2. home-theater
  3. 153290-19386

Adding 5-channel amps to AV Receivers

I'm currently shopping for a used 5-channel amp to use with my Denon x3400h receiver with a 5.1.2 Atmos setup, speakers are the older SVS SCS1/SB1 which still do great.  This setup is 100% movies/video games, music is for the 2-channel setup upstairs (Levinson, Revel, PS Audio).  The home theater is never going to get the budget that the music system gets, but its still a lot of fun and Dolby Atmos is really cool with down-firing ceiling mounted speakers.

My question - It seems like adding a separate 5-channel amp to pretty much any AVR would be a very standard setup for anything above a low-end home theater setup, but I rarely see it discussed.  IMO its asking a lot of a sub-$1k receiver to handle all the processing and 7 channels of amplification with its single power supply.  When you can buy a used Rotel, Parasound, etc 5-channel amp for less than $500 and let the AVR be the processor, this should be a no-brainer right?  Pulling out at least 5 channels to a real amp should have all kinds of obvious benefits.  Even if the speakers are not full-size, reasonably efficient, and there's no clear need for more power, this should still produce much better sound.

It seems like an obvious move but its hard to find any discussion of it, usually the conversation goes from budget AVR to high-end AVR to separates.  Am I missing something here?
jimmywho
jimmywho OP
20 posts
 
Keep in mind that according to Gene DellaSalla that even if the internal amps of AVR are not being used, and still turned on, they introduce distortion into the preamp section as volume is increased, so the internal amps must be shut off like in the high-end Denons. So adding an external multi-channel amp to an AVR is more of transition to having a separate pre/pro and power amp, so factor this long term transition into your budget.

Since I’m not a serious videophile owning a somewhat newer high end AVR is a better choice for me. My 10 yr old Yamaha RXV2700 140 wpc 7.1 avr is a good compromise for me. Stepping up to something a bit newer with high power may be a good alternative to separates.
For sure, without question its really disappointing that the pre-outs on pretty much all receivers apparently are not well implemented.  That's a convincing explanation and it does reinforce that adding the external amp is not the final answer, even if its a good upgrade in the meantime. 

It also provides a good explanation for my original question of why this isn't more common, I'm very appreciative for the info here.


ddafoe
243 posts
 
I purchased an Emotiva UMC-200 pre/processor when it came out and paired it with an Anthem 5 channel amp.  That combo definitely out performed an older but higher end Denon receiver that I was using as a 5 channel processor (i.e. it supported preamp out).

I just got my first source (4K Amazon Fire Stick) that wouldn't work with the 6+ year old processor.  I didn't feel like spending a lot on a new processor so I just purchased a refurbished Yamaha TSR-7810 receiver that has a preamp out.   I cabled it up to the Anthem and after running its auto speaker setup listened to a movie soundtrack and I think it sounds at least as good if not better than the much older processor.   I'm definitely happy with its audio quality (as I was with the Emotiva); the Yamaha can be had for $300ish refurbished.

jimmywho OP
20 posts
 
Finally have an update on the results.  Had a couple issues with both amps I bought, but long story short I'm using now using a Krell Showcase 5 amp into the Denon 3400.  I'm only using 3 channels on the Krell for the front 3, and the Denon is handling the rest.  One of the channels on the Krell outputs some static (needs a re-cap maybe?), but I got a great deal on it so I'm fine with this.

Overall, its a big upgrade.  Way bigger soundstage, more transparency and clarity, just significantly better sound.  This is my HT setup and its mostly movies with the occasional concert Blu Ray, so I used Metallica's "Quebec Magnetic" and Mad Max: Fury Road as the test subjects.  

Obviously, the Krell/Denon pairing is probably not a very popular combo. But for about a thousand bucks between the two, its hard to imagine doing better for the money for 7-channel 5.1.2 Atmos.  I'd highly recommend going this route, especially if you have speakers that could be considered at all power hungry.

Want to thank everyone here for their insight on the nuances and mechanics on some of the details I hadn't considered (especially the sub-par implementation of the pre-outs on most receivers).







cio52
121 posts
 
I am glad the OP has a solution to the question but I wanted to add something he and everyone could still use and that is a power conditioner with reserve power. I have a Furman Elite-20 PF I that I bought open box from Audio Advisor. It has in excess of 4.5 amps of continuous current reserve (over 55 amps peak charge). My system is 7.2.2 with a Denon x6300 AVR(11.2 channels) $1500 from Crutchfield, bi-amped B&W 803 Nautilus tower L&R, B&W HTM2, B&W LM1 surround, B&W DB4 subs and Polk in ceiling speakers and I have never heard or felt like there was any fatigue coming from the speakers. In fact I would characterize the sound quality as "riveting" when listening to a movie like Blade Runner 2049. I used Audioquest Rocket 44 speaker cables, Pangea sub interconnects and Pangea Power Cords on every component. A problem with using a separate multi-channel amp is all the extra interconnects and the extra expense and related sound degradation (EMI, RFI, or poor quality cables) they bring. Hope this helps future readers of this thread.
More to discover