Left out some possibly important details: Listening is mostly jazz and "old guy" rock (no head banging...), but not limited to such (variety *is* the spice of life). 12.5'x17.5'x8' room (this will eventually change as I rent). The amp and pre-amp will be purchased *very* soon. Unfortunately I am not able to audition the McCormack and would buy it used. Feedback from anyone who is familiar with Bryston and McCormack would be appreciated. TIA.
Bryston vs. McCormack
After deciding first on the Magnepan 1.6QR, then the Vandersteen 2ce Signature, I auditioned the Revelation 3 at length this weekend and bought a pair. They sounded that good to my ear. A Bryston 3B-ST was the amp of choice for the Maggies and Vandesteens, but the Hales are a different animal. Which would be a better match for the Hales: A Bryston 3B-ST or a McCormack DNA-0.5 or DNA-1? The only other part of the system already purchased is a CAL Alpha/Delta DAC-transport combination. For the pre-amp I've been leaning toward tubes, but mostly to tame the Bryston's (perceived) upper end brilliance or add a little focus for the Vandersteens. The overall characteristics of the Hales' is very close to the right sound: tight bass; not overly emphasized mid-range or treble, but not laid back, either; good timbre; smooth vocals. Which of these amps is going to lend the least amount of color to this sound? Also, any comments about putting a tube top-end into this system?
- ...
- 16 posts total
- 16 posts total