Bryston 14 B SST with Martin Logan SL3 speakers?

Well, I had a Bryston 4B-ST running ML Aerius i's, and - though powerful - the combo didn't work that well. Both the Bryston and ML's tend towards a lean, highly-resolving sound, and together they were uncomfortable to listen to for any length of time (bordering on just-plain-harsh with certain recordings).

I upgraded to a Pass Labs X-250 without changing the speakers or cabling (Analysis Plus Oval 9 spkr cables), which imparted a very smooth, warm character AND gained oodles of detail. Where the Bryston sounded dispassionate all the time and strained when pushed hard, the Pass drives these difficult loads (down to 1 ohm at 20Khz) with far more ease. And remember that I am comparing nearly identically-rated SS amps - 250Wx2 into 8 ohms, 500Wx2 into 4 ohms for both.

Of course, Your Mileage May Vary, because you have a different environment, SL3's instead of Aerius, a 14B instead of a 4B, etc. But the sonic family characters of both the Bryston amps and ML electrostats are probably quite relevant to your question.

If you are prepared to pony-up for the 14B-SST, I would recommend that you audition the Pass Labs and other amps with YOUR gear first. Then let your ears decide.

Hope that helps a bit.

Thanks for your suggestions, your comments are what I'm looking for to force me to have an open mind about this next important upgrade. I live in Nova Scotia, tring out a wide variety of new gear at home is nearly impossible so I have to rely on other means of evaluating equipment (quess work) which means that I will purchase it used and try it into my system. The Pass Labs gear has always looked to me as very fine gear, The X250 certainly is a beautiful looking piece of gear, one that wouldn't be a problem to stare at sitting between my speakers every day.
Keeping in mind of future upgrades in speakers, ones that may handle much more or less power than my SL3's, would you still suggest the Pass Labs X250 or should I look at the X350 for it's higher power capabilities? What is the sound like with these amps, at low listening levels?
I would appreciate your comments on this.
Thanks

I had Martin logan sequel2 which is the same sl3 but older model (I am not sure).I listened to these speakers with all kinds of amps and I just have to say problem is not the amps.The only amp that could challenge with this monster was my Bryston 7bsst wich is I still have it in my system.They need a lot of power to sing and your amp will run very hot.If you never had electrostatic speakers befor.I would say forget the Martin logan and go with dynamic speakers or if you are a big fun of these kinds of speakers I would prefer Quad over Martin logans.This speakers are not good with all kinds of musics and they do not rock.Some people saying that they good for jazz and classical but in my opinion,If your speakers are not fine with everything they are toys not speakers.Forget about looks,color,size,name and advertisments in stereophile because major of this products has been made to make some money.Go look for a pair speakers that makes you smile when you sit front it.
Good Luck
Hamlet

i used to run a classe ca 200 w/ sl-3's w/ awesome results. the 2 are a match made in heaven as martin-logan themselves will tell you.

In response to the other's comments and your question :

1st off, I too live in a fairly 'dry county' when it comes to hi-end audio, so I have a limited base of equipment to listen to without driving 100 miles to audition. Are there better combinations then what I have - OF COURSE!! But - like Bob, I have to weigh everyones' opinion equally and realize that just because someone says they love or hate a piece doesn't mean it will or won't work in my environment.

-- to those that say 'forget MartinLogan' - that wasn't the opinion that was asked for. I have ML's and mine are certainly 'a pair speakers that makes you smile when you sit front it' to quote broken english. MartinLogan speakers are NOT toys if they are used with the right hardware and set up correctly (which can admittedly be difficult in some rooms). IN MY SYSTEM, IN MY ROOM, IN MY OPINION they work great. 'Nuf said.

-- I agree that Classe' would be a good amp product to investigate for use with SL3's, and -to me- represent a step up from Bryston for sound quality. Good stuff; their upper-end amps have a reputation of being on par with comparable Levinson, Pass, Krell...

-- Back to your question, Bob - I tend to do all of my critical listening at moderately high volumes, and the Aerius are probably more limited in their ability to resolve details at low levels when compared to the larger ML's. But, when I AM using them at lower levels, there seems to be a nicely linear response from the Pass amp. Not knowing what you would be replacing the SL3's with, I can't comment on X-250 vs. X-350, other then to say that the 250 should be very capable of driving any ML very successfully up to the Prodigy series. The 350 would be even more so, but may not fit your budget (or your equipment rack - that's one huge amp!!).

-- Every product line seems to have it's own sonic character, so you should probably spend time listening to some of these amps to see what you like before deciding.

-- Also, ML's tend to be very sensitive to what speaker cables are used, so if you are going to spend big $$$ for a new amp, I would suggest you invest some research time and $$$ on the cables as well. I changed from MIT Terminator's to Analysis Plus Oval 9's when I moved from Rotel amps to Bryston, and am actually changing from the AP's to Shunyata Lyra cables this week. The sonic changes from the MIT's to AP's was DRAMATIC to say the least. I can only hope the Shunyatas make another big improvement.

BTW - I have a GREAT, super-reliable contact for purchasing pristine Pass stuff at awesome prices. Email me privately if you are interested.