Mark Levinson 336 vs Krell 600c

I feel the ML - 336 would be the superior choice for your set up. I agree with the above - the Krell usually has a tendency to sound bright and edgy and I don't feel would be a good match with B&W. Some will say you don't need that much power (both the Krell FPB 600 and the ML 336). I would tend to disagree - the more power the better. Loudness is not where its at with power, but the current capacity and the loudspeaker control it can provide. I don't blame you for wanting a powerful amp. But again I think the ML 336 would give you great control, no coloration, and a smoothness and naturalness that the Krell would be less likely to provide. But this is just my opinion and yours and your ears will ultimately matter and count the most!! Happy listening.

Phil

**I do not I agree with the statements saying that Krell and B&W are not a good match.
**I have actively bi-amped B&W800's driven my all Krell and the sound is "to die for." ... in my opinion.
Richard

Have had experience with both the FPB 300 & 600 series amps by krell...they are neither bright or lifeless, they are some of the most incredible amps on the market today, the top end is smooth, listenable for hours and the bass, well I'll just say that it is the tightess, fastest and articulate that I have ever heard. The FPB600 would not be an overkill for your speakers, more than likely they would probably have your B&W's dancing in your room, I must say that a tube preamp worked best in my setup with the FPB600.

In my opinion the No 336 is to powerful for the N802. Why you don't try the No 335. Same sound, just a little bit less power, but much cheaper!

Thanks for all of you help,i think i'll try the ML336,though it seems they are no clear losers.