Differences between MAC C100, C200 and C46

I would like to thank everyone for their answers to my questions. This has helped a lot and given me much direction in making my decision.

thank you

Hassel, I don't run a TT yet but I plan to get one. One of the reasons I bought the c200 was because I wanted the ability to run MC/MM and the c200 has excellent phono sections. All I'll ever need.

Baldeagle, It's my understanding that any input can be assigned for pass through on the c200. Also the c200 is totally off when pass through is used. Volume is controlled from the A/V proc.

dear larrman the C100 and C200 work in the same way for the pass through mode in the C100 the A/V proc. controles all the volume the only difference is the C200 has a designation for the pass through and the C100 doesn't . the way they function are the same only the nameing is different. also you are right on the money the phone stages in theses are very good and in many cases better then some of the better stand alone units.

The two are basically identical. Please be aware of the fact that the first series of the C100 were flawed by a problem related to the volume control, which was subsequently upgraded. I believe the second series C100 has exactly the same volume control present in the C200.