Coincident with 8 ohm vs16 ohm

Kalan, I agree with your post regarding impedence:

"I would guess that some other factor is going on with the cj Premier 12's vs. the cj 11xs. In theory, all that's going on with lower impedance taps is more transformer windings in play."

I think my problem with using the P12's with the Super Eclipse 3's was due to the efficiency of the speakers. The P12's just didn't like to run with only a few watts of power output. My P12's drove my B&W N803N's with no problem and sounded great but I think they were within their desired operating power output while driving those speakers. With the very efficient Eclipse 3's, the P12's were idling and not sounding their best. I can push the cj 11xs and it's like a spotlight from heaven compared to the P12's.

Please don't take this the wrong way, but I never understand these threads. It's fine to ask for insight to share experience, but there is no way I'd use the input you get from people to determine which output tap to use.

In my mind, no matter who you are getting advice from, your mileage will vary. Their system (amplifier, loudspeaker cable, and loudspeaker) and tastes are going to differ from yours in some way. You simply MUST experiment on your own. For just about every speaker, its published impedance value is of little importance in relation to its impedance and phase angle curves, and even less importance in relation to how your particular amplifier is able to drive that load, using your speaker cables.

My solution is to try both, and evaluate each over a period of a day or two. Play a variety of music, and see which works better for YOU.

Good luck!!!

The Coincident Super Eclipses III will dip into the 6-Ohm region between 3k Hz up to about 5k Hz. Whether this dip in that frequency range is significant to most tube amplifiers, I do not know. The Supers may not be as efficient many of us think. My experience with the Supers and larger amps corroborate some apparent lack of efficiency somewhere. I believe that lower frequency impedance dips *may* be more influential on amplifier demand, but I am not certain about that.

Since I have amps that can be switched between 4- and 8-Ohm output impedance, they do seem to have better “control” on the lower setting. This probably means that the speaker dips below 8 Ohms. No positive effect would occur to take advantage of the lower output setting if the speaker did not dip into the below-8-Ohms region. Other tube amps (not just mine) with adjustable outputs yield the same results with the Super Eclipses as well.

When it comes to solid state, the larger the amp, the better the Supers seem to perform in terms of sheer control, dynamic envelope, and bass extension. The whole discussion about over all musical appeal with smaller, often times more refined amps vs. larger, brute force amps, is a whole other debate. I am addressing solely “drive-ability” here.

I would expect some possible sense of "mere idling" on a truly high impedance speaker paired up with solid state amplification, but not with tube amps. SS will (normally) only put out the required current to drive a given impedance load (not talking about SS with output autoformers, here), if the SS amp has the power reserves to deliver the current to begin with, that is. A truly high impedance speaker will possibly not "draw" enough current from a SS amp for the correct target tonal balance or dynamic punch to occur. But tube amps do not work this way. Standard tube power amps pretty much put out the same voltage no matter the impedance of the speaker load, or actually sometimes have *lower* output into lower impedance loads.

My experience with the Super Eclipses (owned the Mk I’s and currently own the Mk III’s) with both tube and SS amps definitely favors more power on the drive-ability score. I am puzzled as to why a higher-powered TUBE amp operating with 4-Ohm taps could not drive the Supers as well as a lower-powered tube amp with 8-Ohm taps. There must be other factors going on.

I believe I have the theories (or principles) correct, but I am open any new information that would shed light on what might be going on here.

Since a few of us have the same model of speakers as the originator of the thread, it does seem odd that we experience such different results. Bottom line…as I---and a couple of others---mention earlier, try different amps with different output settings (when ever possible) with your speakers and let your ears be the judge.

Kalan, I have tried Cayin 265ai ss integrated amp (class a 2x40 watts) strange
to say but this amp is the best match among many tube amps and ss amps I tried,with my TE
it may stop me to search best matching tube amp, seems very hard to find better performer amp among tube amps...

Ben, Room dimensions and music material also play a big role in amp power demands with a given speaker. "Power music" (full orchestra, organ, and bass-heavy pop) played in a larger room will take quite a bit more power than chamber music, intimate jazz, small scale pop, etc. in a smaller room.

If you have hit upon the Cayin 265ai as a good match with the TE's in your room and music, that's great. Not all watts are created equal, for sure. For me personally, I wouldn't even consider driving my Coincident Super E III's with 2x40 SS watts. (The Supers are supposedly less easy to drive than the TE’s.)

In my system with my music, the ~220 watts of the GamuT M200's represent the lower limit of the power requirement I would attempt with solid state. About ninety-five, push/pull, triode watts is the lower limit I would try with tubes. This is just an approach based on my experience: room, music, dynamic preferences, etc. Yours obviously differs.