EQ engaged.  Myth # 11- EQs are bad and degrade the sound. 
Techno your comment makes me think you’ve never heard them. Very unusual response to Wilson. A long standing speaker manufacturer sitting in more high end system than any other speaker out there. I doubt that is the result of building lousy speakers. I think there is more to it than you describe. IMHO
Techno there’s no panic I just stated my opinion as you did. I’m not a dealer or promoter etc. I just know them well. 
Yes I’m am biased and I’m  not  the only one. If you were familiar with them you might be too. Sorry I can’t help it. Owned so many brands of speakers I can’t even count them. This one is special to me.

In comparing the DAWs to the Alexia’s I felt the Alexia 2 is much better. The highs are crisp but not etched. Much more organic, natural and live. I found that the Alexia 2 is more revealing than the DAW in that it gives you the entire picture top to bottom not just fine detail in the upper register. The wood of instruments Are More apparent and the strings of a wood instrument 🎻 more amazingly life like. Very subtle changes in the music are more evident . However it can still bite where the music calls for it. The bell of horns very obvious and can be in your face if recorded that way. I listen at lower volume than most and want to hear all the details Without having to crank it. The Alexia 2 does this for me. I find the this speaker will reveal the electronics no matter what. If you put a warm Tube Mac on them they will sound warm and rolled off. I have been experimenting with different preamps and feel this speaker to be very neutral and without prejudice. I also feel it was more coherent over all than the DAW due to the dissimilar woofers. My room is 17’ x 20’+ And behind me opens into the rest of the house. I have a cathedral ceiling with 18-20’ sloping ceiling. My speakers are placed very similar to the DAWs I had. The DAW was a bit lean and maybe on the bright side in my room so the Alexia works perfect. Remember even though the upper drivers are the same the crossover is different. If my room was smaller I think I’d still go with the Alexia 2. Hope this helps in giving another perspective on the Wilson Alexia 2




Viber I think we all agree that live is better than reproduced. That’s not the same as comparing two reproductions. Like two audio systems.  The differences lie in what each of us determines as what is closer to live.  In what way it is closer to live.  Your preference is pretty clear I think.  You said 1st row front and center. Some prefer mid hall so their “closer to live” may differ from yours. 
Greyhound- Thats a Good point and may be true that some are like that. Some will buy gear for many different reasons I guess.  Some for the music,  some for the looks, some some the pride of ownership,  etc. Some like a Rolex Watch I just use my phone to tell time. So I just take what I can use from this for my purpose and leave the rest of it alone. It does often seem the discussion gets off track I agree. It is what it is I guess. 
Ok so performance and preference are two different things. However I will agree that performance doesn’t necessarily translate to preference. This is why there is such contention here. When you say performance what does that mean? Better bass, more detail bigger soundstage better focus, less distortion, better frequency extremes etc. the Mephisto may very well be have better performance in many areas but some will still prefer the McIntosh even if it has lower “performance“ as evidenced by XYZ. I have heard some ridiculously expensive speakers and amps and I can appreciate what they do. However I can sit down with a pair of old Quad 57s and prefer them in many ways to the more expensive stuff. It depends on what you value in in the musical presentation . Some prefer tubes some Prefer solid state. I may like the less dynamic rolled off sound. Doesn’t mean it outperforms the expensive speaker it just means I prefer it. Stating one is “Better” will alway receive opposition. No one can argue with your preference, it’s yours. If you say you prefer the McIntosh then you prefer it and that is fine. McIntosh is famous for their sound drawing a lot of people in. Also there is something to be said for price, this business of cost no object is BS. Cost always enters into it period. I thought the McIntosh was very nice sounding. Do I prefer it long term probably not. I prefer more detail and neutrality because I think I’d get bored after a while because I know how I am.  However without Hearing it more or owning it I wouldn’t know for sure. 
I think people Here are into gear and music both. Some are more into the music some into gear. My wife loves music but it makes no difference to her if it’s on her Bose radio or my high end system. If she likes a song she likes it. She is into music. When you prefer a particular quality of Music reproduction now the gear comes into play and you become an audiophile . WC loves the gear and he will tell you that but not one without the other. Maybe he leans towards the gear more than some but that’s what this thread and his videos are about, the differences in gear. If it was total music we’d be discussing specific performers and concerts, musicians, talents etc. The “gear” interests everyone here, music preferences are different but gear is more what we can relate to each other through.  Some like led zeppelin others Mozart But most here like It if it’s played through a good music system. That’s why we discuss the gear not the music. However I feel a good system allows you the music and the gear disappears. Then it’s hard not to discuss the music. 
I think the products speak for themselves.  No need to defend a champion he can do that himself. No product really needs defending either you’ll like it or you won’t. Your opinion is your vote. You cast you vote and let the pieces fall where they may. 
Viber
 I own the Rossini as well.  The settings are 0.2v, 0.6v, 2v, and 6v. I was told by my dealer that I should use the 2v setting if I’m using a preamp and 6v if direct however I find  the 2v setting to be better in both applications so maybe you assumptions are correct. There is a DCS user group forum where a lot of this technical discussion takes place. You might want to check it out. 


