Any other MJ Acoustics owners out there?

I don't own one but I've been very on the fence about getting an MJ sub instead of a REL. The remote seems to be a useful feature but I worreid but resell value and factory support in the US. Can you offer any thoughts on why you're digging it ?

I'm digging it because its fast and musical. It adds just the right amount of bass without drawing attention to itself. The sub is very useful to once you learn how too use it.

After careful research and much waiting to see what would become available used, i settled on a pair of new ref 200's. They're on their way and when they get here i'll come back to this thread and give you my opinion. i chose them beacause of all the favorable reviews and comparisons to REL, which are supposed to blend well with Soundlab stats.

Brimac and Tri, I've had my Ref200s for a few months now and they are great match with the WBenesch Arcs. They do disappear with the music. One thing I did notice is that with a stereo pair, I do get a Phatom center for bass, especially with the last cables upgrade. Amazing.

Brimac, when you get your 200s, they will sound good but you will have to upgrade all of the cables$ Give me an email or post for any suggestions.

Well, the ref 200's are in the system now and I'm more than just a little impressed. The soundstage has expanded in every direction and instruments are better defined, almost as if they have more space to themselves. Contrary to previous experiences with lesser subs, the Ref 200's have brought more definition and air to the mids and highs, rather than the muddiness people have come to expect from subs.

Elducsesol, you've had success with alternate cabling? Are you using the Speakon connector? i found the differences between the speakon and the rca to be night and day.

i had some people over last night and all they could say was 'oh my, listen to that'. Nice endorsement!