Anyone else attend the California Audio Show in Oakland?


I went yesterday 7/28, heard some really good stuff, including:

Old Forge Studios room. The Soundkaos Vox 3F standmounted 3 ways were incredible! My favorites of the show. Tiny boxes and 35Hz on the low end had many of us looking for a subwoofer. The Wand tt and PureAudio electronics were excellent.

Tidal Contriva speakers speakers were my 2nd choice as favorites. Just a bit more expensive than the Soundkaos at $65,000, they were beautiful to look at and gorgeous to listen to, or vice versa. Open and airy, great bass extension, with the equally fine Bricasti amps and preamp, they would surely be even better in a larger room.

Aurender streamers and dacs also pulled me in. I’m looking for new gear, and they have a great selection. The combo dacs and streamers start at around $3500 and run to $22,000 for the W22SE, which was playing in their room. 

On on the down side:

Audio Vision SF Room
I didn’t care for the Naim/Rega/Focal gear. It sounded very shut in, muffled to me. Sibilance was not pronounced, and the Focal speakers sounded blurred. 

Wyred4sound

I've never been a fan, so maybe I’m biased, but the new gear just didn’t add up to me. Disjointed is the word I come up with. The new W4S speakers were these hulking boxes, with drivers arranged in MTM configuration. The tweeters are ribbons, which I usually enjoy, but these sounded too laid back to me. 

Any other attendee thoughts?

pumper24
Agree.  Old Forge / Sound Kaos / Pure Audio was the absolute best in the show.  I think this may have even beat 99% of the rooms are RMAF last year (at least in my opinion and preferred sound).

I had the opposite reaction to the Tidal / Bricasti room.  It seem really harsh and thin to me.  Not sure what happened.  Maybe a bad pairing between electronics and speaker.  The Bricasti M28 sounded a lot better in the Sound Lab room, but the electrostatic panels are probably more forgiving speakers than the Tidal.

The Focal room was not bad.  However, I did not get all the resolution and texture that should have been coming out of those speakers.  Sound was very smooth without any brightness/harshness (which is hard to do with Focal), but it lacked the grit / bite / resonance from the voices and instruments.  The whole setup was done with Nordost cabling which could be the culprit for hiding that high frequency texture/tonality.  Silver tends to smooth out the grittiness in the sound.

I never really focused on Wired 4 Sound before, but I agree with your responses.  I don't think it's the new Wyred speaker that's the problem.  Ribbons are generally very high resolution and bright.  I think it's just the sound of that Class D ICE in the Wyre 4 Sound.  It sounded low resolution and boomy to me.  I got the same warmer / rolled-off highs in the Unisinger room across the way, which also used Wyred 4 Sound amps.
Oh, If Old Forge / Sound Kaos was first place, the second place would go to the Margules Audio room (the Lyn Stanley room). 
You’re too kind! I must say the room was jammed full constantly and I needed to reprint the handout sheet as they were disappearing faster than cold spring water at a desert music fest!

Speaking of RMAF, I will have two systems at RMAF, one identical to the one you just heard in Oakland and a second featuring the Sound Kaos Wave 42 driven by tube electronics TBD.
I'm probably somewhat biased, since vinyl is my preferred source. That said, once again Zesto did a fantastic job with their room. I believe there was only one other room featuring vinyl; everything else was digital ... mostly streamers.

I really liked the rooms featuring Exogal - to my ears, one of the most natural sounding DAC's out there. The Exogal fed by Salk StreamPlayer, with Salk SS 9.5 speakers was very impressive. I had to catch myself to keep from clapping at the end of Coltrane's "Blue Train" demo!