Here’s the thing with trying to make judgements of a system over you tube. You are listening to music that has been reproduced then played into a microphone re-recorded, played through a computer or another system completely different. I’m amazed we can hear the differences that we do hear. The best you can hope for is a very rough idea of the differences. This is flavored by everything in the chain including what system we play it back on. That’s why there is such a wide range of responses to the same video. Therefore it’s very important to get some input from the person who is there listening in person. Who owns and is familiar with the gear. I think it sounds great with my headphones, someone else may may think it’s awful with their system. So consider this possibility before we challenge each other so readily. 
Kren0006. I agree I’m just trying to understand why every once in a while someone comes in out of left field with a 180 degree view that to me doesn’t seem to make since. Most people seem to agree except for some minor variations. Then you get that way out there opinion, I’m just trying to figure out what may cause it that’s all.
Viber- I understand your preference but the problem is how do you know when the glass is clear unless you were standing in front of the violin when it was recorded. I guess the point is it’s never completely clear. Maybe the illusion of clear. What you hear every time you listen to a recording is the recording engineers preference. Maybe thats not your preference, Maybe you prefer the mic to be closer or back further etc. this is why there are so many different successful manufacturers of audio gear. However I believe this latest system of WC’s should be checking most of the box for you. Am I right? Viber I have one question for you,  do you prefer a particular violin?  If so why?
Viber So therefore your preference Is a detailed sound with some brilliance and sweetness. Others may prefer a different violin because of its warmth, softness and wooden character neither of which is wrong. So when you hear a recording it’s not necessarily the truth of the recording you are looking for but perhaps to change it to a more brilliant sound with a bit of tonal sweetness. Even tho this may not be exactly how this recording sounds. Therefore maybe you prefer a “coloration” of brilliance and sweetness.  Colorations aren’t just warmer or veiled they are any deviation from the original recording.  Perhaps you as well enjoy some forms of coloration. 
Viber- I will have to yield to your knowledge and expertise when it come to knowIng what a live instrument sounds like up close.  However some people prefer Carnegie Hall to the Boston Symphony hall because  of the sound of the hall and music combo.   So if the recording is done in Carnegie I’m not going to try to make it sound like the Boston symphony hall.  I too like a very transparent neutral sound if the recording is good. I can appreciate both camps. Also I can appreciate where you are coming from wanting every little detail up close.  I also believe that comparing to a live instrument is great if you know it’s sound where it was recorded, what space, was it a studio etc. Therefore we just have to choose the sound we like and enjoy. Something that draws you in and makes you want to sit and enjoy.  Just like you prefer one hall over another,  you will prefer one system over another, one speaker, or one amp. I like getting your perspective because I know you know live sound well.  Thankyou for sharing you knowledge of live music and how certain equipment compares. 
Viber- very good example of the violin and I certain understand the importance of electrostats and their ability to reproduce certain aspects of that sound and why you prefer them. Ultimate detail etc. I’m sure that piece would sound great on a Nice pair of quad 57s.  
Twoleftears- I agree if a system can reproduce  a large orchestra accurately it will be an amazing system. It really is the ultimate test for a great audio setup. If it can do that right everything else if a piece of cake.
Agree with you zprr,  this thread is listed under category of amps and preamps but lately has been all about speakers. 
Hard to say what belongs here and what doesn’t. Threads have a tendency to take on a life of their own and evolve in many different directions. You’ll never change that. Topics will vary according to everyone’s input. Just the way it is. You ride the wave you like, when it’s over you just paddle back out and wait for the next one you like. Pretty simple.🏄🏻‍♂️
thezaks. I agree. No one should can or will keep it on track. The thread will flow as it will. Some people try to police the thread and they sound hilarious. Like they are WCs thread bodyguard or groupie. Lol 😂 
WC I agree with you 100%. So happy you are enjoying your new speakers. I’m sure they are simply amazing. 
