I also agree with Mrtennis. The speaker game is fickle and prone to subjectivity. That being said, I would want to ask specifically what sonic attributes are missing in cone/box designs over planar/electrostat designs? Both schools now claim to have harnessed attributes of the other, etc. I too have been bewitched by planar designs in terms of their diaphenous, holographic, and spooky presentation. Coincidentally, I am also turned off by aggressively voiced and hyperdynamic (read "slam") box speakers that cause many a phile to oooo and ahhh at shows but do not accurately recreate the original event. I have found a speaker that traverses that razor's edge between both designs: the Intuitive Design Delta Summits. It sounds as if SP Tech does something similar (at least according to a good friend of mine, Rx8man). With that being said, we had been planning a speaker symposium to highlight smaller, boutique companies that were producing cutting edge technology like SP Tech, Intuitive Design, Ridge Street Audio, Audiokinesis, and Emerald Physics. It would be neat to bring in designs based on Gedde's waveguide thing (SP Tech, Audiokinesis, Emerald Physics) and compare them to the latest and greatest planar stuff...in addition to Intuitive Design, etc. Chicago looks to be the eventual location for this speakerfest...