2. speakers
  3. 1003232799

I GIVE UP

Need practical advice from practical people, My Martin Logan SL3's are "tear your head off bright". I originally had a parasound line preamp, 2 parasound 125 wpc amps in a horizontal biamp configuration. I was told to try wiring the amps either mono or vertical biamp, try different interconnects, try different speaker cables, and try a different preamp. Well, I spent quite a bit of money and sonically, believe me when I say, there was absolutely no differnce at all. I'm certain, no ear could hear even the slightest differences. I'm not getting into the brands of cables I tried, i'm convinced solving real problems with cables is just BS. I went from the parasound pre to an EAD encore. I have been able to fix the problem, and make my system sound absolutely amazing. The problem is my wife cant deal with the blankets draped over the Martin Logans in our living room. Please help and give real advice. I'm considering giving up on ESL's, however there are many sonic advantages, that I really like about them. Please dont even bother with any ideas about positioning them, they have been everywhere except in the basement.

Thanks, Steve
sfrounds
yipean
42 posts
 
I'd sell the Martin Logans and buy a pair of Apogees. You can get a pair of used Stages from $750-$1200. The Stages don't have that "make your ears bleed" high end, and IMHO, are a far superior speaker. Check out the website below for other comments, particularly the topic titled "Martin Logan Sequel or Sequel IIs?".

http://audioworld.com/cgibin/sw/forumdisplay.cgi?action=topics&forum=Apogee+Acoustics+Users+Group&number=1
nalu
22 posts
 
First of all, make sure you've got enough (5+ feet) space behind the speakers, then experiment with toe-in. The curved panel rewards extensive experimentation with positioning. Also, damp your room properly and manage first reflections.
As above, Parasound do not make the best electronics for ML's. I have a pair of Sequel 2's and have done very well with a Sumo Nine +, NEW A20.1's (vertically biamped, but still underpowered for HT, fine for stereo) and now Atma-sphere M60 Mk2's. My Bryston 3B was OK, but probably not optimal. Fortunately, I had a big room at the time.
Changing power cords (or even better, using power conditioning) can also help. Changing preamps may be necessary, too, but try these other things first. Don't give up!
tomthompson
14 posts
 
Lots of good advice give so far; one and/or any could shape up your system. If you've really toyed with speaker positioning in your room, I'd be among those to ditch the amp. Tubes do sound nice with ML but might be more than you'd want to spend. For new amps, the McCormack 125 might be a solution. A great sleeper amp is a used Forte 4; can probably be had for <$500 and is still a great amp. While only rated at 50W, it delivers gobs of current and control. Unless your room is cavernous, this might be all the amp you'd ever need.
ed_sawyer
588 posts
 
Forget all that equipment BS. Toe them out. If you get to having them straight ahead and they are still too bright, move your listening position back. Still too bright? Then play with equipment. I have had 2 pairs of MLs and even in a barren room, they were not bright when set up correctly.

-Ed
jandj
19 posts
 
There certainly has been a lot of good advice. I have heard a lot of ML speakers SL3, Quest, CLS, and tubes do magic with them in the midrange. The bass suffers though. You may want to try the Music Reference RM200. This is designed to drive a low impedance which the SL3 has. Another is the RM9 MK II which has 125wpc. For solid state, the Rowlands, Audio Research D300 (this combination was at an audio show), and Classe 300 or 400. The mellow solid state amps will work wonders. Fine tune with cables later, Cardas or MIT, Monster, are good places to start. Good luck, Jeff
More to discover