15" vs 18" subwoofer - which to buy?


If price and room space/aesthetics were not a big issue, is there any reason to get a 15" subwoofer over an 18" one? My main issue is not disturbing the neighbors too much. I'm confused about the difference between a 15" and 18" subwoofer. I want to get the best sound quality possible for low-to-medium volume use.

I've heard that an 18" subwoofer can be played at low decibels and provide good bass resolution and fullness of sound, while to achieve the same volume with a 15" subwoofer, the power has to be much higher. So for any given sound volume, the main difference is in distortion- and higher distortion sound may be more obtrusive. Is this true? it seems counterintuitive that an 18" subwoofer could be better for neighbors than a 15" subwoofer.

However, I compared a B&W800 (12") vs B&W850 (15"). I listened from the other side of the store wall (not as thick as my apt), and at minimum levels which I found satisfying for HT, I found the 12" more obvious and 'boomy' sounding while the 18" produced a more subtle (though actually more powerful), lower frequency vibration, like a very low-level rumbling background earthquake. The 15" subwoofer did seem more of a disturbance because of it's 'obvious' sound. However, I worry that an 18" won't even start producing quality sound until a certain volume that was much higher than a 15", and consequently potentially more disruptive for neighbors. Is this true? What is the relationship between subwoofer size, low sound volume, and subjective listening experience?

Unfortunately, it will be difficult to get an opportunity to hear both the DD-15 and DD-18 which I am considering, so I hope someone can help out here.
no_slouch
Bagend is the only way to go, the bagend infra sub 18 is not a sub you look at and say that's a great looking sub. The velodyne is a looker, but in sound!! does not compare to bagend. When you put one or two in your system you will "here" why it is so special. Dave
Dgw7000

Did you hear the DD-15 or 18? What do mean when you say "does not compare"?

Tim
Yes, I have heard both the dd 15 and 18 at my local hifi house, I feel the Velodyne is great for HT. I like the dd-18 much better than the dd-15, but for 2 channel the bagend with it's time alignment just becomes part of the music. The infra sub 18 blends so well with anying speaker, your speakers just open up and the bass is just there, so tight so controlled. When you turn off the bagend you say to yourself holly shit!!! This is what really good bass is all about, the music becomes very real. I would say the bagend is the most musical sub I have ever heard. The Vel. to me is one notey!!! Not Musical, but I love the way the Vel. looks!!! The sound is what really matters though!!
I also like 2 REL strada's, which at one point I had in my system. In the end the 18 inch bagend is the only way to go, if you can get it past your wife as your lugging in the room!!!
Dgw7000

I would have to say the local hifi house did not have the Velodyne subs setup correctly. They should call tech. support and get them running the right way.

Tim
Greetings Dgw;

Your sure to stir up some heated debate in your assessment of the Bag Ends comparative performance, yet Ill consider your remarks valid based on your previous equipment, all high quality stuff, money not being the issue.

I must also confess not to care to be misleading in my comments about products to other posters looking in however, that being said, I concur that the Infra 18 is a sealed {not tuned} enclosure that is both time and phase coherent that delivers bass information that's very controlled, detailed with excellent timing and pitch, just does its job and gets out of the way of the important mid range while disappearing into the stage when no low bass information is there, totally integrated into my system yet never, ever, letting you know its position --geographically speaking.

This really is a reference product that should be on anyone's short list for those seeking a low bass frequency specialist sub that has seamless integration, effortless speed, extremely low frequency output, ie. thinking about how realistic the huge pipe organ music with sustained continuous low frequency shuddering/energy is utterly and effortlessly reproduced not to mention stand up acoustic bass like that from the Ray Brown trio or Michael Arnopold from Patricia Barbers catalogue etc.. that's done seemingly with nadda missing, not a note!

Just wanted to add in that last little comment about the sense of spaciousness this sub imparts to better recordings, its almost the same sort of dimensionality tube seekers enjoy in their playback, my thoughts as to whats causing this is perhaps this sub picks up reverberation trails or echoes in studios and venues that most other subs seem to miss, thus contributing one more subtle spatial cue that will greatly enhance the visual glimpse into recorded performances-- most surprising in addition to the terrific bass . " other writers have also commented on this effect in professional reviews"

In my unbiased opinion - YES - one of the very best.

Regards /// Tim W...