Digging deeper shows other inconsistencies. Cartridges that have proven the test of time, have numerous reviews from highly credible individuals rate at the same level as others known to sound mediocre. In many cases derivations of the same cartridges are deemed to sound identical, yet most do sound different in reality.
No mention is made of specific partnering equipment, other than tonearm type(s) and gross cost. Tube or SS ? What kind of phono stages ? Was time taken to match compliance to effective mass ? Was time taken to match cables to cartridges for capacitance ? Was alignment performed by eye and steady hand, or were electrical and visual aids used ?
Ascribing so much value to appearance as it affects resale value, and to resale value as an absolute begs the question of whether the author knows the "price of everything and value of nothing"?
Impressive "looking" list, that is all but worthless to anyone who has more than a passing interest in determining how different cartridges sound relative to each other.