Thanks for your input(s). I have identified a suitable specialist through inquiries to a veneer supply house. In response to Commcat's surprise of not having heard of veneer problems with Dunlavy's speaker's, it is indeed quite common with Dunlavy's larger, floor-standing, speakers (SC-III, IV, V, and VI). There is even one thread at this site from several years ago that sought advice as to how to re-attach loose veneer to a larger Dunlavy speaker cabinet. In my experience, the problem is more common than not.
According to the person who I found, veneer detaches from its substrate due to the substrate changing size on one surface (he said the substrate becomes unbalanced). In the case of my Dunlavy SC-IVa's, the cabinet MDF board comprising the speaker outer walls apparently lost moisture and shrank on their outer surface and the veneer began to detach at the weakest glue bond points, thereby forming bubbles in the surface of the cabinet. The speaker could also acquire more moisture and increase in size. This would lead to the veener splitting on the MDF surface, leaving apparent gaps in the veneer.
This "unbalance" in the moisture content of the substrate (here again, we're talking about the Dunlavy MDF board cabinet walls) can be avoided by veneering both sides of the substrate. I suspect that Dunlavy did not do this double-sided veneering of the MDF materials before assembling the cabinets, because the speakers were available with different custom-ordered veneer skins. Perhaps Dunlavy did not worry about the moisture content of their MDF materials since they were assembling their speakers in a relatively low-humidity environment of Colorado. But I would expect that the veneer problem would be more evident with the larger speakers (surface expansion and contraction being highest along the longest dimension) and would be expected to vary to the extent that the speakers are used in an evironment whose relative humidity differs from that of Colorado.
According to the person who I found, veneer detaches from its substrate due to the substrate changing size on one surface (he said the substrate becomes unbalanced). In the case of my Dunlavy SC-IVa's, the cabinet MDF board comprising the speaker outer walls apparently lost moisture and shrank on their outer surface and the veneer began to detach at the weakest glue bond points, thereby forming bubbles in the surface of the cabinet. The speaker could also acquire more moisture and increase in size. This would lead to the veener splitting on the MDF surface, leaving apparent gaps in the veneer.
This "unbalance" in the moisture content of the substrate (here again, we're talking about the Dunlavy MDF board cabinet walls) can be avoided by veneering both sides of the substrate. I suspect that Dunlavy did not do this double-sided veneering of the MDF materials before assembling the cabinets, because the speakers were available with different custom-ordered veneer skins. Perhaps Dunlavy did not worry about the moisture content of their MDF materials since they were assembling their speakers in a relatively low-humidity environment of Colorado. But I would expect that the veneer problem would be more evident with the larger speakers (surface expansion and contraction being highest along the longest dimension) and would be expected to vary to the extent that the speakers are used in an evironment whose relative humidity differs from that of Colorado.