Oooh guess I hit a sensitive spot. 🤐. Hey it’s a thread on Audiogon. Some will take more serious than others I guess. 
Lol!!  I think you have it backwards. The Mephisto draws enough power to DRAIN the entire house.
WC I know a lot of people who could but would never put that kind of money in a system. It’s not about how much money you have it about how into this you are. I know people who save,  scrimp and go to great lengths to own this stuff and others that could easily buy it but think it’s ridiculous to put that kind of money in a music system. Its about priorities and It’s all about how bad you want it. Just like heroin addicts some how they find a way to come up with thousands of dollars a day for their addiction.  Most of us live vicariously through you WC because we don’t want to spend the money. More fun you watch you LOL
First of all there are only a few people that buy the ultra high end like you’re talking about probably fewer than most people realize.  So what kind of person would buy a Wilson Chronisonic?  Personally I only know of one person that owns a pair,  he’s on The Wilson community group on Facebook.  The other question is  how much do they listen. In my mind I think if I owned those they’d be playing all day everyday. However I think the reality is that you get used to what ever you own and the”equipment excitement” fades and now you listen to music and no longer worry about the equipment. Once you are at the top there is only the music and equipment is not questioned.   Then there are also the real equipment junkies who live for the rush of a different piece with a different flavor. We will never be satisfied with just the music. We need to hear it presented in as many different ways as we can find. We are what keeps the manufacturers and dealers going. They love us. 
One thing I have found over the years is that without a doubt cables sound different from each other in most high end systems.  They even measure differently. However spending extreme amounts of money on a cable doesn’t guarantee a better sound. It’s all synergy here. There are situations where cheap cables can sound way better depending on the system. I’ve also found that all the same cable through out the system doesn’t always get the best results tho it is a good starting point in order to figure out what the cable does.  Those that say cables don’t make a difference just are listening or don’t have a very high end system. That being said cables are probably the most overpriced category in high end,  have the highest mark up and loose value very quick. Unfortunately for now we still need them. 
I’m not understanding what you mean by mechanical, acoustical and electronic embeddings. Can you explain?
Mahgister- of course any you tube video will sound different than your home system with the CD for so many reasons I can’t even begin to tell you.  To start with how are you listening to the video?
Your system has plenty of bass but probably not sub bass. I’ve heard the Alexx with D’Agostino gear along with a Six Pack of Rel subs. The difference is pretty amazing when they are tuned right. At first the differences seems subtle but after while you don’t want to be without it.  Soundstage explodes in size and depth. Even instrument tones take to a whole new level. These were crossed between 16-20 Hz. The room was only about 16x18. Very nice effect and not overpowering as it may seem. 
Chayro- you make a very good observation. It’s all goal dependent I agree. 
I agree with many of the difference above. I like both for the own strengths. The Gryphon is really impressive out of the gate but for the long haul I think I’d opt for the D’Agostino gear.  The #1 think for me is for the system to do no harm. By that I mean if there is any annoyance at all then I don’t want it. That annoyance will continue to grow if it is there. The Gryphon Mephisto does check all the audiophile boxes very well as does the D’Agostino. However I just think the D’Agostino will have less ear fatigue and is a sound I could listen to for hours, regardless of what it doesn’t do. Very musical. All this is based on the video and I’m sure I could be happy with either as they are that close in their ability to provide outstanding music reproduction. 

When measuring SPL keep in mind that it depends on what frequency spectrum you are measuring.  If you are measuring a system that goes down to 16 hz,  like when using big subs or huge speakers,  90 db may not be too bothersome. However if the system only goes down 30hz and you play it at 90db now most of you SPL is coming from the higher frequencies which likely be uncomfortable. So the bass extension will significantly affect the SPL measurements. Everyone would need to be using the same weighted measurement in order to compare. 

I think Jays statement about the Chronosonic is his  April fools joke lol!!  Don’t get your hopes up.