2. speakers
  3. 1208782342

In room response

Hello, Lately I have noticed more talk of in room freq response measurements. It has been mentioned in regards to room treatment, subwoofers and their intergration, speaker placement, room size, crossover points, listening volume levels, speaker choices in regards to the type of music you listen to and a myriad of other reasons. I for one fell it is quite important and others seem to disagree to its importance in playback of recorded music.

This thread would be a great place for members to discuss its importance, ramifications, reason for being and to discuss results.

I have seen a few members who allready have posted results of the measurements under their "systems page". I just recently posted my freq response and waterfall graph on my "system" link.

I am quite sure that there are members who have allready done in room measurements of freq response, waterfall and RT60 or other measurements. If you are new to this, a program can be downloaded for FREE at the Home Theatre Shack, it is called the Room EQ Wizard. See link below. It would be used for mesurment only for our purposes, although it can be used with equalizers such as Behringer if you so desire.

http://www.hometheatershack.com/roomeq/

The only thing you need to provide is a sound level meter, which everyone should own, even if you don't use this program. A very inexpensive one is available from Radio Shack and is a welcome addition to any audiophiles toolbox.

I will start off with my freq response from 15-200 hz at 74db reference level posted here;
http://cgim.audiogon.com/i/vs/i/f/1208699468.jpg

Waterfall response 20-116hz posted here;
http://cgim.audiogon.com/i/vs/i/f/1208644826.jpg

Waterfall response 116-210hz posted here;
http://cgim.audiogon.com/i/vs/i/f/1208645085.jpg

Anyone else?

Bob
acoustat6
goatwuss
877 posts
 
Hi Bob,

Thanks for your reply. I was using the Hifi news test LP.

Can you explain how exactly REW is a more accurate analyzer? I'm not challenging your assertion in the least, I just don't know.

I have used REW before, and I'm familiar with it. When I get a chance, I'll take another measurement with REW and post it on this thread. What type of smoothing should I use in REW? 1/3 smoothing still gives me quite a bit of comb filtering. Do you find 1/1 smoothing still gives accurate enough results?

Regarding comparing the phono preamps - Actually I did see quite a big difference. My supratek phono had some major response problems in the bass. I heard weak bass from it, and that is why I borrowed the Sim piece from my dealer, to run comparative RTA tests. Supratek has acknowledged that there is a problem with my preamp, and there are some parts now in transit to me that I will install in the phono circuit to hopefully fix the bass response problem.
acoustat6 OP
357 posts
 
Hi Goatwuss, I believe the REW would be higher resolution than what you are using , but I am not familiar with it just the one graph you posted. You need finer resolution than that.
I like to look at the graphs in several ways. No smoothing shows the most accurate response and therefore the real story of comb filtering, just how severe peaks or dip are within very narrow freq bands. 1/12 smoothing for general viewing and posting graps is preferred. 1 octave smoothing shows the energy levels loss or peaks over the octave levels.

Regarding the testing of preamps, I would not have assumed too much of a variation between preamps, unless one was broken, or so "colored" by design. And Iwold still have assumed that the in room response would overshadow that.

Bob
jpv
23 posts
 
Chad,
Did you ever get the 40Hz dip figured out?
John
More to discover