B&W Signature 30 vs. Nautilus 803 speakers

The 30's do not use the Nautilus technology. The tweeter appears to be very similar to those on the 25's. Unlike the 25's it does not come with a separate crossover or dedicated speaker cable. The speaker is biwirable and the crossover is acoustically isolated and suspended within the cabinet.

Regarding bass, I've read the threads also and I am a little amused because the critiques rarely say "compared to what?" their bass is deficient.

My listening preferences are for Acoustic Jazz and Classical music. I don't feel that I am missing out; the 30's seem to load my 20x16 (plaster walled, maple floor with heavy rugs)room very well. I have heard these same speakers in a larger more square room and indeed in that room the low bass of bass drum in classical music was missing in action.

I think it is more a matter of room size and acoustics. I'm quite pleased with the depth and the articulate way that they handle acoustic bass.

Ray

Head to head the Sig 30's were more resolving, less smeared, more transparent, imaged and detailed than the 801n's. It was not even close. Was there less bass, yes, but most rooms can't reproduce real low bass anyway. In your room, you should not miss anything on the bottom.

not in the same league. Signature 30 together wirh SS25 are the most musical and resolving speakers B&W has ever made exluding the original Nautilus(Snails). I own both of them and would not trade them even for Signature 800.