B&W 803N vs REVEL F30. Which is a better choice??

I listened to both speakers and to my opinion the 803 is a little better, the 804 and the F30 is about in the same category.

I would agree with royy. I have heard both and have owned the 804 and the 803. I only appreciated the revel's when it was a studio or a salon. I have also think mark levinson and B&W nautilus series is a wonderful combination.

I have owned the 803n, and heard the revel f30, and in my opinion with solid state-the revels get the nod for the price difference. Both are very solid,but the f30 for the money is tough to beat- Want a little better?, check out a used pair of herons from Meadowlark..

I own N803's so naturally I am going to tell you that it is the right choice. I have had the opportunity to hear the F30's driven by Levinson gear and they sounded really good. I would go so far to say that in each respective price point each of these speakers are price/performance leaders, especially if your musical taste leans toward classical, jazz, folk, and non heavy metal rock. If the price difference is less than $1500 on the used market I would tell you go for broke and pick up a pair of N803's. If the price difference is around $1500 on the used market the F30's is a better bang for your buck.
Happy Hunting,
Drew

I've listened pretty carefully to 803N and 804N, as well F30 in my room. The 804N's anemic bass and therefore lightweight balance was unacceptable. The 803N sounded GREAT from ajoining rooms (indicating fine power response balance?), but would NOT cohere in my nearfield triangle (common problem with the larger Nautilus).
The Revel, however, sounded great in the nearfield, and clearly has the best midrange of the three. The 803N indeed produces PRODIGIOUS bass, but doesn't make music in a small-medium room. All results will vary, but I actually would take the F30 at PAR with the 803N ($$ wise)! Dood luck,
Ern